Publication Cover
Cochlear Implants International
An Interdisciplinary Journal for Implantable Hearing Devices
Volume 13, 2012 - Issue 1
457
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Multicentre investigation on electrically evoked compound action potential and stapedius reflex: how do these objective measures relate to implant programming parameters?

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 26-34 | Published online: 18 Jul 2013

References

  • Akin I., Kuran G., Saka C., Vural M. 2006. Preliminary results on correlation between neural response imaging and, most comfortable levels' in cochlear implantation. The Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 120(4): 261–265.
  • Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Gantz B. 1990. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88: 1385–1391.
  • Brown C.J., Hughes M.L., Luk B. 2000. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear and Hearing, 21(2): 151–163.
  • Cafarelli-Dees D., Dillier N., Lai W.K., Von Wallenberg E., Van Dijk B., Akdas F., Aksit M., Batman C., Beynon A., Burdo S., Chanal J-M, Collet L., Conway M., Coudert C., Craddock L., Cullington H., Deggouj N., Fraysse B., Grabel S., Kiefer J., Kiss J.G., Lenarz T., Mair A., Maunes S., Müller-Deile J., Piron J-P, Razza S., Tasche C., Thai-Van H., Toth F., Truy E., Uziel A., Smoorenburg G.F. 2005. Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system. Audiology & Neuro-otology, 10(2): 105–116.
  • Caner G., Olgun L., Gültekin G., Balaban M. 2007. Optimizing fitting in children using objective measures such as neural response imaging and electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold. Otology & Neurotology, 28(5): 637–640.
  • Charlet de Sauvage R., Cazals Y., Erre J.P., Aran J-M 1983. Acoustically derived auditory nerve action potential evoked by electrical stimulation: an estimation of the waveform of single unit contribution. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73: 616–627.
  • Dahm M., Shepherd RK, Clark G.M. 1993. The post-natal growth of the temporal bone and its implications for cochlear implantation in children. Acta Otolaryngologica Supplementum, 505: 1–39.
  • Franck K.H., Norton S.J. 2001. Estimation of psychophysical levels using the electrically evoked compound action potential measured with the neural response telemetry capabilities of Cochlear Corporation's CI24M device. Ear & Hearing, 22(4): 289–299.
  • Frijns J.H., Briaire J.J., de Laat J.A., Grote J.J. 2002. Initial evaluation of the Clarion CII cochlear implant: speech perception and neural response imaging. Ear and Hearing, 23: 184–197.
  • Gordon K.A., Ebinger K.A., Gilden J.E., Shapiro W.H. 2002. Neural response telemetry in 12- to 24-month-old children. The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, & Laryngology Supplement, 189: 42–48.
  • Han D.M., Chen X.Q., Zhao X.T., Kong Y., Li Y-X, Liu S., Liu B., Mo L-Y 2005. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 125: 732–735.
  • Hodges A.V., Butts S.L., King J.E. 2003. Electrically evoked stapedial reflexes: utility in cochlear implant patients. In: , HE Cullington (ed). Cochlear Implants: Objective Measures. London: Whurr Publishers, p. 81–93.
  • Hughes M.L., Brown C.J., Abbas P.J. 2000. Comparison of EAP threshold with MAP levels in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children. Ear and Hearing, 21: 164–174.
  • Hughes M.L., VanderWerff K.R., Brown C.J. 2001. A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in nucleus 24 cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 22(6): 471–486.
  • Jerger J., Jenkins H., Fifer R., Mecklenburg D. 1986. Stapedius reflex to electrical stimulation in a patient with a cochlear implant. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, & Laryngology, 95(2 Pt 1): 151–157.
  • Lesinski-Schiedat A., Illg A., Warnecke A., Heermann R., Bertram B., Lenarz T. 2006. Paediatric cochlear implantation in the first year of life: preliminary results. HNO, 54(7): 565–572
  • McConkey Robbins A., Burton Koch D., Osberger M.J., Zimmerman-Philips S., Kishon-Rabin L. 2004. Effect of age at cochlear implantation on auditory skill development in infants and toddlers. Archives of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, 130: 570–574.
  • Niemeyer W., Sesterhenn G. 1974. Calculating the hearing threshold from the Stapedius reflex threshold for different sound stimuli. International Journal of Audiology, 13(5): 421–427.
  • Stephan K., Welzl-Müller K. 2000. Post-operative stapedius reflex tests with simultaneous loudness scaling in patients supplied with cochlear implants. Audiology, 39: 13–18.
  • Zimmerling M.J., Hochmair E.S. 2002. EAP recordings in Ineraid patients-correlations with psychophysical measures and possible implications for patient fitting. Ear and Hearing, 23: 81–91.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.