An investigation of household interactions in daily in-home and out-of-home maintenance activity participation and social behavior in Cairo, Egypt

References

• Arentze TA, Timmermans HJP. 2000. ALBATROSS – a learning-based transportation oriented simulation system, Eindhoven, European Institute of Retailing and Services Studies, 152–168.
   Google Scholar
• Arentze TA, Timmermans HJP. 2007. A dynamic model for generating multi-day, multi-person activity agendas: approach and illustration, 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Bhat CR. 1998. Accommodating variations in responsiveness to level-of-service variables in travel mode choice modeling, Transp. Res., 32, (7), 495–507.
   Google Scholar
• Bhat CR, Koppelman FS. 1999. A retrospective and prospective survey of time-use research, Transportation, 26, (2), 119–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat CR, Pendyala RM. 2005. Modeling intra-household interactions and group decision-making, Transportation, 32, 443–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgers A, Hofman F, Timmermans H. 2002. Conditional choice modelling of time allocation among spouses in transport settings, Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res., 2, (1), 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley M, Vovsha P. 2005. A model for joint choice of daily activity pattern types of household members, Transportation, 32, 545–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapin FS. 1974. Human activity patterns in the city: things people do in time and space, London, John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Daly A, Zachary S. 1978. Improved multiple choice models, in Identifying and measuring the determinants of mode choice, (eds. , Hensher D, Dalvi M), London, Teakfields, 335–357.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman O, Kern CR. 1997. A model of workplace and residence choice in two-worker households, Reg. Sci. Urban Econ., 27, 241–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried M, Havens J, Thall M. 1977. Travel behavior: a synthesis theory, Technical Report, The National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Golob TF, McNally MG. 1997. A model of activity participation and travel interactions between household heads, Transp. Res. Part B, 31, (3), 177–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulias KG. 2008. Companionship and altruism in daily activity time allocation and travel by men and women in the same households, CD-ROM, 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Hägerstrand T 1970. What about people in regional science? Papers of the Regional Science Association, 24, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher DA, Greene WH. 2003. The mixed logit model: the state of practice, Transportation, 30, 133–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher DA, Rose J, Greene WH. 2005. Applied choice analysis: a primer, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kang K, Scott DM. 2011. Impact of different criteria for identifying intra-household interactions: a case study of household time allocation, Transportation, 38, 81–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu X, Pas EI. 1999. Socio-demographics, activity participation and travel behavior, Transp. Res. Part A, 33, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma J, Goulias KG. 1997a. A dynamic analysis of activity and travel patterns using data from the Puget Sound transportation panel, Transportation, 24, (1), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ma J, Goulias KG. 1997b. An analysis of activity and travel patterns in the Puget Sound transportation panel, Chapter 10, in Activity-based approaches to travel analysis, (eds , Ettema F, Timmermans HJP), 189–207, The Netherlands, Pergamon Elsevier Science LTD.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden D. 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour, in Frontiers in econometrics, (ed. , Zarembka P), 105–142, New York, Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden D. 1978. Modelling the choice of residential location, in Spatial interaction theory and planning models, (eds. , Karlqvist A, Lundqvist L, Snickars F, Weibull J), 75–96, Amsterdam, North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Mok D. 2007. Do two-earner households base their choice of residential location on both incomes? Urban Stud., 44, (4), 723–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosa A, Harata N, Ohmori N. 2009. Simultaneous model for household interactions in daily activity, information and communication, and social behavior. Transportation Research Record Issue 2135, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, 138–150.
   Google Scholar
• Mosa A, Heikal AS, Abd El Maksoud AS. 2010a. On modeling heterogeneity in solo and joint “with whom” trip making. 12th World Conference of Transport Research WCTR, Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Mosa A, Ohmori N, Harata N. 2010b. Exploring the impacts of in-home virtual activities on daily activity and travel behavior: an analysis using Cairo activity and telecommunication diary data 2006, 12th World Conference of Transport Research WCTR, Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Pendyala RM, Kitamura R, Reddy DVGP. 1998. Application of an activity based travel demand model incorporating a rule-based algorithm, Environ. Plann. B, 25, 753–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pribyl O, Goulias KG. 2005. Simulation of daily activity patterns incorporating interactions within households. Transportation Research Record Issue 1926, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, 135–141.
   Google Scholar
• Recker WW. 1995. The household activity pattern problem: general formulation and solution, Transp. Res. Part B, 29, (1), 61–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanen T, Ettema D, Timmermans H. 2007. If you pick up the children, I’ll do the groceries: spatial differences in between-partner interactions in out-of-home household activities, Environ. Plann. A, 39, 2754–2773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott DM, Kanaroglou PS. 2002. An activity-episode generation model that captures interactions between household heads: development and empirical analysis, Transp. Res. Part B, 36, 875–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simma A, Axhausen KW. 2001. Within-household allocation of travel: case of upper Austria. Transportation Research Record Issue 1752, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, 69–75.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan KK, Athuru SR. 2004. Modeling the interaction between internet communication and travel activities – evidence from bay area travel survey 2000. Transportation Research Record, Issue 1894, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, 230–240.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S, Bhat CR. 2005. Modeling household interactions in daily in-home and out-of-home maintenance activity participation, Transportation, 32, 523–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S, Bhat CR. 2006. A multiple discrete-continuous model for independent- and joint discretionary activity participation decisions, Transportation, 33, 497–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S, Bhat CR. 2008. An exploratory analysis of joint-activity participation characteristics using the American time use survey, Transportation, 35, 301–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S, Ferreira J. 2002. Travel behavior at the household level: understanding linkages with residential choice, Transp. Res. Part D, 7, 225–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vovsha P, Peterson E, Donnelly R. 2004. Model for allocation of maintenance activities to household members. Transportation Research Record, Issue 1894, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, 170–179.
   Google Scholar
• Wen C, Koppelman FS. 2000. A conceptual and methodological framework for the generation of activity-travel patterns. Transportation, 27, 5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen CH, Koppelman FS. 1999. Integrated model system of stop generation and tour formation for the analysis of activity and travel patterns. Transportation Research Record Issue 1676, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, 136–144.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Fujiwara A. 2006. Representing household time allocation behavior by endogenously incorporating diverse intra-household interactions: a case study in the context of elderly couples, Transp. Res. Part B, 40, 54–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Timmermans H, Borgers A. 2004. Model structure kernel for household task allocation incorporating household interaction and inter-activity dependency, Transportation Research Board 83rd Annual Meeting Pre-Print CD ROM, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar