A multiple-discrete approach for examining vehicle type use for daily activity participation decisions

References

• Anowar S, Yasmin S, Eluru N and Miranda-Moreno L. 2012. Analyzing car ownership in Quebec city: a comparison of traditional and latent class ordered and unordered models. Technical paper, Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Arentze T and Timmermans H. 2008. Social Networks, social interactions, and activity–travel behaviour: a framework for microsimulation, Environ. Plann. B, 35, (6), 1012–1027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat CR. 2005. A multiple discrete-continuous extreme value model: formulation and application to discretionary time-use decisions, Transp. Res. Part B, 39, (8), 679–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat CR. 2008. The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model: role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions, Transp. Res. Part B, 42, (3), 274–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat CR and Eluru N. 2009. A copula-based approach to accommodate residential self-selection effects in travel behavior modeling, Transp. Res. Part B, 43, (7), 749–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat CR and Eluru N. 2010. Recent advances in discrete and discrete-continuous modeling systems, in Feasibility decisions in transportation engineering, (ed. Nocera S), 111–144, Milan, McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bhat CR and Misra R. 2002. Comprehensive activity–travel pattern modeling system for non-workers with empirical focus on the organization of activity episodes, Transp. Res. Rec., 1777, 16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bhat CR and Sen S. 2006. Household vehicle type holdings and usage: an application of the multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model, Transp. Res. Part B, 40, (1), 35–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat CR, Sen S and Eluru N. 2009. The impact of demographics, built environment attributes, vehicle characteristics, and gasoline prices on household vehicle holdings and use, Transp. Res. Part B, 43, (1), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat CR, Srinivasan S and Sen S. 2006. A joint model for the perfect and imperfect substitute goods case: application to activity time-use decisions, Transp. Res. Part B, 40, (10), 827–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownstone D and Golob TF. 2009. The impact of residential density on vehicle usage and energy consumption, J. Urban Econ., 65, (1), 91–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao X, Mokhtarian PL and Handy SL. 2006. Neighborhood design and vehicle type choice: evidence from Northern California, Transp. Res. Part D, 11, (2), 133–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasco JA and Miller EJ. 2009. The social dimension in action: a multilevel, personal networks model of social activity frequency between individuals, Transp. Res. Part A, 43, (1), 90–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro M, Eluru N, Bhat CR and Pendyala RM. 2011. Joint model of participation in nonwork activities and time-of-day choice set formation for workers, Transp. Res. Rec., 2254, 140–150.
   Google Scholar
• Eluru N, Bhat CR, Pendyala RM and Konduri KC. 2010a. A joint flexible econometric model system of household residential location and vehicle fleet composition/usage choices, Transportation, 37, (4), 603–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eluru N, Pinjari AR, Pendyala RM and Bhat CR. 2010b. An econometric multi-dimensional choice model of activity–travel behaviour, Transp. Lett., 2, (4), 217–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPA. 2009. U.S. greenhouse gas inventory report, US Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Ferdous N, Eluru N, Bhat CR and Meloni I. 2010. A multivariate ordered response model system for adults’ weekday activity episode generation by activity purpose and social context, Transp. Res. Part B, 44, (8–9), 922–943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gliebe JP and Koppelman FS. 2002. A model of joint activity participation between household members, Transportation, 29, 49–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golob TF. 1998. A model of household demand for activity participation and mobility, in Theoretical foundations of travel choice modeling, (eds. Garling T, Laitila T and Westin K), 365–398, Pergamon, UK, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Kapur A and Bhat CR. 2007. On modeling adults’ daily time use by activity purpose and accompaniment arrangement, Transp. Res. Rec., 2021, 18–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konduri KC, Ye X, Sana B and Pendyala RM. 2011. A joint tour-based model of vehicle type choice and tour length, Transp. Res. Rec., 2255, 28–37.
   Google Scholar
• Mannering F. 1983. An econometric analysis of vehicle use in multivehicle households, Transp. Res. Part A, 17, (3), 184–189.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadian A and Miller EJ. 2003. Empirical investigation of household vehicle type decisions, Transp. Res. Rec., 1854, 99–106.
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 2010. Advancing the science of climate change, Washington, DC, National Research Council, The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paleti R, Eluru N, Bhat CR, Pendyala RM, Adler TJ and Goulias KG. 2011. Design of comprehensive microsimulator of household vehicle fleet composition, utilization, and evolution, Transp. Res. Rec., 2254, 44–57.
   Google Scholar
• Paleti R, Pendyala RM, Bhat CR and Konduri KC. 2012. A joint tour-based model of tour complexity, passenger accompaniment, vehicle type choice, and tour length, Proc. 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Pinjari AR and Bhat CR. 2010. A multiple discrete-continuous nested extreme value (MDCNEV) model: formulation and application to non-worker activity time-use and timing behavior on weekdays, Transp. Res. Part B, 44, (4), 562–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinjari AR and Bhat CR. 2011. Computationally efficient forecasting procedures for Kuhn–Tucker consumer demand model systems: application to residential energy consumption analysis, Technical paper, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida.Please provide the location details for the reference “Pinjari and Bhat, 2011”.
   Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan BS, Pinjari AR and Bhat CR. 2009. Comprehensive model of worker non work-activity time use and timing behavior, Transp. Res. Rec., 2134, 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Santos A, McGuckin N, Nakamoto HY, Gray D and Liss S. (2011). Summary of Travel Trends: 2009 National Household Travel Survey (Report No. FHWA-PL-11-022). Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Scott DM and Kanaroglou PS. 2002. An activity-episode generation model that captures interactions between household heads: development and empirical analysis, Transp. Res. Part B, 36, 875–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sener IN, Bhat CR and Pendyala RM. 2011. When, where, how long, and with whom are individuals participating in physically active recreational episodes? Transp. Lett., 3, (3), 201–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spissu E, Pinjari AR, Bhat CR, Pendyala RM and Axhausen KW. 2009a. An analysis of weekly out-of-home discretionary activity participation and time-use behaviour, Transportation, 36, (5), 483–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spissu E, Pinjari AR, Pendyala RM and Bhat CR. 2009b. A copula-based joint multinomial discrete-continuous model of vehicle type choice and miles of travel, Transportation, 36, (4), 403–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S and Bhat CR. 2005. Modeling household interactions in daily in-home and out-of-home maintenance activity participation, Transportation, 32, (5), 523–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S and Bhat CR. 2008. An exploratory analysis of joint-activity participation characteristics using the American time use survey, Transportation, 35, (3), 301–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar