Framing public health issues: the case of smoking ban in Greece, Public Health Policy Framing equals Healthy Framing of Public Policy?

References

• United Nations specialized agency on international public health World Health Organization’ (WHO). Available from http://www.who.int.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman R, Thorson E, Wilkins L. Testing the effect of framing and sourcing in health news stories. J Health Commun 2011;16:941–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park H, Reber BH. Using public relations to promote health: a framing analysis of public relations strategies among public health associations. J Health Commun 2010;15:39–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis MR, Gilpin AE, Loken B, Viswanath Κ, Wakefield AM. The role of the media in promoting and reducing tobacco use. Volume: Control Monograph, NIH Public Series, Issue 19, Publisher: Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Siu W. Social construction of reality. The tobacco issue. Crit Public Health 2009;19(1):23–44.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg Smith K, Wakefield M. Australia newspaper coverage of youth and tobacco: implications for public health. Health Commun 2006;19(1):19–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magzamen S, Annemarie C, Stanton GA. Print media coverage of California's smoke-free bar law. Tob Control 2001;10:154–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menashe LC, Siegel M. The power of a frame: an analysis of newspaper coverage of tobacco issues – United States, 1985–1996. J Health Commun 1998;3:307–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunato A, Sigafoos J, Morsillo-Searls LM. A communication plan for Autism and its applied behavior analysis treatment: a framing strategy. Child Youth Care Forum 2007;36:87–97.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services/Public Health Service/National Institutes of Health. Media Strategies for Smoking Control. 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Abroms LC, Maibach EW. The effectiveness of mass communication to change public behavior. Ann Rev Public Health 2008;29:219–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkin KCh, Rice RE. Theory and principles of public communication campaigns. 4th ed.: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rice RE. Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: multivariate results from the Pew surveys. Int J Med Inform 2006;75(1):8–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maibach WE, Parrott RL. Designing health messages; approaches from communication theory and public health practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman S, Wakefield M. Tobacco control advocacy in Australia: reflections on 30 years of progress. Health Educ Behav 2001;28(3):274–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova D, Lee Kaid L, Williams PA, Trammell DK. War on the web: the immediate news framing of Gulf War II. Harvard Int J Press/Politics 2005;10(1):22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman MR. Framing U.S. coverage of international news. J Commun 1991;41(4):6–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman MR. Framing: toward clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. J Commun 1993;43:51–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin T. The whole world is watching: mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Tuchman G. Making news: a study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Κɛντɛρɛλίδου Κλɛιώ. Τηλɛοπτικά Κɛντρικά Δɛλτία Ειδήσɛων και Κυβέρνηση: Η Έρρηξη Ενημέρωσης και Προπαγάνδας στις Ειδήσɛις. Θɛσσαλονίκη, Ελλάδα: Αριστοτέλɛιο Πανɛπιστήμιο Θɛσσαλονίκης; 2009. [Clio Kenterelidou. Broadcast television network evening news (TV news) and government: the implosion of information and propaganda in the news. Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; 2009.].
   Google Scholar
• Goffman E. Frame analysis. New York: Harper and Row; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrova D, Strömbäck J. Mission accomplished? Framing of the Iraq War in the Elite Newspapers in Sweden and the United States. Gazette: Int J Commun Studies 2005;67(5):399–417.
   Google Scholar
• Durrant R, Wakefield M, McLeod K, Clegg-Smith K, Chapman S. Tobacco in the news: an analysis of newspaper coverage of tobacco issues in Australia, 2001. Tob Control 2003;12(2):1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar S. Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele AD. Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Commun Soc 2000;3(2/3):297–316.
   Google Scholar
• Entman MR. Projections of power; framing news, public opinion and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers ME, Peterson JC. Diffusion of Clean Indoor Air Ordinances in the Southwestern United States. Health Edu Behav 2008;35(5):683–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979;XVLII:263–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto F, John OP. Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information. J Pers Soc Psychol 1991;61:380–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skowronski JJ, Carlston DE. Social judgment and social memory: the role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity Biases. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987;52:689–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SM, Petty RE. Message framing and persuasion: a message processing analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1996;22:258–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerowitz BE, Chaiken S. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. J Pers Soc Psycho 1987;52:500–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson MT, Witte K. Creating fear in a risky world: generating effective health risk messages. In: , Rice RE, Atkin CK, (eds.) Public communication campaigns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000. p. 88–104.
   Google Scholar
• Leshner G, Huei-Cheng I. The effects of frame, appeal, and outcome extremity of antismoking messages on cognitive processing. Health Commun 2009;24:219–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong OC, McMurray NE. Framing communication: communicating the antismoking message effectively to all smokers. J Community Psychol 2002;30(4):433–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Corp B. The constructionist approach to framing: bringing culture back in. J Commun 2007;57:60–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese DS, Gandy HO, Grant EA. Framing public life: perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver HD. Thoughts on agenda setting, framing and priming. J Commun 2007;57:142–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurston EW, Rutherford E, Meadows LM, Vollman AR. The role of the media in public participation: framing and leading? Women Health 2005;41(4):101–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelkin D. Selling science: how the press covers science and technology. 2nd ed. New York: W H Freeman; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Knight MG. Getting past the impasse: framing as a tool for public relations. Public Relations Rev 1999;17:27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman S. Advocacy in public health: roles and challenges. Int J Epidemiol 2001;30:1226–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studlar TD. U.S. tobacco control: public health, political economy, or morality policy? Rev Policy Res 2008;25(5):393–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman B, Chapman S, Storey P. Banning smoking in cars carrying children: an analytical history of a public health advocacy campaign. Aust N Z J Public Health 2008;32(1):60–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkin CK. Theory and principles of media health campaigns. In: , Rice RE, Atkin CK, (eds.) Public communication campaigns. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001. p. 49–68.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler EP, Glastra FF, Kats E. Public information and field theory. Political Commun 1998;15:445–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin CR. Framed! Labor and the corporate media. Ithaca, NY: ILR; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Graber AD. Media power in politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Roth LA, Dunsby J, Bero LA. Framing processes in public commentary on US Federal Tobacco Control Regulation. Soc Stud Sci 2003;33(1):7–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union/Public Health/Tobacco Policy. Directive 2001/37 Tobacco Products & Directive 2003/33 Tobacco Advertising). Available from http://ec.europa.eu/health/tobacco/policy/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• Special Eurobarometer 332/Wave 72.3 TNS Opinion and Social. ‘Survey on Tobacco’, European Commission; 2010. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_332_sum_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Champion D, Chapman S. Framing pub smoking bans: an analysis of Australian print news media coverage, March 1996–March 2003. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005;59:679–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helme WD, Ron B, Walter Y, Colleen N, David BB. The development and validation of a coding protocol to measure change in tobacco-control newspaper coverage. Health Promot Pract 2006;7(1):103–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siebel C. How the Press Framed New York City's Smoking Ban: An Analysis of Newspaper Coverage. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal Convention Center. (Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 11/08/2006). Available at http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p105026_index.html; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ratzan CS. Health literacy: communication for the public good. Health Promot Int 2001;16(2):207–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkin CK, Wallack L. Mass communication and public health: complexities and conflicts. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Entman MR. Cascading activation: contesting the White House's frame after 9/11. Polit Commun 2003;20:415–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman MR. Framing bias: media in the distribution of power. J Commun 2007;57:163–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (eds.). Choices, values and frames. New York: Cambridge University Press and the Russell Sage Foundation; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman AJ, Salovey P. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. Psychol Bull 1997;121:3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seon-Kyoung A, Gower KK. How do the news media frame crises? A content analysis of crisis news coverage. Public Relations Rev 2009;35:107–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silk K, Atkin CK, Salmon C. Developing effective media campaigns for health promotion. In: , Thompson TL, Parrott R, Nussbaum J, (eds.) Handbook of health communication. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2011. p. 203–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wallack L, Dorfman L. Putting policy into health communication: the role of media advocacy. In: , Rice RE, Atkin CK, (eds.) Public communication campaigns. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001. p. 389–401.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson AW. Talking politics. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson AW, Modigliani A. Media discourse and public opinion in nuclear power: a constructionist approach. Am J Sociol. (1987, p.143; 1989, p.43)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson AW, Croteau D, Hoynes W, Sasson T. Media images and the social construction of reality. Ann. Rev. Sociol.1992;18:373–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow DA, Benford RD. Master frames and cycles of protest. In , Morris A, Mueller C, (eds.) Frontiers of social movement theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy JD, Zald MN. Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar