Measuring value of travel time and travel time variability in the presence of managed lanes: results from a pilot stated preference survey on the Capital Beltway

References

• Daly AJ, Hess S and Train KE. 2012. Assuring finite moments for willingness to pay in random coefficients models, Transportation, 39, (1), 19–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellana J, Daly AJ, Hess S, Ortúzar JD and Rizzi LI. 2012. Developing surveys for the study of departure time choice: a two-stage efficient design approach, Transp. Res. Rec. 2303, 9–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnott R, de Palma A and Lindsey R. 1998. ”Recent developments in the bottleneck model„, in Road pricing, traffic congestion and the environment: issues of efficiency and social feasibility, (eds. Button Kenneth J, Verhoef Erik T), 79–110.
   Google Scholar
• Asensio J and Matas A. 2008. Commuters’ valuation of travel time variability, Transp. Res. Part E, 44, (6), 1074–1085.
   Google Scholar
• Bastin F, Cirillo C and Toint Ph.L. 2010. Estimating non-parametric random utility models, with an application to the value of time in heterogeneous populations, Transp. Sci., 44, (4), 537–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates J, Polak J, Jones P and Cook A. 2001. The valuation of reliability for personal travel, Transp. Res. Part E, 37, (2–3), 191–229.
   Google Scholar
• Börjesson M and Algers S. 2011. Properties of internet and telephone data collection methods in a stated choice value of time study context, J. Choice Modell., 4, (2), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Börjesson M. 2008. Joint RP/SP data in a mixed logit analysis of trip timing decisions, Transp. Res. Part E, 44, (6), 1025–1038.
   Google Scholar
• Börjesson M, Eliasson J, Hugosson M and Brundell-Freij K. 2012. The Stockholm congestion charges – five years on. Effects, acceptability and lessons learned, Transp. Policy, 20, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calfee J and Winston C. 1998. The value of automobile travel time: implications for congestion policy, J. Pub. Econ., 69, (1), 83–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkleman J, Casello J and Fu L. 2011. Empirical evidence from the Greater Toronto Area on the acceptability and impacts of HOT lanes, Transp. Policy, 18, (6), 814–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman L, Jurasin R, Larwin T, Orski C, Turnbull K and Cunard R. 1998. High-occupancy/toll (HOT) lanes and value pricing: a preliminary assessment, ITE J., 68, (6), 30–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorson R, Nookala M and Buckeye K. 2006. High occupancy toll lane innovations: I-394 MnPASS, The 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA, Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher D and Greene W. 2003. The mixed logit model: the state of practice, Transportation, 30, (2), 133–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess S., Polak J., Daly A.J. and Hyman G. 2007 Flexible substitution patterns in models of mode and time of day choice: new evidence from the UK and the Netherlands, Transportation, 34, 213–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander Y. 2006. Direct versus indirect models for the effects of unreliability, Transp. Res. Part A, 40, (9), 699–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson W and Jucker J. 1982. An empirical study of travel time variability and travel choice behavior, Transp. Sci., 16, (4), 460–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight FH. 1924. Some fallacies in the interpretation of social cost, Q. J. Econ., 38, 582–606.
   Google Scholar
• Li Z, Hensher D and Rose J. 2010. Willingness to pay for travel time reliability in passenger transport: a review and some new empirical evidence, Transp. Res. Part E, 46, (3), 384–403.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey R. 2006. Do economists reach a conclusion on road pricing? the intellectual history of an idea, Econ. J. Watch, 3, (2), 292–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. (15th January, 2010). Hot lanes in the U.S. Available: http://www.metro.net/projects/expresslanes/expresslanes_us/ (Last accessed on Metro 15th December, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Maryland Department of Transportation. 2010. Toll rates set for the first segment of the ICC. Available: http://www.mdot.maryland.gov/News/2010/June2010/ICCtollrates-segment1.html
   Google Scholar
• McFadden D and Train K. 2000. Mixed MNL models for discrete response, J. Appl. Economet., 15, 447–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noland R, and Polak J. 2002. Travel time variability: a review of theoretical and empirical issues, Transp. Rev., 22, 39–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigou AC. 1920. The economics of welfare, London, Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Revelt D and Train KE. 2000. Customer-specific taste parameters and mixed logit, Working Paper E00-274, Berkeley, CA, USA, Department of Economics, University of California at Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Senna L. 1994. The influence of travel time variability on the value of time, Transportation, 21, 203–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibdari S and Jeihani M. 2009. On the impact of HOT Lane tolling strategies on total traffic level, J. Transp. Res. Forum, 48, (3), 119–130.
   Google Scholar
• Sillano M. and de Ortúzar J.D. 2005 Willingness-to-pay estimation with mixed logit models: some new evidence, Environ. Plann., 37A, 525–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Train K. 2009. Discrete choice methods with simulation, New York, NY, USA, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Viti F, Catalano S, Li M, Lindveld C and Zuylen H. 2003. An optimization problem with dynamic route-departure time choice and pricing, 82 Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board CD-ROM, Washington, DC,USA, Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Vrtic M, Schuessle N and Erath A. 2009. The impacts of road pricing on route and mode choice behaviour, J. Choice Modell., 3, 109–126.
   Google Scholar