Compressive origin-destination estimation

References

• Abrahamsson, T. 1998. Estimation of origin-destination matrices using traffic counts – A literature survey. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis - IIASA Vol. 27, 76. technical Interim Report IR-98-021.
   Google Scholar
• Asakura, Y., Hato, E. and Kashiwadani, M. 2000. Origin-destination matrices estimation model using automatic vehicle identification data and its application to the han-shin expressway network, Transportation, 27, (4), 419–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barcelo, J. and Casas, J. 2005. Editors: R. Kitamura and M. Kuwahara, Dynamic network simulation with AIMSUN. In: Simulation approaches in transportation analysis, 57–98, Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, M. G. H. 1991. The estimation of origin-destination matrices by constrained generalized least squares, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 25, (1), 13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bera, S. and Krishna Rao, K. V. 2011. Estimation of origin-destination matrix from traffic counts: the state of the art, European Transport, 49, 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bert, E. 2009. Dynamic urban origin-destination matrix estimation methodology. PhD. dissertation, EPFL.
   Google Scholar
• Bierlaire, M. 2002. The total demand scale: a new measure of quality for static and dynamic origin-destination trip tables, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 36, (9), 837–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candes, E. J. 2006. Compressive sampling, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, 3, 1433–1452.
   Google Scholar
• Candes, E. J. and Tao, T. 2005. Decoding via linear programming, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 51, (12), 4203–4215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candes, E. J. and Wakin, M. 2008. An introduction to compressive sampling, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 25, (2), 21–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candes, E. J., Romberg, J. and Tao, T. 2006. Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52, (2), 489–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candes, E. J., Wakin, M. B. and Boyd, S. P. 2008. Enhancing sparsity by reweighted l\ minimization, Journal of Fourier analysis and applications, 14, (5-6), 877–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascetta, E. 1984. Estimation of trip matrices from traffic counts and survey data: a generalized least squares estimator, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 18, (4), 289–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo, E., Jimenez, P., Menendez, J. M. and Conejo, A. J. 2008. The observability problem in traffic network models: algebraic and topological methods, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 23, (3), 208–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. S., Donoho, D. L. and Saunders, M. A. 1999. Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 20, (1), 33–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremer, M. and Keller, H. 1987. A new class of dynamic methods for the identification of origin-destination flows, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 21, (2), 117–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoho, D. L. 2006. Compressed sensing, IEEE transactions on information theory, 52, (4), 1289–1306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazelton, M. L. 2003. Some comments on origin-destination matrix estimation, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 37, (10), 811–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang, L. and Poteat, V. P. 1980. Estimating vehicle miles of travel by using random sampling techniques, Transportation Research Record, 779, p. 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kumapley, R. K. and Fricker, J. D. 1996. Review of methods for estimating vehicle miles traveled, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1551, (1), 59–66.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, J. and Varaiya, P. 2005. Real-time estimation of origin-destination matrices with partial trajectories from electronic toll collection tag data, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1923, (1), 119–126.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, S. and Dupuis, C. 1984. An efficient method for computing traffic equilibria in networks with asymmetric transportation costs, Transportation Science, 18, (2), 185–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlsson, H., Ljung, L. and Boyd, S. 2010. Segmentation of ARX-models using sum-of-norms regularization, Automatica, 46, (6), 1107–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okutani, I. and Stephanedes, Y. J. 1984. Dynamic prediction of traffic volume through kalman filtering theory, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 18, (1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, W., Yuan, Y., Goncalves, J. and Stan, G. 2012. Reconstruction of arbitrary biochemical reaction networks: a compressive sensing approach. In: Proceedings of the 51th IEEE conference on decision and control, 2334–2339, Maui, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Sanandaji, B. M. 2012. Compressive system identification (CSI): theory and applications of exploiting sparsity in the analysis of high dimensional dynamical systems. PhD. Dissertation, Colorado School of Mines.
   Google Scholar
• Sanandaji, B. M., Vincent, T. L. and Wakin, M. B. 2011. Compressive topology identification of interconnected dynamic systems via clustered orthogonal matching pursuit. In: Proceedings of the 50th IEEE conference on decision and control, 174–180, Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Sanandaji, B. M., Vincent, T. L., Poolla, K. and Wakin, M. B. 2012. A tutorial on recovery conditions for compressive system identification of sparse channels. In: Proceedings of the 51th IEEE conference on decision and control, 6277–6283, Maui, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Borhan M. Sanandaji, Michael B. Wakin and Tyrone L. Vincent. 2014. Observability with random observations, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 59, (11), 3002–3007.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, P., Bhaskar, B. N., Tang, G. and Recht, B. 2012. Linear system identification via atomic norm regularization. In: Proceedings of the 51th IEEE conference on decision and control, 6265–6270, Maui, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Toth, R., Sanandaji, B. M., Poolla, K. and Vincent, T. L. 2011. Compressive system identification in the linear time-invariant framework. In: Proceedings of the 50th IEEE conference on decision and control and European control conference: Orlando, FL, US, 783–790.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Zijpp, N. J. 1997. Dynamic origin-destination matrix estimation from traffic counts and automated vehicle identification data, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1607, (1), 87–94.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zuylen, H. J. and Willumsen, L. G. 1980. The most likely trip matrix estimated from traffic counts, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 14, (3), 281–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbas, I. O., Mahmassani, H. S. and Zhang, K. 2011. Time-dependent origin-destination demand estimation, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2263, (1), 45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., Sasaki, T., Iida, Y. and Asakura, Y. 1992. Estimation of origin-destination matrices from link traffic counts on congested networks, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 26, (6), 417–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., Xi, N., Sun, L. and Song, B. 2012. Stability analysis of non-vector space control via compressive feedbacks. In: Proceedings of the 51th IEEE conference on decision and control, 5685–5690, Maui, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, X. and Mahmassani, H. S. 2006. Dynamic origin-destination demand estimation using automatic vehicle identification data, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 7, (1), 105–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., Erdogan, S. and Mahmassani, H. S. 2006. Dynamic origin-destination trip demand estimation for subarea analysis, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1964, (1), 176–184.
   Google Scholar