Perceptions of design quality: An eye tracking study of attention and appeal in health advertisements

References

• Dake D. Aesthetics theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Joffe H. The power of visual material: persuasion, emotion and identification. Diogenes 2008;55:84–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garber LL, Hyatt EM. Color as tool for visual persuasion. In: Scott LM, Batra R, (eds.) Persuasive imagery: a consumer response perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Juni S, Gross JS. Emotional and persuasive perception in fonts. Percept Motor Skill 2008;106:35–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieter R, Wedel M. Attention capture and transfer in advertising: brand, pictorial, and text-size effects. J Mark 2004;68:36–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieter R, Wedel M, Batra R. The stopping power of advertising: measures and effects of visual complexity. J Mark 2010;74:48–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donderi DC. Visual complexity: a review. Psychol Bull 2006;132:73–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlyne DE. Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Washington: Hemisphere Pub. Corp; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Duck JM, Terry DJ, Hogg MA. The perceived influence of AIDS advertising: third-person effects in the context of positive media content. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 1995;17:305–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sillence E, Briggs P, Harris P, Fishwick L. Health websites that people can trust – the case of hypertension. Interact Comput 2007;19:32–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houts PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, Loscalzo MJ. The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of reserach on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns 2006;61:173–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aakhus M. Communication as design. Commun Monogr 2007;74:112–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aakhus M, Jackson S. Technology, interaction, and design. In: Fitch KL, Sanders RE, (eds.) Handbook of language and social interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Donderi DC, McFadden S. Compressed file length predicts search time and errors on visual displays. Displays 2005;26:71–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geissler GL, Zinkhan GM, Watson RT. The influence of home page complexity on consumer attention, attitudes, and purchase intent. J Advert 2006;35:69–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandir M, Knight J. Homepage aesthetics: the search for preference factors and the challenges of subjectivity. Interact Comput 2006;18:1351–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuch AN, Presslaber EE, Stocklin M, Opwis K, Bargas-Avila JA. The role of visual complexity and prototypicality regarding first impression of websites: working towards understanding aesthetic judgments. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2012;70:794–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlyne DE. The influence of complexity and novelty in visual figures on orienting responses. J Exp Psychol 1958;55:289–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kosslyn SM. Information representation in visual images. Cog Psychol 1975;7:341–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball MA. Visual design principles: an empirical study of design lore. Technical Writing Commun 2013;43:3–41.
   Google Scholar
• Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH. Teaching patients with low literacy skills. Philadelphia: J B Lippincott; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin J, McKenna K, Tooth L. Written health education materials: making them more effective. Aust Occup Ther J 2003;50:170–7.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson R. Informational design-principles and guidelines. J Visual Literacy 2010;29:167–82.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgaard G, Fernandes G, Dudek C, Brown J. Attention web designers: you have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! Behav Inf Technol 2006;25:115–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tractinsky N, Cokhavi A, Kirschenbaum M, Sharfi T. Evaluating the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of web pages. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2006;64:1071–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgaard G, Dudek C, Sen D, Sumegi L, Noonan P. An exploration of relations between visual appeal, trustworthiness and perceived usability of homepages. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 2011;18:1:1–1:30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazard, A., Mackert, M. User evaluations of design complexity: The impact of visual perceptions for effective online health communication. Int J M Inform, 2014; 83(10), 726–735.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson WP. The third-person effect in communication. Public Opin Quart 1983;47:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien SH. No more top-heavy bias: infants and adults prefer upright faces but not top-heavy geometric or face-like patterns. J Vis 2011;11:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox RJ, Krugman DM, Fletcher JE, Fischer PM. Adolescents’ attention to beer and cigarette print ads and associated product warnings. J Advert 1998;27:57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson EB, Thomsen S, Lindsay G, John K. Adolescents’ attention to traditional and graphic tobacco warning labels: an eye-tracking approach. J Drug Educ 2010;40:227–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton PR, McMurray I, Brownlow C. One factor analysis of variance. SPSS explained. New York: Routledge; 2014. p. 157–88.
   Google Scholar
• Field A. Repeated Measures ANOVA. 2012; Available from: http://www.statisticshell.com/docs/repeatedmeasures.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tuch AN, Bargas-Avila JA, Opwis K, Wilhelm FH. Visual complexity of websites: effeccts on users’ experience, physiology, performance, and memory. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2009;67:703–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djamasbi S, Siegel M, Tullis T, Generation Y. Web design, and eye tracking. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2010;68:307–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein AM, Zwickel J, Prinz W, Frith U. Animated triangles: an eye tracking investigation. Q J Exp Psychol 2009;62:1189–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar