Explaining transit ridership: What has the evidence shown?

References

• Abdel-Aty MA. 2001. Using ordered probit modeling to study the effect of ATIS on transit ridership, Transport. Res. C, 9, (4), 265–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Aty MA, Jovanis PP. 1995. The effect of ITS on transit ridership, ITS Q., 3, (2), 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Alperovich G, Kemp MA, Goodman KM. 1977. An econometric model of bus transit demand and supply, Urban Institute, Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• American Public Transportation Association. 2011. Public transportation fact book,. 62nd edn, Washington, DC, American Public Transportation Association.
   Google Scholar
• Baran P, Rodriguez DA, Khattak AJ. 2008. Space syntax and walking in a new urbanist and suburban neighbourhoods, J. Urban Des., 13, (1), 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bello M. 2008. Mass transit breaks records; rail, bus ridership up as gas prices rocket, USA Today, 1 June, http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-06-01-mass-transit_N.htm
   Google Scholar
• Bento A, Cropper M, Mobarak A, Vinha K. 2003. The impact of urban spatial structure on travel demand in the United States, The World Bank, Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenberg E, Evans AE. 2007. Growing the immigrant transit market: Public transit use and California immigrants, Proc. Transportation Research Board Ann. Meet., January 2007 Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenberg E, Shiki K. 2007. Transportation assimilation: Immigrants, race and ethnicity, and mode choice, Proc. Transportation Research Board Ann. Meet., January 2007 Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Brown J, Hess D, Shoup D. 2003. Fare-free public transit at universities: an evaluation, J. Plan. Educ. Res., 23, (1), 69–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JR, Thompson GL. 2008a. Examining the influence of multidestination service orientation on transit service productivity: a multivariate analysis, Transportation, 35, (2), 237–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JR, Thompson GL. 2008b. Service orientation, bus-rail service integration, and transit performance: Examination of 45 U.S. metropolitan areas, Transport. Res. Record, 2042, 82–89.
   Google Scholar
• Brown JR, Thompson GL. 2008c. The relationship between transit ridership and urban decentralisation: Insights from Atlanta, Urban Stud., 45, (5–6), 1119–1139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehler R. 2009. Promoting public transportation: Comparison of transit passengers and policies in Germany and the United States, Transport. Res. Record, 2110, 60–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero R. 1990. Transit pricing research: a review and synthesis, Transportation, 17, (2), 117–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero R. 1993. Ridership impacts of transit-focused development in California. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Chatman DG. 2009. Residential choice, the built environment, and nonwork travel: Evidence using new data and methods, Environ. Plan. A, 41A, (5), 1072–1089.
   Google Scholar
• Chen C, Varley D, Chen J. 2011. What affects transit ridership? A dynamic analysis involving multiple factors, lags and asymmetric behaviour, Urban Stud., 48, (9), 1893–1908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung K. 1997. Estimating the effects of employment, development level, and parking availability on CTA rapid transit ridership: From 1976 to 1995 in Chicago. Metropolitan Conference on Public Transportation Research, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper M. 2009. Transit use hit five-decade high in 2008 as gas prices rose, New York Times, 9 March, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/09/us/09transit.html?partner = rss &emc = rss
   Google Scholar
• Crane R. 2000. The impacts of urban form on travel: An interpretive review, J. Plan. Literat., 15, (1), 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Cravo VS, Cohen J, Williams A. 2009. Impact of weather on transit revenue in New York City, Proc. Transportation Research Board Ann. Meet., January 2009 Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Currie G, Phung J. 2007. Transit ridership, auto gas prices, and world events: New drivers of change? Transport. Res. Record, 1992, 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• De Witte A, Macharis C, Lannoy P, Polain C, Steenberghen T, Van de Walle S. 2006. The impact of free public transport: The case of Brussels, Transport. Res. A, 40A, (8), 671–689.
   Google Scholar
• Dill J. 2006. Evaluating a new urbanist neighborhood, Berkeley Plan. J., 19, 59–78.
   Google Scholar
• Dill J, Kanai T. 2007. Housing choices and travel of older adults: Using AHS and NPTS-NHTS data to plan for the future, Proc. Transportation Research Board Ann. Meet., January 2007 Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Dziekan K, Kottenhoff K. 2006. Dynamic at-stop real-time information displays for public transport: Effects on customers, Transport. Res. A, 41A, (6), 489–501.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 1996. Effectiveness of measures influencing the levels of public transport use in urban areas. Transport Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing R. 1999. Pedestrian- and transit-friendly design: a primer for smart growth, Smart Growth Network.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing R, Forinash CV, Schroeer W. 2005. Neighborhood schools and sidewalk connections: What are the impacts on travel mode choice and vehicle emissions? TR News, 237, 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing R, Handy SL, Brownson R, Clemente O. 2006. Identifying and measuring urban design qualities related to walkability, Proc. Transportation Research Board Ann. Meet., January 2006 Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gaudry M. 1975. An aggregate time series analysis of urban transit demand: The Montreal case, Transport. Res., 9, (4), 249–258.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Ibáñez JA. 1996. Big-city transit, ridership, deficits, and politics, J. Am. Plan. Ass., 62, (1), 30–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Z, Wilson NHM, Rahbee A. 2007. Impact of weather on transit ridership in Chicago, Illinois, Transport. Res. Record., 2034, 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Z, Wilson N. 2011. Assessing the cost of transfer inconvenience in public transport systems: a case study of the London underground, Transport. Res. A, 45A, (2), 91–104.
   Google Scholar
• Haire AR, Machemehl RB. 2007. Impact of rising fuel prices on U.S. transit ridership, Transport. Res. Record., 1992, 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Handy S. (2006). Questioning assumptions: do new urbanists walk more? Planning, 72, (1), 36–37.
   Google Scholar
• Handy SL, Tal G. 2006. Travel behavior of immigrants: analysis of 2001 National Household Travel Survey, Proc. Transportation Research Board Ann. Meet., January 2006 Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hartgen DT, Kinnamon ML. 1999. Comparative performance of major U.S. bus transit systems: 1988–1997. Center for Interdisciplinary Transportation Studies, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks SJ. 2005. Impacts of transit oriented development on public transportation ridership. Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickson C. 1986. A note on the trends in transit commuting in the United States relating to employment in the central business district, Transport. Res. A, 20A, (1), 33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hess D, Yoh A, Iseki H, Taylor BD. 2002. Increasing transit ridership: a survey of successful transit systems in the 1990s, J. Public Transport., 5, (3), 33–66.
   Google Scholar
• Holmgren J. 2007. Meta-analysis of public transport demand, Transport. Res. A, 41A, (10), 1021–1035.
   Google Scholar
• Hu PS, Reuscher TR. 2004. Summary of travel trends: 2001 National Household Travel Survey. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Iseki H, Brian DTaylor 2009. Not all transfers are created equal: Toward a framework relating transfer connectivity to travel behavior, Transport Rev., 29, (6), 777–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iseki H, Taylor BD. 2010. Style versus service? An analysis of user perceptions of transit stops and stations, J. Public Transport., 13, (3), 39–63.
   Google Scholar
• Jia W. 2009. Metrorail trends and markets: Synopsis of recent ridership growth, Transport. Res. Record, 2112, 34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Joh K, Boarnet MG, Nguyen MT, Fulton W, Siembab W, Weaver S. 2008. Accessibility, travel behavior, and new urbanism: Case study of mixed-use centers and auto-oriented corridors in the south bay region of Los Angeles, California, Transport. Res. Record, 2082, 81–89.
   Google Scholar
• Kain JF, Liu Z. 1995. Secrets of success: How Houston and San Diego transit providers achieved large increases in transit ridership. Federal Transit Administration, US Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Kain JF, Liu Z. 1996. An econometric analysis of determinants of transit ridership: 1960–1990. Volpe National Transport Systems Center, US Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Kain JF, Liu Z. 1999. Secrets of success: assessing the large increases in transit ridership achieved by Houston and San Diego transit providers, Transport. Res. A, 33A, (7–8), 601–624.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp MA. 1982. A simultaneous equations analysis of bus route patronage growth in San Diego, Transport. Res. Record, 877, 58–63.
   Google Scholar
• Khattak AJ, Palma AD. 1997. ‘The impact of adverse weather conditions on the propensity to change travel decisions: a survey of Brussels commuters, Transportation. Res. A, 31A, (3), 181–203.
   Google Scholar
• Khattak AJ, Rodriguez D. 2005. Travel behavior in neo-traditional neighborhood developments: a case study in USA, Transport. Res. A, 39, (6), 481–500.
   Google Scholar
• Kitamura R. 1989. A causal analysis of car ownership and transit use, Transportation, 16, (2), 155–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn H. 2000. Factors affecting urban transit ridership. Bridging the Gaps: Canadian Transportation Research Forum, Proc. 35th Ann. Conf., Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada, University of Saskatchewan.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss C. 2008 Gas prices send surge of riders to mass transit, New York Times, 10 May, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/10/business/10transit.html
   Google Scholar
• Kuby M, Barranda A, Upchurch C. 2004. Factors influencing light-rail boardings in the United States, Transport. Res. A, 38A, (3), 223–247.
   Google Scholar
• Kyte M, Stoner J, Cryer JD. 1988. A time series analysis of public transit ridership in Portland, Oregon, Transport. Res. Record, 1036, 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Leck E. 2006. The impact of urban form on travel behavior: a meta-analysis, Berkeley Plan. J., 19, 37–58.
   Google Scholar
• Lei TL, Church RL. 2010. Mapping transit-based access: integrating GIS, routes and schedules, Int. J. Geogr. Inform. Sci., 24, (2), 283–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei TL, Chen Y, Goulias KG. 2012. Opportunity-based dynamic transit accessibility in Southern California: Measurement, findings, and a comparison with automobile accessibility, Proc. Transportation Research Board Ann. Meet., January 2012 Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Litman T. 2008. Valuing transit service quality improvements, J. Public Transport., 11, (2), 43–63.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Z. 1993. Determinants of public transit ridership: analysis of post World War II trends and evaluation of alternative networks. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Maghelal P. 2010. Investigating the relationships among rising fuel prices, increased transit ridership, and CO2 emissions, Transport. Res. D, 16D, (3), 232–35.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod MS, Flannelly KJ, Flannelly L, Behnke RW. 1991. Multivariate time-series model of transit ridership based on historical, aggregate data: The past, present and future of Honolulu, Transport. Res. Record, 1297, 76–84.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer J, Beimborn EA. 1998. Usage, impacts, and benefits of innovative transit pass program, Transport. Res. Record, 1618, 131–38.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadian A, Zhang Y. 2006. National level analysis of lifestyle choices using NHTS, Proc. Transportation Research Board Ann. Meet., January 2006 Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Morral J, Bloger D. 1996. The relationship between downtown parking supply and transit use, ITE J., 66, (2), 32–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhija V, Shoup D. 2006. Quantity versus quality in off-street parking requirements, J. Am. Plan. Assoc., 72, (3), 296–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates. 1995. Primary transit network study (draft). TriMet, Portland, OR, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Nobis C, Lenz B. 2005. Gender differences in travel patterns: role of employment status and household structure. Proc. Conf. on ‘Research on women’s issues in transportation’, Chicago, IL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Peng Z-R, Dueker KJ, Strathman JG, Hopper J. 1997. A simultaneous route-level transit patronage model, Transportation, 24, (2), 159–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polzin SE, Chu X. 2005. Public transit in america: results from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey. National Center for Transit Research.
   Google Scholar
• Pucher J, Renne JL. 2004. Urban-rural differences in mobility and mode choice: Evidence from the 2001 NHTS. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University.
   Google Scholar
• Pushkarev BS, Zupan JM. 1977. Public transportation and land use policy, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Rashidi TH, Mohammadian A, Zhang Y. 2009. Travel behavior and the effects of household demographics and lifestyles, Proc. Transportation Research Board Ann. Meet., January 2009 Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez DA, Khattak AJ, Evenson KR. 2006. Can new urbanism encourage physical activity? Comparing a new urbanist neighborhood with conventional suburbs, J. Am. Plan. Assoc., 72, (1), 43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sale J. 1976. Increasing transit ridership: The experience of seven cities. Urban Mass Transit Administration, US Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Shoup D. 2005a. The high cost of free parking, Planners Press, American Planning Association, Chicago, IL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Shoup D. 2005b. Parking cash out. American Planning Association, Planning Advisory Service, Chicago, IL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Small K, Van Dender K. 2006. Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: the declining rebound effect, Energy J., 28, (1), 25–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small K, van Dender K. 2005. The effect of improved fuel economy on vehicle miles traveled: Estimating the rebound effect using U.S. state data, 1966–2001, University of California Energy Institute, Energy Policy and Economics 014, Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Smart M, Miller MA, Taylor BD. 2008. Transit stops, stations, and transfer facilities: Evaluating performance from the perspective of transit system managers, Proc. Transportation Research Board Ann. Meet., January 2008 Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Spillar RJ, Rutherford GS. 1998. The effects of population density and income on per capita transit ridership in western American cities. Institute of Transportation Engineers Compendium of Technical Papers, Proc. 60th Ann. Meet., Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Syed SJ, Khan AM. 2000. Factor analysis for the study of determinants of public transit ridership, J. Public Transport., 3, (3), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Tang L, Thakuriah P. 2012. Ridership effects of real-time bus information system: A case study of the City of Chicago, Transport. Res. C, 22C, 146–161.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor BD, Haas P, Boyd B, Iseki H, Yoh A. 2002. Increasing transit ridership: lessons from the most successful transit systems in the 1990s. Mineta Transportation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor BD, Iseki H, Miller MA, Smart M. 2009a. Thinking outside the bus: Understanding user perceptions of waiting and transferring in order to increase transit use. Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH), University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor BD, Miller D, Iseki H, Fink C. 2009b. Nature and/or nurture? Analyzing the determinants of transit ridership across US urbanized areas, Transport. Res. A, 43, (1), 60–77.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson GL, Brown JR. 2006. Explaining variation in transit ridership in U.S. metropolitan areas between 1990 and 2000: multivariate analysis, Transport. Res. Record, 1986, 172–181.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson GL, Brown JR, Sharma R, Scheib S. 2006. Where transit use is growing: surprising results, J. Public Transport., 9, (2), 25–43.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans HJP, Zhang J. 2009. Modeling household activity travel behavior: Examples of state of the art modeling approaches and research agenda, Transport. Res. B, 43B, (2), 187–90.
   Google Scholar
• Transit Cooperative Research Program. 1995. Transit ridership initiative. Research Results Digest, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Transit Cooperative Research Program. 1996. Transit and urban form. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade, Douglas Inc., Report 16.
   Google Scholar
• Transit Cooperative Research Program. 1997. Building transit ridership: An exploration of transits market share and the public policies that influence it. Charles River Associates Incorporated, Report 27.
   Google Scholar
• Transit Cooperative Research Program. 1998a. Continuing examination of successful transit ridership initiatives. Research Results Digest, 29.
   Google Scholar
• Transit Cooperative Research Program. 1998b. Strategies to attract auto users to public transportation. Dueker, K. J., Strathman, J. G. and Bianco, M. J., Report 40.
   Google Scholar
• Transit Cooperative Research Program. 1998c. Transit markets of the future: the challenge of change. Rosenbloom, S. and Fielding, G. J., Report 28.
   Google Scholar
• Transit Cooperative Research Program. 2001. Transportation on college and university campuses: a synthesis of transit practice. Miller, J., Synthesis 39.
   Google Scholar
• Transit Cooperative Research Program. 2005. Evaluation of recent ridership increases. Research Results Digest, Stanley, R. G. and Hyman, R., Research Results Digest 69.
   Google Scholar
• Transit Cooperative Research Program. 2007. Elements needed to create high ridership transit systems. TransSystems, Report 111.
   Google Scholar
• Transportation Research Board. 2005. Does the built environment influence physical activity? Examining the evidence. Committee on Physical Activity, Health, Transportation, and Land Use, TRB special report 282.
   Google Scholar
• Transportation Research Board. 2009. Driving and the built environment: the effects of compact development on motorized travel, energy use, and CO2 emissions. National Research Council Committee for the Study on the Relationships among Development Patterns, Vehicle Miles Traveled, and Energy Consumption, TRB special report 298.
   Google Scholar
• US Census Bureau. 2010. Cumulative estimates of population changes for metropolitan statistical areas and rankings: 1 April 2000 to 1 July 2009 (CBSA-EST2009-07). Population Division, Release date: March 2010.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Transportation. 2011. Summary of travel trends: 2009 National Household Travel Survey. Santos, A., McGuckin, N., Nakamoto, H. Y., Gray, D. and Liss, S., Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Yoh AC, Haas PJ, Taylor BD. 2003. Understanding transit ridership growth: Case studies of successful transit systems in the 1990s, Transport. Res. Record, 1835, 111–20.
   Google Scholar
• Yoh A, Iseki H, Smart M, Taylor BD. 2012. Hate to wait: the effects of wait time on public transit travelers perceptions, Transport. Res. Record, 2216, 116–124.
   Google Scholar
• Yoh A, Taylor BD, Gahbauer J. 2012. Does transit mean business? Reconciling academic, organizational, and political perspectives on reforming transit fare policies, University of California Transportation Center Research report number UCTC-FR-2012-13.
   Google Scholar