Audiogram and cochlear implant candidacy – UK perspective

References

• Advanced Bionics. 2012. Cochlear implants 101, adult candidacy [accessed 2012 Oct 15]. Available from: https://advancedbionics.adobeconnect.com/_a855095194/p53747590/
   Google Scholar
• Berrettini S., Arslan E., Baggiani A., Burdo S., Cassandro E., Cuda D., et al. 2011. Analysis of the impact of professional involvement in evidence generation for the HTA process, subproject ‘cochlear implants’: methodology, results and recommendations. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica, 31(5): 273–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond M., Mealing S., Anderson R., Elston J., Weiner G., Taylor R.S., et al. 2009. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model. Health Technology Assessment, 13(44): 1–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Society of Audiology (BSA). 2004. Recommended procedure – pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry with and without masking and determination of uncomfortable loudness levels. March 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Cochlear. 2012. Candidacy [accessed 2012 Oct 15]. Available from: http://www.cochlear.com/wps/wcm/connect/us/for-professionals/cochlear-implants/Candidacy/Candidacy
   Google Scholar
• De Raeve L., Wouters A. 2013. Accessibility to cochlear implants in Belgium: state of the art on selection, reimbursement, habilitation, and outcomes in children and adults. Cochlear Implants International, 14(Suppl 1): S18–S25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erdman S., Demorest M. 1998. Adjustment to hearing impairment II: audiological and demographic correlates. Journal of Speech Language Hearing Research, 41: 123–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis H.W., Chee N., Yeagle J., Cheng A., Niparko J.K. 2002. Impact of CIs on the functional health status of older adults. Laryngoscope, 112(8): 1482–1488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland D.R., Venick H.S., Niparko J.K. 2003. Choice of ear for cochlear implantation: the effect of history and residual hearing on predicted postoperative performance. Otology & Neurotology, 24: 582–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopinath B., Schneider J., McMahon C.M., Teber E., Leeder S.R., Mitchell P. 2012. Severity of age-related hearing loss is associated with impaired activities of daily living. Age and Ageing, 41: 195–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopinath B., Wang J.J., Schneider J., Burlutsky G., Snowdon J., McMahon C.M., et al.. 2009. Depressive symptoms among older hearing impaired adults: the Blue Mountains Study. Journal of American Geriatric Society, 57: 1306–1308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpin C., Rauch D.S. 2009. Clinical implications of a damaged cochlea: pure tone thresholds vs. information carrying capacity. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 140: 473–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz A.R., Dubno J.R., Ahlstrom J.B. 2002. Recognition of low-pass-filtered consonants in noise with normal and impaired high-frequency hearing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111: 409–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpa M.J., Gopinath B., Beath K., Rochtchina E., Cumming R.G., Wang J.J., et al. 2010. Associations between hearing impairment and mortality risk in older persons: the Blue Mountains Hearing Study. Annals of Epidemiology, 20: 452–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemkens N., Vermeire K., Brokx J.P.L., Fransen E., Van Camp G., Van De Heyning P.H. 2002. Interpretation of pure-tone thresholds in sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL): a review of measurement variability and age specific responses. Acta Oto Rhino Larynologica Belgica, 56: 341–352.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manchaiah V.K.C. 2011. New degree/severity classification for audiogram: what do audiologists have to say? (accessed 25 Jan 2013). Available from http://www.audiologyonline.com/E/19231/129639/c30c73797921e3a61d
   Google Scholar
• Manchaiah V.K.C., Freeman B. 2011. Audiogram: is there a need for change in the approach to categorise degree/severity of hearing loss? International Journal of Audiology, 50: 638–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medel. 2012. Candidacy for cochlear implants [accessed 2012 Oct 15]. Available from: http://www.medel.com/int/show/index/id/66/titel/Cochlear+Implants?PHPSESSID=ibsrd53cvlj8ah3s2japnee441
   Google Scholar
• Mulrow C.D., Aguilar C., Endicott J.E., Velez R., Tuley M.R., Charlip W.S., et al. 1990. Association between hearing impairment and the quality of life of elderly individuals. Journal of American Geriatric Society, 38(1): 45–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Technology Appraisal Guidance. 2009. Cochlear implants for children and adults with severe to profound deafness, 169. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Raine C.H., Craddock L., Lutman M.E. 2010. UK appraisal of clinical and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implantation by the national institute for health and clinical excellence. Cochlear Implants International, 11(1): 138–142.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein J.T., Parkinson W.S., Tyler R.S., Gantz B.J. 1999. Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. American Journal of Otolaryngology, 20: 445–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens D., Kramer S.E. 2009. Living with hearing difficulties: the process of enablement. 1st ed. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Turner C.W. 2006. Hearing loss and the limits of amplification. Audiology and Neurotology, 11(Suppl 1): 2–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner C.W., Brus S.L. 2001. Providing low and mid frequency speech information to listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109: 2999–3006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Health Care Policy. 2013 [accessed 22 Jul 2013]. Available from: https://www.unitedhealthcareonline.com/ccmcontent/ProviderII/UHC/en-US/Assets/ProviderStaticFiles/ProviderStaticFilesPdf/Tools%20and%20Resources/Policies%20and%20Protocols/Medical%20Policies/Medical%20Policies/Cochlear_Implants.pdf
   Google Scholar