Combined electric and acoustic hearing performance with Zebra^® speech processor: Speech reception, place, and temporal coding evaluation

References

• Brockmeier S.J., Peterreins M., Lorens A., Vermeire K., Helbig S., Anderson I., Skarzynski H., Van De Heyning P., Gstoettner W., Kiefer J. 2010. Music perception in electric acoustic stimulation users as assessed by the Mu.S.I.C. test. Advances in Otorhinolaryngology, 67: 70–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daemers K., Yperman M., De Beukelaer C., De Saegher G., De Ceulaer G., Govaerts P.J. 2006. Normative data of the A§E discrimination and identification tests in preverbal children. Cochlear Implants International, 7: 107–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Damman W. 1990. De Brugse lijsten voor spraakaudiometrie-versie 1989. Tijdschrift voor Logopedie en Audiologie, 20: 21.
   Google Scholar
• Di Lella F., Bacciu A., Pasanisi E., Vincenti V., Guida M., Bacciu S. 2009. Main peak interleaved sampling (MPIS) strategy: effect of stimulation rate variations on speech perception in adult cochlear implant recipients using the Digisonic SP cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngologica, 130: 102–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman M.F., Gifford R.H., Spahr A.J., Mckarns S.A. 2008. The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies. Audiology Neuro-otology, 13: 105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman K.E., Shannon R.V., Slattery W.H. 1997. Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 40: 1201–1215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen L.M., Shannon R.V., Baskent D., Wang X. 2001. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110: 1150–1163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Q.J., Shannon R.V., Wang X. 1998. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104: 3586–3596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz B.J., Turner C., Gfeller K.E. 2006. Acoustic plus electric speech processing: preliminary results of a multicenter clinical trial of the Iowa/nucleus hybrid implant. Audiology and Neurootology, 11( Suppl 1): 63–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gantz B.J., Turner C.W. 2003. Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. Laryngoscope, 113: 1726–1730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller K., Turner C., Oleson J., Zhang X., Gantz B., Froman R., Olszewski C. 2007. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise. Ear and Hearing, 28: 412–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnansia D., Pean V., Meyer B., Lorenzi C. 2009. Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine structure degradation on speech masking release. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125: 4023–4033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govaerts P.J., Daemers K., Yperman M., De Beukelaer C., De Saegher G., De Ceulaer G. 2006. Auditory speech sounds evaluation (A§E): a new test to assess detection, discrimination and identification in hearing impairment. Cochlear Implants International, 7: 92–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gstoettner W., Helbig S., Settevendemie C., Baumann U., Wagenblast J., Arnoldner C. 2009. A new electrode for residual hearing preservation in cochlear implantation: first clinical results. Acta Otolaryngologica, 129: 372–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gstoettner W.K., Van De Heyning P., O'connor A.F., Morera C., Sainz M., Vermeire K., Mcdonald S., Cavalle L., Helbig S., Valdecasas J.G., Anderson I., Adunka O.F. 2008. Electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a multi-centre investigation. Acta Otolaryngologica, 128: 968–975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeren W.F.L., Coene M., Vaerenberg B., Avram A., Cardinaletti A., del Bo L., Pascu A., Volpato F., Govaerts P.J. 2012. Development of the A§E test battery for assessment of pitch perception in speech. Cochlear Implants International, 13: 206–219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helbig S., Baumann U., Helbig M., Von Malsen-Waldkirch N., Gstoettner W. 2008. A new combined speech processor for electric and acoustic stimulation – eight months experience. ORL Journal for Otorhinolaryngology and its Related Specialties, 70: 359–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins K., Moore B.C.J., Stone M.A. 2008. Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123: 1140–1153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James C.J., Fraysse B., Deguine O., Lenarz T., Mawman D., Ramos A., Ramsden R., Sterkers O. 2006. Combined electroacoustic stimulation in conventional candidates for cochlear implantation. Audiology Neurootology, 11( Suppl 1): 57–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiefer J., Hohl S., Sturzebecher E., Pfennigdorff T., Gstoettner W. 2001. Comparison of speech recognition with different speech coding strategies (SPEAK, CIS, and ACE) and their relationship to telemetric measures of compound action potentials in the nucleus CI 24M cochlear implant system. Audiology, 40: 32–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lazard D.S., Bordure P., Lina-Granade G., Magnan J., Meller R., Meyer B., Radafy E., Roux P.E., Gnansia D., Pean V., Truy E. 2010. Speech perception performance for 100 post-lingually deaf adults fitted with Neurelec cochlear implants: comparison between Digisonic® Convex and Digisonic® SP devices after a 1-year follow-up. Acta Otolaryngologica, 130(11): 1267–1273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenarz T. 2009. Electro-acoustic stimulation of the cochlea. Editorial. Audiology Neurootology, 14( Suppl 1): 1.
   Google Scholar
• Lenarz T., Stover T., Buechner A., Lesinski-Schiedat A., Patrick J., Pesch J. 2009. Hearing conservation surgery using the Hybrid-L electrode. Results from the first clinical trial at the Medical University of Hannover. Audiology Neurootology, 14( Suppl 1): 22–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi C., Debruille L., Garnier S., Fleuriot P., Moore B.C.J. 2009. Abnormal auditory temporal processing for frequencies where absolute thresholds are normal. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125: 27–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi C., Gilbert G., Carn H., Garnier S., Moore B.C.J. 2006. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 103: 18866–18869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2007. Cochlear hearing loss: physiological, psychological and technical issues. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2008. The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 9: 399–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentiss S., Sykes K., Staecker H. 2010. Partial deafness cochlear implantation at the University of Kansas: techniques and outcomes. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 21: 197–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon R. 1992. Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(4 Pt 1): 2156–2164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner C.W., Gantz B.J., Vidal C., Behrens A., Henry B.A. 2004. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115: 1729–1735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaerenberg B., Pascu A., Del Bo L., Schauwers K., De Ceulaer G., Daemers K., Coene M., Govaerts P.J. 2011. Clinical assessment of pitch perception. Otology and Neurotology, 32: 736–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Ilberg C., Kiefer J., Tillein J., Pfenningdorff T., Hartmann R., Stã1/4Rzebecher E., Klinke R. 1999. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 61: 334–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters J., Damman W., Bosman A. 1995. Evaluation of Flemish-Dutch materials for speech audiometry. In: , Schoonhoven R., Kapteyn T., De Laat J.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the European Conference on Audiology. The Netherlands: Noordwijkerhout.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng F.G. 2002. Temporal pitch in electric hearing. Hearing Research, 174: 101–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar