An activity-based freight mode choice microsimulation model

References

• Andreoli D, Goodchild A and Jessup E. 2012. Estimating truck trips with product specific data: a disruption case study in Washington potatoes, Transport. Lett., 4, (3), 153–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerkamps JHK, van Binsbergen AJ and Bovy PHL. 2000. Modeling behavioral aspects of urban freight movement in supply chains, Transport. Res. Rec., 1725, 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2010. Revised 2002 benchmark input-output make and use tables. Available: http://www.bea.gov/industry/io_benchmark.htm (Accessed July, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge Systematics Inc, Global Insight X, Cohen H, Horowitz A and Pendyala R. 2008. NCHRP report 606: forecasting statewide freight toolkit, Washington, DC, TRB, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Chow JY, Yang CH and Regan AC. 2010. State-of-the art of freight forecast modeling: lessons learned and the road ahead, Transportation, 37, (6), 1011–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong G and Ben-Akiva M. 2007. A micro-simulation model of shipment size and transport chain choice, Transport. Res. Part B, 41, 950–965.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly R. 2007. A hybrid microsimulation model of freight flows, Proc. 4th International Conf. on ‘City Logistics’, 11–13 July, 2007, (eds. Taniguchi E and Thompson R G), 235–246, Crete, Greece, Institute for City Logistics.
   Google Scholar
• Ettema DF and Timmermans HJP. 1997. activity based approaches to travel analysis, Tarrytown, NY, Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration. 2010. The freight analysis framework, version 3: overview of FAF3 national freight flow tables.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration. 2007. Quick response freight manual I and II, Freight management and operations, Figliozzi, MA, US Department of Transportation, FHWA-HOP-08-010.
   Google Scholar
• Global Insight, Inc. 2007. Methodology for the freight analysis framework-2: forecasts of inter-regional commodity flows, Washington, DC, Battelle Memorial Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Greene HW. 2002. LIMDEP version 8.0 user’s manual, Plainview, NY, USA, Econometric Software, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hall RW. 1985. Dependence between shipment size and mode in freight transportation, Transport. Sci., 19, (4), 436–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher D and Figliozzi M. 2007. Behavioural insights into the modelling of freight transportation and distribution systems, Transport. Res. Part B, 41, 921–923.
   Google Scholar
• Holguín-Veras J and Thorson E. 2003. Modeling commercial vehicle empty trips with a first order trip chain model, Transport. Res. Part B, 37, (2), 129–148.
   Google Scholar
• Hummels D. 2007. Transportation costs and international trade in the second era of globalization, J. Econ. Perspect., 21, (3), 131–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt JD, Donnelly R, Abraham JE, Batten C, Freedman J, Hicks J, Costinett PJ and Upton WJ. 2001. Design of a statewide land use transport interaction model for Oregon, Proceedings of World Conference on Transportation Research, Seoul, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt JD, Stefan KJ and Brownlee AT. 2006. Establishment-based survey of urban commercial vehicle movements in Alberta, Canada: survey design, implementation, and results, Transport. Res. Rec., 1957, 75–83.
   Google Scholar
• Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ and Neter J. 2004. Applied linear regression models, 4th edn, New York, McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Liedtke G. 2009. Principles of micro-behavior commodity transport modeling, Transport. Res. E Logist. Transport. Rev., 45, (5), 795–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liedtke G and Schepperle H. 2004. Segmentation of the transportation market with regard to activity-based freight transport modelling, Int. J. Logist., 7, (3), 199–218.
   Google Scholar
• McNally MG and Recker WW. 1986. On the formation of household travel/activity pattern: a simulation approach, Final Report to USDoT, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Newey WK and McFadden D. 1994. Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing, in Handbook of econometrics, (eds. Engle R and McFadden D), Vol. 4, 2111–2245, Amsterdam, North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Oak Ridge National Laboratory. 2006. CTA transportation networks. Available: http://www-cta.ornl.gov/transnet/ (Accessed July, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Pendyala RM, Shankar VN and McCullough RG. 2000. Freight travel demand modeling: synthesis of approaches and development of a framework, Transportation research record 1725, 9–16, Washington, DC, TRB, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Roorda MJ, Cavalcante R, McCabe S and Kwan H. 2010. A conceptual framework for agent-based modelling of logistics services, Transport. Res. E Logist. Transport. Rev., 46, (1), 18–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samimi A. 2010. A behavioral mode choice microsimulation model for freight transportation in the US, PhD dissertation, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Samimi A, Mohammadian A and Kawamura K. 2010. A behavioral freight movement microsimulation model: method and data, Transport. Lett., 2, (1), 53–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samimi A, Mohammadian A and Kawamura K. 2013. A nationwide web-based freight data collection, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 40, (2), 114–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samimi A, Kawamura K and Mohammadian A. 2011. A behavioral analysis of freight mode choice decisions, Transport. Plann. Technol., 34, (8), 857–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southworth F. 2003. Freight transportation planning: models and methods, in Transportation systems planning: methods and applications, (ed. Goulias K G), 10–30, Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stefan KJ, McMillan JDP and Hunt JD. 2005. An urban commercial vehicle movement model for Calgary, Transport. Res. Rec., 1921, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Tavasszy LA, Smeenk B and Ruijgrok CJ. 1998. A DSS for modelling logistic chains in freight transport policy analysis, Int. Trans. Oper. Res., 5, (6), 447–459.
   Google Scholar
• Train EK. 2003. Discrete choice methods with simulation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Transportation Research Board. 2008. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Report 606. Forecasting statewide freight toolkit, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• US Census Bureau. 2011. Economic planning and coordination division, County Business Patterns. Available: http://www.census.gov/econ/cbp/download/index.htm (Accessed February, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• United States Government Accountability Office. 2007. Freight transportation national policy and strategies can help improve freight mobility. Publication GAO, GAO-08-287.
   Google Scholar
• US House of Representatives. 2009. The Surface Transportation Authorization Act of 2009, A blue print for investment and reform, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Available: http://t4america.org/docs/061809_STAA_summary.pdf,last (Accessed 29 July, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Wisetjindawat W, Matsumoto S and Sano K. 2005. Supply chain simulation for modeling the interactions in freight movement, J. East. Asia Soc. Transport. Stud., 6, 2991–3004.
   Google Scholar
• Wisetjindawat W and Sano K. 2003. A behavioral modeling in micro-simulation for urban freight transportation, J. East. Asia Soc. Transport. Stud., 5, 2193–2208.
   Google Scholar
• Wisetjindawat W, Sano K, Matsumoto S and Raothanachonkun P. 2007. Microsimulation model for modeling freight agents interactions in urban freight movement, Proceedings of 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, 21–25 January, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Yang CH, Chow JYJ and Regan AC. 2009. State-of-the art of freight forecasting modeling: lessons learned and the road ahead, Proceedings, 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, 11–15 January, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou J and Dai S. 2012. Urban and metropolitan freight transportation: a quick review of existing models, Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 12, (4), 106–114.
   Google Scholar