Advanced search
Publication Cover
Cochlear Implants International
An Interdisciplinary Journal for Implantable Hearing Devices
Volume 12, 2011 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,180
Views
48
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Development and evaluation of the modiolar research array – multi-centre collaborative study in human temporal bones

Robert J S BriggsUniversity of Melbourne and HEARing CRCMelbourne, AustraliaCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Michael TykocinskiUniversity of Melbourne and HEARing CRCMelbourne, Australia
,
Roland LazsigUniversität Freiburg, Germany
,
Antje AschendorffUniversität Freiburg, Germany
,
Thomas LenarzMedizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany
,
Timo StöverMedizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany
,
Bernard FraysseHôpital PurpanToulouse, France
,
Mathieu MarxHôpital PurpanToulouse, France
,
J Thomas RolandNew York University, USA
,
Peter S RolandUniversity of Texas, Southwestern, USA
,
Charles G WrightUniversity of Texas, Southwestern, USA
,
Bruce J GantzThe University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, USA
,
James F PatrickCochlear LimitedSydney, Australia
&
Frank RisiCochlear LimitedSydney, Australia
 show all
Pages 129-139 | Published online: 18 Jul 2013

References

  • Adunka O., Kiefer J. 2006. Impact of electrode insertion depth on intracochlear trauma. Otolaryngology – Head Neck Surgery, 135(3): 374–382.
  • Adunka O., Kiefer J., Unkelback M.H., Lehnert T., Gstoettner W. 2004. Development and evaluation of an improved cochlear implant electrode design for electric acoustic stimulation. Laryngoscope, 114(7): 1237–1241.
  • Aschendorff A., Kubalek R., Turowski B., Zanella F., Hochmuth A., Schumacher M., et al. 2005. Quality control after cochlear implant surgery by means of rotational tomography. Otology & Neurotology, 26(1): 34–37.
  • Aschendorff A., Kromeier J., Klenzner T., Laszig R. 2007. Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear and Hearing, 28(2): 75S–79S.
  • Büchner A., Schüssler M., Battmer R.D., Stöver T., Lesinski-Schiedat A., Lenarz T. 2009. Impact of low-frequency hearing. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 14(1): 8–13.
  • Escudé B., James C., Deguine O., Cochard N., Eter E., Fraysse B. 2006. The size of the cochlea and predictions of insertion depth angles for cochlear implant electrodes. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 11(1): 27–33.
  • Eshraghi A.A., Yang N.W., Balkany T.J. 2003. Comparative study of cochlear damage with three perimodiolar electrode designs. Laryngoscope, 113: 415–419.
  • Finley C., Holden A.T., Holden K.L., Whiting B.R., Chole R.A., Neely J.G., et al. 2008. Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes. Otology & Neurotology, 29(7): 920–928.
  • Fraysse B., Macías Á.R., Sterkers O., Burdo S., Ramsden R., Deguine O., et al. 2006. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance cochlear implant. Otology & Neurotology, 27: 624–663.
  • Gantz B.G., Turner C. 2004. Combining acoustic and electric speech processing: iowa/nucleus hybrid implant. Acta Otolaryngologica, 124(4): 344–347.
  • Gantz B.J., Turner C., Gfeller K.E., Lowder M.W. 2005. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope, 115(5): 796–802.
  • Ilberg V.C., Kiefer J., Tillein J., Pfennigdorff T., Hartmann R., Stürzebecher E., et al. 1999. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. ORL, 61: 334–340.
  • James C., Albegger K., Battmer R., Burdo S., Deggouj N., Deguine O., et al. 2005. Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why. Acta Otolaryngologica, 125: 481–491.
  • Lenarz T., Stöver T., Buechner A., Paasche G., Briggs R., Risi F., et al. 2006. Temporal bone results and hearing preservation with a new straight electrode. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 11(1): 34–41.
  • Radeloff A., Unkelbach M.H., Mack M.G., Settevendemie C., Helbig S., Mueller J., et al. 2009. A coated electrode carrier for cochlear implantation reduces insertion forces. Laryngoscope, 119(5): 959–963.
  • Roland J.T. 2005. A model for cochlear implant electrode insertion and force evaluation: results with a new electrode design and insertion technique. The Laryngoscope, 115: 1325–1339.
  • Skarzynski H., Lorens A., Piotrowska A., Anderson I. 2006. Partial deafness cochlear implantation provides benefit to a new population of individuals with hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngologica, 126: 934–940.
  • Skinner M.W., Holden T.A., Whiting B.R., Voie A.H., Brunsden B., Neely J.G., et al. 2007. In vivo estimates of the position of advanced bionics electrode arrays in the human cochlea. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 116(4): 1–24.
  • Todd C.A., Naghdy F., Svehla M.J. 2007. Force application during cochlear implant insertion: an analysis for improvement of surgeon technique. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 54(7): 1247–1255.
  • Wright C.G., Roland P.S. 2005. Temporal bone microdissection for anatomic study of cochlear implant electrodes. Cochlear Implants International, 6: 159–168.
  • Xu J., Briggs R., Tykocinksi M., Newbold C., Risi F., Cowan R. 2009. Seeing electrode movement in the cochlea: micro-focus fluoroscopy – a great tool for electrode development. Cochlear Implants International, 10: 115–119.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.