References
- Advanced Bionics. 2012a. ClearVoice technical facts. Valencia, CA: Advanced Bionics.
- Advanced Bionics. 2012b. ClearVoice clinical results. Valencia, CA: Advanced Bionics.
- American National Standards Institute. R2008. Maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms. (S3.1–1999). New York.
- Boothroyd A., Hnath-Chisolm T., Hanin L., Kishon-Rabin L. 1988. Voice fundamental frequency as an auditory supplement to the speechreading of sentences. Ear and Hearing, 9(6): 306–312.
- Brendel M., Buechner A., Krueger B., Frohne-Buechner C., Lenarz T. 2008. Evaluation of the Harmony sound processor in combination with the speech coding strategy HiRes 120. Otology and Neurotology, 29(2): 199–202.
- Buechner A., Brendel M., Saalfeld H., Litvak L., Frohne-Buechner C., Lenarz T. 2010. Results of a pilot study with a signal enhancement algorithm for HiRes 120 cochlear implant users. Otology and Neurotology, 31(9): 1386–1390.
- Carney E., Schlauch R.S. 2007. Critical difference table for word recognition testing derived using computer simulation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 50(5): 1203–1209.
- Compton-Conley C.L., Neuman A.C., Killion M.C., Levitt H. 2004. Performance of directional microphones for hearing aids: real-world versus simulation. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 15(6): 440–455.
- Donaldson G.S., Chisolm T.H., Blasco G.P., Shinnick L.J., Ketter K.J., Krause J.C. 2009. BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication abilities in cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 30(4): 401–410.
- Etymotic Research. 2005. BKB-SIN Speech-in-Noise Test, Version 1.03. Elk Grove Village, IL: Etymotic Research.
- Firszt J.B., Holden L.K., Reeder R.M., Skinner M.W. 2009. Speech Recognition in cochlear implant recipients: Comparison of standard HiRes and HiRes 120 sound processing. Otology and Neurotology, 30(2): 146–152.
- George E.L., Festen J.M., Hourgast T. 2008. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(2): 1269–1277.
- Gifford R.H., Revit L.J. 2010. Speech perception for adult cochlear implant recipients in a realistic background noise: Effectiveness of preprocessing strategies and external options for improving speech recognition in noise. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 21(7): 441–451.
- Kam A.C.S., Ng I.H.Y., Cheng M.M.Y., Wong T.K.C., Tong M.C.F. 2012. Evaluation of the ClearVoice strategy in adults using HiResolution Fidelity 120 sound processing. Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 5(S1): S89–S92.
- Killion M.C., Niquette P.A., Gudmundsen G.I., Revit L.J., Banerjee S. 2004. Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(4): 2395–2405.
- Nabelek A.K., Freyaldenhoven M.C., Tampas J.W., Burchfield S.B., Muenchen R.A. 2006. Acceptable noise level as a predictor of hearing aid use. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 17(9): 626–639.
- Nilsson M., Soli S., Sullivan J.A. 1994. Development of the hearing in noise test for measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95(2): 1085–1099.
- Revit L.J., Schulien R.B., Julstrom S. 2002. Toward accurate assessment of real-world hearing aid benefit. Hearing Review, 9: 34–38, 51.
- Revit L.J., Killion M.C., Compton-Conley C.L. 2007. Developing and testing a laboratory sound system that yields accurate real-world results. Hearing Review, 14(11): 54–62.
- Simpson S.A., Cooke M. 2005. Consonant identification in N-talker babble is a nonmonotonic function of N (L). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(5): 2775–2778.
- Spahr A.J., Dorman M.F. 2005. Effects of minimum stimulation settings for the Med El Tempo+ speech processor on speech understanding. Ear and Hearing, 26(4): 2S–6S.
- Thornton A.R., Raffin M.J. 1978. Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21(3): 507–518.