Pedestrians’ mental satisfaction's relationship with physical characteristics on sidewalks using analytical hierarchy process: case study of Tehran, Iran

References

• Aeashthi A and Chauhan S. 2011. Using AHP and Dempster-Shafer theory for evaluating sustainable transport solutions, Environ. Model. Software, 26, (6), 787–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andijani AA. 1996. A multi-criterion approach to Kanban allocations, Omega, 26, (4), 483–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson N and Mololurin A. 1997. An action learning evaluation procedure for multiple criterion decision making problem, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 26, (6), 637–643.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell BJ, Zegeer CV, Huang HH, Cynecki MJ. 2004. A review of pedestrian safety research in the united states and abroad, Publication FHWA-RD-03-042, Chapel Hill, US Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Carsten OMJ, Sherborne DJ and Rothengatter JA. 1998. Intelligent traffic signals for pedestrians: evaluation of trials in three countries, Transp. Res. Part C, 6, (4), 213–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho G, Rodríguez DA, Khattak AJ. 2009. What is the role of the built environment in explaining relationships between perceived and actual pedestrian safety? TRB (Transportation Research Board), The 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, USA, 11–15 January 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton K and Kreamer-Fults K. 2007. An examination of the environmental attributes associated with pedestrian-vehicular crashes near public schools, Accid. Anal. Prev., 39, (4), 708–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster SA, Giles-Corti B and Knuiman MW. 2011. Creating safe walkable streetscapes: does house design and upkeep discourage incivilities in suburban neighbourhoods? J. Environ. Psychol., 31, (1), 79–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friman M, Edvardsson B and Gärling T. 2001. Frequency of negative critical incidents and satisfaction with public transport services, J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 8, (2), 95–114.
   Google Scholar
• Hine J. 1996. Pedestrian travel experiences: assessing the impact of traffic on behavior and perceptions of safety using an in-depth interview technique, J. Transp. Geogr., 4, (3), 179–199.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Transportation Engineers. 1998. Design and safety of pedestrian facilities, a recommended practice of the Institute of Transportation Engineer, Traffic Engineering Council Committee TENC-5A-Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Jaśkiewicz M and Besta T. 2013. Is easy access related to better life? Walkability and overlapping of personal and communal identity as predictors of quality of life, J. Appl. Res. Qual. Life, 9, 505–516, doi: 10·1007/s11482-013-9246-6.
   Google Scholar
• Keegan O and O'Mahony M. 2003. Modifying pedestrian behavior, Transp. Res. A Policy Pract., 37, (10), 889–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili M, Latifi Oskouyi L, Mohammadi M, Khaksaz H. 2011. Assessment of factors affecting the desirability of walking paths, comparative surveying of trabiat walkway in Tabriz and Sepah Salar Walkway (Saf) in Tehran, in ICTTE(International Conference of Traffic and Transportation), 10th International Conference of Traffic and Transportation, Tehran, Iran, 21–22 February 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kim K, Brunner IM and Yamashita E. 2008. Modeling violation of Hawaii's crosswalk law, Accid. Anal. Prev., 40, (3), 894–904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim K and Yamashita E. 2011. Urban environmental quality and pedestrian volumes, J. Transp. Res. Board, 11–3780, 18.
   Google Scholar
• King M, Soole D and Ghafourian A. 2009. Illegal pedestrian crossing at signalized intersections: incidence and relative risk, Accid. Anal. Prev., 41, (3), 485–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie E and Cerin E. 2008. Are perceptions of the local environment related to neighbourhood satisfaction and mental health in adults? J. Prev. Med., 47, (3), 273–278.
   Google Scholar
• Leyden KM. 2003. Social capital and the built environment: the importance of walkable neighborhoods, Am. J. Public Health, 93, (9), 1546–1551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyden KM, Goldberg A and Michelbach P. 2011. Understanding the pursuit of happiness in ten major cities, Urban Affairs Rev., 47, (6), 861–888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loukaitou-Sideris A, Blumenberg E and Ehrenfeucht R. 2004. Sidewalk democracy: municipalities and the regulation of public space, in Regulating place: standards and the shaping of Urban America, (eds. Ben-Joseph E and Szold T S), New York, Routledge , pp. 141–166.
   Google Scholar
• Lund H. 2002. Pedestrian environments and sense of community, J. Plann. Educ. Res., 21, (3), 301–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Management and Planning Organization Office of the Deputy for Technical Affairs. 1997. Iran's sidewalk facility Code No. 144, Management and Planning Organization Office Publication, Tehran.
   Google Scholar
• Miranda-Moreno LF and Fernandes D. 2011. Pedestrian activity modelling at signalized intersections: land use, urban form, weather and spatio-temporal patterns, in TRB(Transportation Research Board), The 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washignton DC, USA, 23–27 January 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mirzanamadi R and Afsharikia Z. 2012. Exploring factors that influence people's satisfaction with sidewalk environments using multi-criteria methods (SAW, TOPSIS, VIKOR & AHP), J. Traffic Eng., 49, (2), 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Naghavi R, and Nadernejad M. 2012. Technical measures of Creation Mode of Green Space in Urban Passages, the 9th ‘International Congress on Civil Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran, 8–10 May 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Nursyamsu H, Choocharukul K and Kishi K., 2011. Understanding pedestrian perceptions on sidewalk performance: a comparative study between Bangkok and Jakarta, in TRB(Transportation Research Board), The 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washignton DC, USA, 23–27 January 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pamanikabud P and Pichittanapanya S. 2003. Serviceability analysis of pedestrian walkway at Bangkok mass transit station, J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud., 5, (1), 2382–2397.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson K. 1896. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution III. regression, heredity and panmixia, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond Ser. A, 187, 253–318.
   Google Scholar
• Piantanakulchai M and Saengkhao N. 2003. Evaluation of alternatives in transportation planning using multi-stakeholders multi-objectives AHP, East. Asia Soc. Transp. Study, 4, (1), 1613–1628.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers SH, Halstead JM, Gardner KH and Carlson CH. 2011. Examining walkability and social capital as indicators of quality of life at the municipal and neighborhood scales, Appl. Res. Qual. Life, 6, (2), 201–213.
   Google Scholar
• Sacco VF. 1993. Social support and the fear of crime, Can. J. Criminol., 35, 187–196.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar S. 2003. Qualitative evaluation of comfort needs in urban walkways in major activity centers, in TRB(Transportation Research Board), The 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washignton DC, USA, 12–16 January, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder HW and Cannon WN. 1987. Visual quality of residential streets: both street and yard trees make a difference, J. Arboric., 13, (10), 236–239.
   Google Scholar
• Shafabakhsh GH, Mirzanamadi R and Mohammadi M. 2013. Micro simulation of the elderly population's effect on Iran's pedestrian's walking flow, J. Promet-Traffic Transp., 25, (4), 331–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafabakhsh GH and Mohammadi M. 2013. Simulation of pedestrian movements using social force model, J. Model. Eng., 11, (34), 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Stradling SG, Anable J and Carreno M. 2007. Performance, importance and user disgruntlement: a six-step method for measuring satisfaction with travel modes, Transp. Res. Part A, 41, (1), 98–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaboriboon Y and Jing Q. 1994. Chinese pedestrians and their walking characteristics: case study in Beijing, Transp. Res. Rec., 1441, 16–26.
   Google Scholar
• Transportation Research Board. 2000. Highway capacity manual 2000, Washington, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Valipur JS and Ahmadzade N. 2006. Pedestrians' roles on improvement of urban transportation, National Congress of Improvement of Urban Environment, Tehran, Iran, 15–16 August 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Wang W, Ren G and Namgung M. 2011. Exploring factors that influence people's satisfaction with sidewalk environments, The 92th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, USA, 23–27 January, 2011, 11–0580.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2007. Strategic Urban Transport Policy Directions for Bangkok, Bangkok, Transport Development Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Yuen B and Chor CH. 1998. Pedestrian streets in Singapore, Transp. J., 25, (3), 225–242.
   Google Scholar
• Zegeer C, Seidderman C, Lagerwey P, Cynecki M., Ronklin M and Schneider R 1982. Pedestrian facilities users guide, Publication FHWA-RD-01-102, Chapel Hill, US Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar