The equilibrium location of industrial manufacturing and laborers working in the pan-Pearl River Delta of China

References

• Aarhus K. 2000. Office location decisions, modal split and the environment: the ineffectiveness of Norwegian land use policy, Journal of Transport Geography 8, 287–294.
   Google Scholar
• Bass B, McGragor D and Walters J. 1977. Selecting foreign plant sites: economic, social and political considerations, Acad. Manage. J., 20, (4), 34–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierlaire M. 2003. BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models, Proc. 3rd Swiss Transportation Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Bierlaire M. 2008. An introduction to BIOGEME Version 1.6, biogeme.epfl.ch.
   Google Scholar
• Clay MJ and Johnston RA. 2006. Multivariate uncertainty analysis of an integrated land use and transportation model: MEPLAN, Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., 11, (3), 191–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echenique MH, Flowerdew ADJ, Hunt JD, Mayo TR, Skidmore IJ and Simmonds DC. 1990. The MEPLAN models of Bilbao, Leeds and Dortmund, Transp. Rev., 10, (4), 309–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo O, Guimaraes P and Woodward D. 2002. Home-field advantage: location decisions of Portuguese entrepreneurs, J. Urban Econ., 52, 341–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holl A. 2004. Manufacturing location and impacts of road transport infrastructure: empirical evidence from Spain, Reg. Sci. Urban Econ., 34, 341–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry IS. 1964. A model of location RM-4035-RC, Santa Monica, CA, Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Leitharm S, McQuaid RW and Nelson JD 2000. The influence of transport on industrial location choice: a stated preference experiment, Transportation Research Part A 34, 515–535.
   Google Scholar
• Luce RD and Suppes P. 1965. Preference, utility, and subjective probability, handbook of mathematical psychology, 249–410. New York, Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mackett RL. 1993. Structure of linkages between transport and land use, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 27, (3), 189–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings E and Sleuwaegen L. 2000. International relocation: firm and industry determinants, Econ. Lett, 67, 179–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravulaparthy S and Goulias KG. 2011. Forecasting with dynamic microsimulation: design, implementation, and demonstration, UCTC Project 2009–2010.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond J and Mataloni J. 2011. The structure of location choice for new U.S. manufacturing investments in Asia-Pacific, J. World Bus., 46, 154–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodney AE and Michael W. 1980. Firm relocation and site selection in suburban municipalities, J. Urban Econ., 8, 69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfield A, Chingcuanco F and Miller EJ. 2013. Agent-based housing market microsimulation for integrated land use, transportation, environment model system, Procedia Comput. Sci., 19, 841–846.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw SL and Xin X. 2003. Integrated land use and transportation interaction: a temporal GIS exploratory data analysis approach, J. Transp. Geogr., 11, (2), 103–115.
   Google Scholar
• Sridhar KS and Wan GH. 2010. Firm location choice in cities: evidence from China, India, and Brazil, China Econ. Rev., 21, 113–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans H. 2003. The saga of integrated land use-transport modeling: how many more dreams before we wake up? The 10th Int. Conf. on Travel Behaviour Research, Lucerne.
   Google Scholar
• Vernon R. 1971. Sovereignty at bay: the multinational spread of U.S. Firms, New York, Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Waddell P and Ulfarsson G. 2004. Introduction to urban simulation: design and development of operational models, in Handbook of transport geography and spatial systems, (eds. Hensher D A, Button K J, Haynes K E, and Stopher P R), 203–236, London, Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Waddell P. 2002. UrbanSim: modeling urban development for land use, transportation, and environmental planning, J. Am. Plann. Assoc., 68, (3), 297–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener M. 2004. Overview of land-use transport models, in Handbook of transport geography and spatial systems, (eds. Hensher D A, Button K J, Haynes K E, and Stopher P R), 127–146, London, Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Yang YZ, Yang ZZ, Yang Z and Zuo Z. 2005. Evaluation of competition ability and market share for container port, Proc. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud., 5, 2483–2493.
   Google Scholar