New time-based surrogate safety measure to assess crash risk in car-following scenarios

References

• Archer J. 2005. Indicators for traffic safety assessment and prediction and their application in micro-simulation modeling: a study of urban and suburban intersections. Unpublished PhD thesis. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Barcelo J, Montero L, Perarnau J and Torday A. 2003. Safety indicators for micro-simulation based assessments. In: 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Brian L, Allen B, Shin T and Cooper PJ. 1978. Analysis of traffic conflicts and collisions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 667, pp.67–74.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper PJ. 1983. Experience with traffic conflicts in Canada with emphasis on ‘post encroachment time’ techniques. In: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on International Calibration Study of Traffic Conflict Technique. Copenhagen, Denmark, 25–27 May 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Cunto FJC. 2008. Assessing safety performance of transportation systems using microscopic simulation, Unpublished PhD thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, Waterloo, Canada
   Google Scholar
• Gettman D and Head L. 2003. Surrogate safety measures from traffic simulation models. Technical Report, Federal Highway Administration – FHWA-RD-03-050.
   Google Scholar
• Gousios S and Garber NJ. 2009. Relationship between time to collision conflicts and crashes on interstate highways subjected to truck lane restrictions. In: 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC, 11 January 2009–15 January 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward J. 1971. Near misses as a measure of safety at urban intersections. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst S and Graham R. 1997. The format and presentation of collision warnings. In: Y. I. Noy, ed. Ergonomics and safety of intelligent driver interfaces. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 432p.
   Google Scholar
• Hogema JH and Janssen WH. 1996. Effects of intelligent cruise control on driving behavior. Report TM-1996-C-12. Soesterberg, the Netherlands: TNO Human Factors.
   Google Scholar
• Laureshyn A, Svensson A and Hyden Ch. 2010. Evaluation of traffic safety, based on micro-level behavioral data: Theoretical framework and first implementation, Accident analysis&prevention. Volume, 42, issue 6, pp.1637–1646.
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer RJ, Leblanc DJ and Flannagan CA. 2005. Developing an inverse time-to collision crash alert timing approach based on drivers’ last-second braking and steering judgments. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37, pp.295–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minderhoud MM and Bovy PHL. 2001. Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 33, pp.89–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NGSIM, June 5, 2009. Next generation simulation. Available: http://http://ngsim-community.org/
   Google Scholar
• Ozbay K, Yang H, Bartin B and Mudigond S. 2008. Derivation and validation of new simulation-based surrogate safety measure. Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board No. 2083, pp.105–13.
   Google Scholar
• Saffarzadeh M, Nadimi N, Nasealavi S and Mamdoohi AR. 2013. A general formulation for time to collision. In: Proceedings of the ICE Transport, Volume 166, pp.294–304, London: Institution of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Sobhani A, Young W, Sarvi M and Bahrololoom S. 2013. Calculating time-to-collision for analyzing right turning behavior at signalized intersections. Road and Transport Research, 22(3), pp.49–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Horst A. 1990. A time-based analysis of road user behavior in normal and critical encounters. TNO Institute for Perception, Soesterberg, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Horst R and Hogema J. 1993. Time-to-collision and collision avoidance systems. In: Proceedings of the 6th ICTCT Workshop: Safety Evaluation of Traffic Systems: Traffic Conflicts and Other Measures. Salzburg, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel K. 2003. A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, pp.427–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young W, Sobhani A, Lenne M and Sarvi M. 2014. Simulation of safety: a review of the state of the art in road safety simulation modeling. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 66, pp.89–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar