Transit signal priority control at signalized intersections: a comprehensive review

References

• Abdy ZR and Hellinga BR. 2011. Analytical method for evaluating the impact of transit signal priority on vehicle delay, J. Transp. Eng., 137, (8), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Abkowitz M 1978. Transit service reliability, Report No. UMTA-MA-06-0049-78-1, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., December.
   Google Scholar
• Allsop RE. 1977. Priority for buses at signal-controlled junctions: some implications for signal timings, in Transportation and Traffic Theory, Proc 7th International Symposium on ‘Transportation and Traffic Theory’, August 1977, Kyoto, (eds. Sasaki T and Yamaoka T), 247–270, Kyoto, The Institute of Systems Science Research.
   Google Scholar
• Altun SZ and Furth PG. 2009. Scheduling buses to take advantage of transit signal priority, Transp. Res. Rec., 2111, 50–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balke KN, Dudek CL and Urbanik T II. 2000. Development and evaluation of an intelligent bus priority concept. Presented at the 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, No.1727, Washington, DC, 12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen GT, Bretherton RD, Landles JR and Cook DJ. 1994. Active bus priority in SCOOT, Seventh International Conference on Road Traffic Monitoring and Control, London, pp.73–76.
   Google Scholar
• Bi Z, Hang F and Zhang R. 2011. Applications of transit signal priority control for Changzhou BRT system, People Public Transp., 5, 52–54. [毕志袖, 杭福兵, 张锐. 信号优先技术在常州快速公交系统的运用. 人民公交, 2011 (5): 52–54. In Chinese].
   Google Scholar
• Chang GL, Vasudevan M and Su CC. 1996. Modeling and evaluation of adaptive bus-preemption control with and without automatic vehicle location system, Transp. Res. A, 30, (4), 251–268.
   Google Scholar
• Chang J, Collura J, Dion F and Rakha H. 2003. Evaluation of service reliability impacts of traffic signal priority strategies for bus transit, Transp. Res. Rec., 1841, 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper BR, Vincent RA and Wood K. 1980. Bus-actuated traffic signals-initial assessment of part of the Swansea bus priority scheme, Department of Transport TRRI, Report LR 925.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper BR, Vincent RA and Wood K. 1980. Bus-actuated traffic signals-initial assessment of part of the Swansea bus priority scheme. Department of Transport TRRI. Report LR 925, Crowthorne.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwell PR. 1986. Dynamic signal coordination and public transport priority, Road Traffic Monitoring and Control, London, United Kingdom, pp. 158–161.
   Google Scholar
• Cottinet M, Breteque A, Henry JJ and Gabard F. 1980. Assessment by observation and by simulation studies of the interest of different methods of bus preemption at traffic lights. Proc. Int. Symp.on Traffic Systems, Berkeley, CA , Vol.2, pp. 92–105.
   Google Scholar
• D'Souza C, Gardner K, Hounsell NB and Shrestha BP. 2010. New developments for bus priority at traffic signals in London using iBus, Road Transport Information and Control Conference and the ITS United Kingdom Members' Conference (RTIC 2010) – Better transport through technology, London, IET.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Transport, London. 1977. Bus priority at traffic signals using selective detection. Technical Memorundum H2/77. HMSO, London.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Transport, London. 1980. Bus selective detection in Swansea. Traffic Advisory Unit Report. Department of Transport, London.
   Google Scholar
• Dion F and Hesham R. 2005. Integration transit signal priority with adaptive traffic signal control systems, presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Elias WJ. 1976. The greenback experiment: signal preemption for express buses: a demonstration project. Caltrans, Sacramento County, California, April.
   Google Scholar
• El-Reedy TY and Ashworth R. 1978. The effect of bus detection on the performance of a traffic signal controlled intersection, Transp. Res., 12, (5), 337–342.
   Google Scholar
• Evans H and Skiles G. 1970. Improving public transit through bus preemption of traffic signals, Traffic Q., 24, (4), 531–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Pei Y and Cao C. 2007. Study of single bus priority signal planning under the mixed traffic flow, J. Harbin Inst. Technol., 39, (2), 296–298. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Gallivan S, Young CP and Peirce JR. 1980. Bus priority in a network of traffic signals. The ATEC Conference, Paris, Crowthorne: Transport and Road Research Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner K, D'Souza C, Hounsell NP, Shrestha BP and Bretherton D. 2009. UITP WORKING GROUP: interaction of buses and signals at road crossings, Final Report V2·0, April.
   Google Scholar
• Garrow M and Machemehl R. 1998. Development and evaluation of transit signal priority strategies, Presented at the 77th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• He Q, Head KL and Ding J. 2011. Heuristic Algorithm for Priority Traffic Signal Control, Transp Res. Rec., 2259, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head L, Gettman D and Wei Z. 2006. Decision model for priority control of traffic signals, Transp Res. Rec, 1978, 169–177.
   Google Scholar
• Hounsell NB, McLeod FN, Bretherton RD and Bowen GT. 1996. PROMPT: field trial and simulation results of bus priority in SCOOT, 8th International Conference on Road Traffic Monitoring and Control, London, pp. 90–94, April.
   Google Scholar
• Hounsell NB, McLeod FN, Gardner K, Head JR and Cook D. 2000. Headway-based bus priority in London using AVL: first results, Tenth International Conference of Road Transport Information and Control, London, pp. 218–222.
   Google Scholar
• Hounsell NB and Shrestha BP. 2012. A New approach for co-operative bus priority at traffic signals, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 13, (1), 6–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hounsell NB, Shrestha BP, Head JR, Palmer S and Bowen T. 2008. The way ahead for London's bus priority at traffic signals, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2, (3), 193–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hounsell NB and Wu JP. 1995. Public transport priority in real-time traffic control systems, Appl. Adv. Technol. Transp. Eng., pp. 71–75, June.
   Google Scholar
• Iwaoka K, Maruyama M and Niikura S. 2000. Public transportation priority systems combined with multiple traffic control strategies, Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, Dearborn, USA, October 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson J and Sheffi Y. 1981. Analytical model of traffic delays under bus signal preemption: theory and application, Transp. Res. B, 15, (2), 127–138.
   Google Scholar
• Janos M and Furth PG. 2002. Bus priority with highly interruptible traffic signals: simulation of San Juan's Avenida Ponce de Leon, Transp. Res. Rec., 1811, 157–165.
   Google Scholar
• Ji Y, Deng W, Wang W, and Zhang W. 2005. Study on the design of signal phase based on bus priority intersections, J. Highw. Transp. Res. Dev., 21, (12), 118–122.. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Khasnabis S, Reddy GV and Chaudry BB. 1991. Signal preemption as a priority treatment tool for transit demand management, Vehicle Navigation Information Systems Conference, Volume 2, pp. 1093–1104.
   Google Scholar
• Kimpel TJ, Strathman J, Bertini RL and Callas S. 2005. Analysis of transit signal priority using archived trimet bus dispatch system data, Transp. Res. Rec., 1925, 156–166.
   Google Scholar
• Kulash D. 1971. Routing and scheduling in public transit systems, dissertation presented to Massachusetts Institute of Technology, at Cambridge, Mass., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
   Google Scholar
• Li M, Yang Y, Zhang W and Zhou K. 2011. Modeling and implementation of adaptive transit signal priority on actuated control systems, Comput Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 26, 270–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang Y. 2011. Bus signal priority – a useful technology for Beijing public transportation development, J. Highw. Transp. Res. Dev., 28, (7), 26–30. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Liao CF and Davis GA. 2007. Simulation study of a bus signal priority strategy based on GPS/AVL and wireless communications, Transp. Res. Rec., 2034, 82–91.
   Google Scholar
• Lin W. 2002. Quantifying delay reduction to buses with signal priority treatment in mixed-mode operation, Transp. Res. Rec., 1811, 100–106.
   Google Scholar
• Lin YJ, Yang XF, Chang G.-L and Zou N. 2013b. Transit priority strategies for multiple routes under headway-based operations, Transp. Res. Rec., 2356, 34–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin YJ, Yang XF, Zou N and Jia L. 2013a. A new passive transit signal priority control at urban arterials, J. Northeast. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 34, (9), 1134–1140. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Lin YJ, Yang XF, Zou N and Jia L. 2013c. Real time bus arrival prediction: a case study of Jinan China, J. Transp. Eng. ASCE, 139, (11), 1134–1140.
   Google Scholar
• Ling K and Shalaby A. 2004. Automated transit headway control via adaptive signal priority, J. Adv. Transp., 38, (1), 45–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Skabardonis A and Zhang W. 2003. A dynamic model for adaptive bus signal priority. Preprint CD-ROM, 82nd Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Liu H, Zhang J and Cheng D. 2008. Analysis approach to evaluating transit signal priority, J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inform. Technol., 8, (2), 48–57.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwick JC Jr. 1974. Simulation of an unconditional preemption bus priority system. Report MTP-400, Yhe Mitre Corporation, Washington, DC, December.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwick JS Jr. 1976. Bus priority systems: simulation and analysis. Report No. UMTA-VA-06-0026-76-1, Washington, DC, February.
   Google Scholar
• Ma W and Yang X. 2007. A passive transit signal priority approach for bus rapid transit system, ITSC 2007, Seattle: IEEE, pp. 413–418.
   Google Scholar
• Ma W and Yu B. 2007. Serve sequence optimization approach for multiple bus priority requests based on decision tree, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of Chinese Transportation Professionals Congress. Shanghai, China.
   Google Scholar
• Ma W, Yang X and Liu Y. 2010. Development and evaluation of a coordinated and conditional bus priority approach, Transp. Res. Rec., 2145, 49–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGowan J and Fullerton IJ. 1979. Development and testing of advanced control strategies in the urban traffic control system, Public Roads, 43, (3), 97–105.
   Google Scholar
• Machemehl R. Class Notes: CE 391 L, Advanced Traffic Engineering, the University of Texas at Austin, Spring, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod F and Hounsell N. 2003. Bus priority at traffic signals – evaluating strategy options, J. Public Transp., 6, (3), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Mirchandani PB, Knyazyan A, Head L and Wu W 2001. An approach towards the integration of bus priority, traffic adaptive signal control, and bus information/scheduling systems, in Computer-aided scheduling of public transport, 319–334, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Muthuswamy S, McShane WR and Daniel JR. 2007. Evaluation of transit signal priority and optimal signal timing plans in transit and traffic operations, Transp. Res. Rec., 2034, 92–102.
   Google Scholar
• Ngan V, Sayed T and Abdelfatah A. 2004. Impacts of various parameters on transit signal priority effectiveness, J. Public Transp., 7, 3.
   Google Scholar
• PRISCILLA. 2002a. (2002) Public transport priority: state of the art review, bus priority strategies and impact scenarios development on a large urban area – Deliverable 2, February
   Google Scholar
• Qian X, Liu Z and Jin X. 2007. Design and applications of transit signal priority control system for BRT Route No.1 in Hangzhou, Urban Public Transp., 2, 17–18. [钱小鸿, 柳展, 金向东. 杭州快速公交一号线交通信号优先系统的设计与应用. 城市公共交通, 2007 (2): 17–18. In Chinese].
   Google Scholar
• Rakha H and Zhang Y. 2004. Sensitivity analysis of transit signal priority impacts on operation of a signalized intersection, J. Transp. Eng., 130, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Salter R and Shahi J. 1979. Prediction of effects of bus-priority schemes by using computer simulation techniques, Transp. Res. Rec., 718, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Satiennam T, Muroi T, Fukuda A and Jansuwan S. 2005. An enhanced public transportation priority system for two-lane arterials with nearside bus stops, Proc. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud., 5, 1309–1321.
   Google Scholar
• Seward SR and Taube RN. 1977. Methodology for evaluating bus-actuated, signal-preemption system, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, pp.11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Skabardonis A. 2000. Control strategies for transit priority, Transp. Res. Rec., 1727, 20–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith HR, Hemily B, Ivanovic M and Fleming G. 2005. Transit signal priority (TSP): a planning and implementation handbook, Washington, DC, The United States Department of Transportation,
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasa RS, Beasley PS, Urbanik IIT and Fambro DB. 1995. Model to evaluate the impacts the bus priority on signalized intersections, Transp. Res. Rec., 1494, 117–123. July.
   Google Scholar
• Tamoff PJ. 1975. The results of FHWA urban traffic control research: an interim report, Traffic Eng., 45, (4), 27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Taube RN. 1976. Bus actuated signal preemption systems: a planning methodology, Report UMTA-WI-11-0003-77-1, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Center for Urban Transportation Studies, Milwaukee, WI, May.
   Google Scholar
• Urbanik T II. 1977. Evaluation of priority techniques for high occupancy vehicles on arterial streets. Research Report 2055. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas State Department of Highways and Public Transportation, Texas, July.
   Google Scholar
• Urbanik T, Holder RW and Fitzgerald AV. (1977). Evaluation of alternative concepts for priority use of urban freeways in Texas, Texas Transportation Institute Report, Texas, 205–1.
   Google Scholar
• UTMS Society of Japan. Available: http://www.utms.or.jp/english/system/ptps.html. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Vasudevan M. 2005. Robust optimization model for bus priority control under arterial progression, PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Vlachou K, Collura J and Mermelstein A. 2010. Planning and deploying transit signal priority in small and medium-sized cities: Burlington, Vermont, Case Study, J. Public Transp., 13, (3), 101–123.
   Google Scholar
• Wattleworth JA, Courage KG and Wallace EC. 1977. Evaluation of some bus priority strategies on NW 7th avenue in Miami, Transp. Res. Rec., 626, 32–35.
   Google Scholar
• Wilbur Smith and Associates, Westinghouse Airbrake Co. and Institute of Public Administration. 1968. Study of evolutionary urban transportation, Volumes I, II and III. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Wu J and Lin Z. 2007. An operational analysis of the BRT system along Beijing South-Central Corridor, Urban Transp China, 5, (4), 76–80. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Yagar S and Han B. 1994. A procedure for real-time signal control that considers transit interference and priority, Transp. Res. B, 28, (4), 315–331.
   Google Scholar
• Yan F, Li K and Sun J. 2009. Detector location for transit signal priority at intersection with countdown signals, J. Transp. Inf. Saf., 6, 79–83.. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J. 2011. Evaluation the environmental impacts of bus priority strategies at traffic signals, PhD dissertation, University of Southampton, Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Lu H, Shi Q et al. 2004. Optimal signal-planning method of intersections based on bus priority, J. Traffic Transp. Eng., 4, (3), 49–53. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Zhou G and Gan A. 2005. Performance of transit signal priority with queue jumper lanes, Transp. Res. Rec., 1925, 265–271.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou G and Gan A. 2006. Determination of optimal detector locations for transit signal priority with queue jumper lanes, Transp. Res. Rec., 1978, 123–129.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou G and Gan A. 2009. Design of transit signal priority at signalized intersections with queue jumper lanes, J. Public Transp., 12, (4).
   Google Scholar
• Zlatkovic M, Martin PT and Tasic I. 2011. Implementation of transit signal priority and predictive priority strategies in ASC/3 software-in-the-loop simulation, 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Washington, DC, USA. October.
   Google Scholar