A cross-sectional postal survey of musculoskeletal physiotherapists’ opinions towards the published theory of cervical spine manipulation

References

• Croft PR, Lewis M, Papageorgiou AC, Thomas E, Jayson MI, Macfarlane GJ, Risk factors for neck pain: a longitudinal study in the general population. Pain 2001;93(3):317–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross A, Miller J, D'Sylva J, Burnie SJ, Goldsmith CH, Graham N, Manipulation or mobilisation for neck pain: a Cochrane review. Man Ther [Internet]. 2010;15(4):315–33. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1356689X10000731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans R, Leininger B, Triano J. Effectiveness of manual therapies: the UK evidence report. Chiropr Osteopath 2010;18:3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlesso LC, Gross AR, Santaguida PL, Burnie S, Voth S, Sadi J. Adverse events associated with the use of cervical manipulation and mobilization for the treatment of neck pain in adults: a systematic review. Man Ther [Internet]. 2010;15(5):434–44. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1356689X10000330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon HT, Dhami MS, Howley TP, Annett R. Spinal manipulation and beta-endorphin: a controlled study of the effect of a spinal manipulation on plasma beta-endorphin levels in normal males. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1986;9(2):115–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoz R. The significance of the manipulative crack and of other articular noises. Ann Swiss Chiropr Assoc 1969;4:47–68.
   Google Scholar
• Leaver AM, Maher CG, Herbert RD, Latimer J, McAuley JH, Jull G, A randomized controlled trial comparing manipulation with mobilization for recent onset neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil [Internet]. 2010;91(9):1313–18. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999310003151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins E, Kerr J, Goodlad E. A practical approach to orthopaedic medicine: assessment, diagnosis, treatment, 3rd ed. Edinburgh; New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2010. 480 p.
   Google Scholar
• Rivett D, Magarey M, Refshauge K, Shirley D. Clinical guidelines for assessing vertebrobasilar insufficiency in the management of cervical spine disorders. Aust Physiother Assoc [Internet]. 2006 [cited 23 December 2014]; Available from: http://almacen-gpc.dynalias.org/publico/Valoracion%20Insuficiencia%20vertebrobasilar%20APA%202006.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fabio RPD. Manipulation of the cervical spine: risks and benefits. Phys Ther [Internet]. 1999;79(1):50–65. Available from: http://ptjournal.apta.org/content/79/1/50.
   Google Scholar
• Miller J, Gross A, D'Sylva J, Burnie SJ, Goldsmith CH, Graham N, Manual therapy and exercise for neck pain: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2010;15(4):334–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton A, Rivett D, Carlesso L, Flynn T, Hing W, Kerry R. International framework for examination of the cervical region for potential of cervical arterial dysfunction prior to orthopaedic manual therapy intervention. Man Ther 2014;19(3):222–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlesso L, Rivett D. Manipulative practice in the cervical spine: a survey of IFOMPT member countries. J Man Manipulative Ther [Internet]. 2011;19(2):66–70. Available from: http://www.maneyonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/2042618611Y.0000000002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• New Consent Guidance from CSP | The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy [Internet]. [cited 23 December 2014]. Available from: http://acppld.csp.org.uk/documents/new-consent-guidance-csp.
   Google Scholar
• Reference guide to consent for examination or treatment (second edition) – Publications – GOV.UK [Internet]. [cited 23 December 2014]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/reference-guide-to-consent-for-examination-or-treatment-second-edition.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer G, Budgell B, Henderson C, Khalsa P, Pickar J. Basic science research related to chiropractic spinal adjusting: the state of the art and recommendations revisited. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2006;29(9):726–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Alonso-Blanco C, Cleland JA, Rodríguez-Blanco C, Alburquerque-Sendín F. Changes in pressure pain thresholds over C5-C6 zygapophyseal joint after a cervicothoracic junction manipulation in healthy subjects. J Manipulative Physiol Ther [Internet]. 2008;31(5):332–7. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475408001103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Camargo VM, Alburquerque-Sendín F, Bérzin F, Stefanelli VC, de Souza DPR, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C. Immediate effects on electromyographic activity and pressure pain thresholds after a cervical manipulation in mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2011;34(4):211–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sillevis R, Cleland J. Immediate effects of the audible pop from a thoracic spine thrust manipulation on the autonomic nervous system and pain: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2011;34(1):37–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haavik H, Murphy B. Subclinical neck pain and the effects of cervical manipulation on elbow joint position sense. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2011;34(2):88–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans DW. Why do spinal manipulation techniques take the form they do? Towards a general model of spinal manipulation. Man Ther [Internet]. 2010;15(3):212–9. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1356689X09000526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punch K. Developing effective research proposals. London: SAGE; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning J, Rushton A. The effects of cervical high-velocity low-amplitude thrust manipulation on resting electromyographic activity of the biceps brachii muscle. Man Ther 2009;14(5):508–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmgren PJ, Sandström PJ, Lundqvist FJ, Heikkilä H. Improvement after chiropractic care in cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility and subjective pain intensity in patients with nontraumatic chronic neck pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2006;29(2):100–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinazzi M, Zanette G, Polo A, Volpato D, Manganotti P, Bonato C, Transient deafferentation in humans induces rapid modulation of primary sensory cortex not associated with subcortical changes: a somatosensory evoked potential study. Neurosci Lett 1997;223(1):21–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolasi L, Priori A, Tinazzi M, Bertasi V, Rothwell JC. Inhibitory action of forearm flexor muscle afferents on corticospinal outputs to antagonist muscles in humans. J Physiol 1998;511(Pt 3):947–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasil-Neto JP, Valls-Solé J, Pascual-Leone A, Cammarota A, Amassian VE, Cracco R, Rapid modulation of human cortical motor outputs following ischaemic nerve block. Brain J Neurol 1993;116(Pt 3):511–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickar JG. An in vivo preparation for investigating neural responses to controlled loading of a lumbar vertebra in the anesthetized cat. J Neurosci Methods 1999;89(2):87–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldeman S. Pain physiology as a neurological model for manipulation. In: PPEG DO, (ed.). Concepts and mechanisms of neuromuscular functions [Internet]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1984 [cited 23 December 2014]. p. 9–18. Available from: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-69779-1_2.
   Google Scholar
• Wall PD. The dorsal horn: In Wall PD, Melzack R, Textbook of pain. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Kolberg C, Horst A, Kolberg A, Belló-Klein A, Partata WA. Effects of high-velocity, low-amplitude manipulation on catalase activity in men with neck pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2010;33(4):300–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan PC, Triano JJ, McGregor M, Kokjohn K, Hondras MA, Brennan DC. Enhanced neutrophil respiratory burst as a biological marker for manipulation forces: duration of the effect and association with substance P and tumor necrosis factor. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1992;15(2):83–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambajon VV, Cillo JE, Gassner RJ, Buckley MJ. The effects of mechanical strain on synovial fibroblasts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61(6):707–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant R. Physical therapy of the cervical and thoracic spine. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2002. 460 p.
   Google Scholar
• Souvlis T, Vicenzino B, A W. Neurophysiological effect of spinal manual therapy [Internet]. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2004 [cited 23 December 2014]. Available from: http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:70337.
   Google Scholar
• Skyba DA, Radhakrishnan R, Rohlwing JJ, Wright A, Sluka KA. Joint manipulation reduces hyperalgesia by activation of monoamine receptors but not opioid or GABA receptors in the spinal cord. Pain 2003;106(1–2):159–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicenzino B, Collins D, Benson H, Wright A. An investigation of the interrelationship between manipulative therapy-induced hypoalgesia and sympathoexcitation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1998;21(7):448–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy I, Caldwell K. A cross-sectional postal survey of musculoskeletal physiotherapists’ current practice of cervical pain assessment in relation to vertebrobasilar artery insufficiency, attitudes toward guidelines, and manual therapy practice. Int Musculoskelet Med [Internet]. 2014;36(4):137–49. Available from: http://www.maneyonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/1753615414Y.0000000037.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, 2nd edition. Hillsdale. N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Kinnear PR, Gray CD. IBM SPSS statistics 18 made simple. Aberdeen: Psychology Press; 2010. p. 655.
   Google Scholar