Getting the message: Framing food recall messages to increase consumer protection motivations

References

• Hallman WK, Cuite L, Hooker H. Consumer responses to food recalls: 2008 National Survey Report. (Publication Number RR-0109-018). New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Food Policy Institute; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• CDC.gov [Internet]. Estimates of foodborne illness in the United States; 2012. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/foodborneburden/.
   Google Scholar
• Food Product Design.com [Internet]. Survey illustrates consumer food safety fears; 2008. Available from: http://www.foodproductdesign.com/hotnews/survey-illustrates-consumer-food-safety-fears.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979;47:263–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu JT, Hsieh CR. Risk perception and smoking behavior: empirical evidence from Taiwan. J Risk Uncertain 1995;11:139–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman AJ, Salovey P. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. Psychol Bull 1997;121:3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan RJ, Jalleh G. Positive versus negative framing of a hypothetical infant immunization: the influence of involvement. Health Educ Behav 2000;27:82–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick S, Carpentier FD, Blumhoff A, Nickel N. Selective exposure effects for positive and negative news: Testing the robustness of the informational utility model. J Mass Commun Q, 2005;82:181–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertain 1992;5:297–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers R. Cognitive and physiological process in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of protection motivation. In: Cacioppo J, Petty R (eds.) Social psychophysiology: a source book. New York: Guilford Press; 1983. p. 153–76.
   Google Scholar
• Keller PA, Block LG. When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related behavior. J Mark Res 1995;32:192–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorn L, Brown B. Making sense of invulnerability at work: a quantitative study of police drivers. Saf Sci 2003;41:837–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson TD, Kraft DS, Lisle DJ. Introspection, attitude change, and attitude behavior consistency: the disruptive effects of explaining why we feel the way we do. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 1989;22:287–343.
   Google Scholar
• Robberson MR, Rogers R. Beyond fear appeals: negative and positive persuasive appeals to health and self-esteem. J Appl Soc Psychol 1988;18:277–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerowitz BE, Chaiken S. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987;52:500–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks SM, Salovey P, Greene S, Rothman A, Moyer A, Beauvais J, et al. The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psychol 1995;14:178–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon G, Block L, Ramanathan S. We're at as much risk as we are led to believe: Effects of message cues on judgments of health risk. J Consum Res 2002;28:533–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the foundation of agency. In: Perrig WJ, Alexander G (eds.) Control of human behavior, mental processes, and consciousness. New Jersey: Erlbaum; 2000. p. 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Beck K, Lund A. The effects of health threat seriousness and personal efficacy upon intentions and behavior. J Appl Soc Behav 1981;11:401–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddux JE, Rogers R. Protection motivation and self-efficacy: a revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. J Exp Soc Psychol 1982;19:469–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block LG, Keller PA. When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health related behavior. J Mark Res 1995;32:192–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers R, Mewborn C. Fear appeals and attitude change: Effect of a threat's noxiousness, probability of occurrence and the efficacy of coping appraisals. J Pers Soc Psychol 1976;34:54–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotter J. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol Monog 1966;1:1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington SJ. The effect of codes of ethics and personal denial of responsibility on computer abuse judgments and intentions. MIS Q 1996;20:257–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workman M, Bommer WH, Straub D. Security lapses and the omission of information security measures: a threat control model and empirical test. Comput Hum Behav 2008;24:2799–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora R, Stoner C, Arora A. Using framing and credibility to incorporate exercise and fitness in individuals' lifestyle. J Consum Mark 2006;23:199–207.
   Google Scholar
• Freberg K. Using the theory of planned behavior to predict intention to comply with food recall message. Health Commun 2012;28(4):359–365; DOI:10.1080/10410236.2012.688657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein M, Cappella JN. The role of theory in developing effective health communications. J Commun 2006;56:S1–S17; DOI: 10.1111/j.1460–2466.2006.00280.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boer H, Seydel ER. Protection motivation theory. In Conner M, Norman P, (eds.) Predicting health behavior: Research and practice with social cognition models. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1996. p. 95–120.
   Google Scholar
• Matos C, Rossi C. Consumer reaction to product recalls: factors influencing product judgment and behavioral intentions. Intl J Cons Stud 2007;31:109–16.
   Google Scholar
• Sherer M, Maddux JE, Mercandante B, Prentice-Dunn S, Jacobs B, Rogers W. The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychol Reports 1982;51:663–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duhachek A. Coping: a multidimensional, hierarchical framework of responses to stressful consumption episodes. J Cons Res 2005;32(1):41–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner JF, Hunt JB, Eppright DR. The protection motivation model: a normative model of fear appeals. J Mark 1991;55:36–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell SJ, Goldsmith RE. The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility. J Bus Res 2001;52:235–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy J, Maheswaran D. Exploring message framing outcomes when systematic, heuristic, or both types of processing occur. J Cons Psychol 2004;1:159–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb GM. [Internet].When workers turn into 'turkers'. Christian Science Monitor, 2006. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker D. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 1981;18:39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell AM, Rudd JM. Factor analysis and discriminant validity: a brief review of some practical issues. Paper presented at the Australia-New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference (ANZMAC), Melbourne, Australia, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981;211:453–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keefe DJ. The advantages of compliance or the disadvantages of non-compliance? A meta-analytic review of the relative persuasiveness of gain and loss-framed messages. Commun Yearbook 2006;30:1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Jones LW, Sinclair RC, Courneya KS. The effects of source credibility and message framing on exercise intentions, behaviors, and attitudes: an integration of the elaboration likelihood model and prospect theory. J Appl Soc Psychol 2003;33:179–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte K. Fear control and danger control: a test of the extended parallel process model. Commun Monogr 1994;6:113–13.
   Google Scholar
• Arora R. Message framing strategies for new and mature products. J Product Brand Manage 2007;16:377–85.
   Google Scholar