The influence of message framing and message familiarity on direct-to-consumer (DTC) antidepressant advertising

References

• An S. Antidepressant direct-to-consumer advertising and social perception of the prevalence of depression: application of the availability heuristic. Health Commun 2008;23(6):499–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett AS. Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs. J Watch Gen Med 2007;357:673–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donohue JM, Cevasco M, Rosenthal MB. A decade of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs. J Med 2007;357(7):673–81.
   Google Scholar
• General Accounting Office. Prescription drugs: FDA oversight of direct-to-consumer advertising has limitations. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Findlay SD. Direct-to-consumer promotion of prescription drugs: economic implications for patients, payers and providers. Pharmacoeconomics 2001;19(2):109–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donohue JM, Berndt ER, Rosenthal MB, Epstein AM, Frank RG. Effects of pharmaceutical promotion on adherence to the treatment guidelines for depression. Med Care 2004;42(12):1176–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Patient and physician attitudes and behaviors associated with DTC promotion of prescription drugs – summary of FDA survey research results; 2004. Available at www.fda.gov/cder/ddmac/research.htm [accessed 2009 Mar 21].
   Google Scholar
• Eichner R, Maronick TJ. A review of direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising and sales of prescription drugs: does DTC advertising increase sales and market share? J Pharmaceut Mark Manag 2001;13(4):19–42.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Kelton CML, Jing Y, Guo JJ, Li X, Patel NC. Utilization, price, and spending trends for antidepressants in the US medicaid program. Res Soc Admin Pharm 2008;4(3):244–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandy RK, Tellis GJ, MacInnis DJ, Thaivanich P. What to say when: advertising appeals in evolving markets. J Mark Res 2001;38(4):399–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pechmann C, Stewart DW. The effects of comparative advertising on attention, memory and purchase intentions. J Consum Res 1990;17(2):180–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlen M. Banner advertisements through a new lens. J Advertising Res 2001;41(4):23–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janiszewski C. Preattentive mere exposure effects. J Consum Res 1993;20(3):376–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell MC, Keller KL. Brand familiarity and advertising repetition effects. J Consum Res 2003;30:292–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker WH, Hutchinson JW, Moore D, Nedungadi P. Brand familiarity and advertising: effects on the evoked set and brand preference. Adv Consum Res 1986;13(1):637–42.
   Google Scholar
• Alba JW, Hutchinson JW. Dimensions of consumer expertise. J Consum Res 1987;13(4):411–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A. An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979;47(2):263–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühberger A. The influence of framing on risky decisions: a meta-analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1998;75(1):23–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin IP, Schneider SL, Gaeth GJ. All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1998;76(2):149–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robberson MR, Rogers RW. Beyond fear appeals: negative and positive persuasive appeals to health and self-esteem. J Appl Soc Psychol 1988;18:277–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerowitz BE, Chaiken S. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. J Person Soc Psychol 1987;52(3):500–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Buda R. Moderating effects of need for cognition on responses to positively versus negatively framed advertising messages. J Advertising 1999;28(2):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith GE. Framing in advertising and the moderating impact of consumer education. J Advertising Res 1996;36(5):49–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganzach Y, Karsahia N. Message framing and buying behavior: a field experiment. J Bus Res 1995;32(1):11–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung W-S, Villegas J. The influence of message framing, involvement, and nicotine dependence on effectiveness of anti-smoking public service announcements. Paper presented at the 2009 American Academy of Advertising Annual Conference, Cincinnati, OH; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Maheswaran D, Meyers-Levy J. The influence of message framing and issue involvement. J Mark Res 1990;27(3):361–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Celsi RL, Olson JC. The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. J Consum Res, 1988;15(2):210–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo JT, Petty RE. Issue involvement as a moderator of the effects on attitude of advertising content and context. Adv Consum Res 1981;8(1):20–4.
   Google Scholar
• MacInnis DJ, Moorman C, Jaworski BJ. Enhancing and measuring consumers' motivation, opportunity, and ability to process brand information from Ads. J Mark 1991;55(4):32–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergera PD, Smith GE. The impact of prospect theory based framing tactics on advertising effectiveness. Omega 1998;26(5):593–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie SB, Lutz RJ, Belch GE. The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: a test of competing explanations. J Mark Res 1986;23(2):130–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell AA, Olson JC. Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude. J Mark Res 1981;18(3):318–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimp TA. Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of consumer brand choice. J Advertising 1981;10(2):9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Spurgeon D. Doctors feel pressurized by direct to consumer advertising. Br Med J 1999;319(7221):1321.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TNS Media Intelligence 2008 Advertising Investment Trend Report: Direct-to-Consumer Pharmaceutical Industry. Available at www.tns-mi.com/downloads/DTCPharmaReport.pdf [accessed 2009 Mar 30].
   Google Scholar
• Krugman HE. Brain wave measures of media involvement. J Advertising Res 1971;11(1):3–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein S, Appel V, Weinstein CS. Brain-activity responses to magazine and television advertising. J Advertising Res 1980;20(3):57–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson RA. On the use of college students in social science research: insights from a second-order meta-analysis. J Consum Res 2001;28(3):450–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The American College Health Association. American College Health Association – National College Health Assessment Spring 2007 Reference Group Data Report. J Am Coll Health 2008;56(5):469–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisch J, Leino EV, Silverman MM. Aspects of suicidal behavior, depression, and treatment in college students: results from the spring 2000 national college health assessment survey. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2005;35(1):3–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher RP, Zhang B, Taylor R. National survey of counseling center directors, 2003. Alexandria, VA: International Association of Counseling Centers; 2003.
   Google Scholar