Biomechanical measures of knee joint mobilization

References

• Helmick CG, Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Gabriel S, Hirsch R, Kwoh CK, et al.. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part I. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:15–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aluoch MA, Wao HO. Risk factors for occupational osteoarthritis: a literature review. AAOHN J 2009;57:283–90; quiz 91–2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murphy L, Schwartz TA, Helmick CG, Renner JB, Tudor G, Koch G, et al.. Lifetime risk of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:1207–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, Arnold LM, Choi H, Deyo RA, et al.. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:26–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Jordan JM. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2008;34:515–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laupattarakasem W, Laopaiboon M, Laupattarakasem P, Sumananont C. Arthroscopic debridement for knee osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;(1):CD005118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Psaty BM, Furberg CD. COX-2 inhibitors–lessons in drug safety. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1133–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittenberg RH, Schell E, Krehan G, Maeumbaed R, Runge H, Schluter P, et al.. First-dose analgesic effect of the cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitor lumiracoxib in osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison with celecoxib [NCT00267215]. Arthritis Res Ther 2006;8:R35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Towheed TE, Maxwell L, Judd MG, Catton M, Hochberg MC, Wells G. Acetaminophen for osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(1):CD004257.
   Google Scholar
• Nussmeier NA, Whelton AA, Brown MT, Langford RM, Hoeft A, Parlow JL, et al.. Complications of the COX-2 inhibitors parecoxib and valdecoxib after cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1081–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyle GD, Allison SC, Matekel RL, Ryder MG, Stang JM, Gohdes DD, et al.. Physical therapy treatment effectiveness for osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized comparison of supervised clinical exercise and manual therapy procedures versus a home exercise program. Phys Ther 2005;85:1301–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyle GD, Henderson NE, Matekel RL, Ryder MG, Garber MB, Allison SC. Effectiveness of manual physical therapy and exercise in osteoarthritis of the knee. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:173–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottawa panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for therapeutic exercises and manual therapy in the management of osteoarthritis. Phys Ther 2005;85:907–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Physical Therapy Association. Guide to Physical Therapist Practice. Second Edition. American Physical Therapy Association. Phys Ther 2001;81:9–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitland G D, Hengeveld E, Banks K, ed, editors. Maitland’s peripheral manipulation. 4th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Grieve G. Mobilisation of the spine. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Bialosky JE, Bishop MD, Price DD, Robinson ME, George SZ. The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: a comprehensive model. Man Ther 2009;14:531–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialosky JE, George SZ, Bishop MD. How spinal manipulative therapy works: why ask why? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2008;38:293–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluka KA, Skyba DA, Radhakrishnan R, Leeper BJ, Wright A. Joint mobilization reduces hyperalgesia associated with chronic muscle and joint inflammation in rats. J Pain 2006;7:602–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triano JJ. Biomechanics of spinal manipulative therapy. Spine J 2001;1:121–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLean S, Naish R, Reed L, Urry S, Vicenzino B. A pilot study of the manual force levels required to produce manipulation induced hypoalgesia. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2002;17:304–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass SJ, Rivett DA, Robertson VJ. Manual forces applied during posterior-to-anterior spinal mobilization: a review of the evidence. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2006;29:316–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza MV, Venturini C, Teixeira LM, Chagas MH, de Resende MA. Force-displacement relationship during anteroposterior mobilization of the ankle joint. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2008;31:285–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiradejnant A, Maher CG, Latimer J. Objective manual assessment of lumbar posteroanterior stiffness is now possible. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2003;26:34–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher C, Adams R. Reliability of pain and stiffness assessments in clinical manual lumbar spine examination. Phys Ther 1994;74:801–9; discussion 9–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mootz RD, Keating JC, Kontz HP, Milus TB, Jacobs GE. Intra- and interobserver reliability of passive motion palpation of the lumbar spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1989;12:440–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binkley J, Stratford PW, Gill C. Interrater reliability of lumbar accessory motion mobility testing. Phys Ther 1995;75:786–92; discussion 93–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staes FF, Banks KJ, De Smet L, Daniels KJ, Carels P. Reliability of accessory motion testing at the carpal joints. Man Ther 2009;14:292–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass SJ, Rivett DA, Robertson VJ, Stojanovski E. Real-time feedback improves accuracy of manually applied forces during cervical spine mobilisation. Man Ther 2010;15:19–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latimer J, Lee M, Adams RD. The effects of high and low loading forces on measured values of lumbar stiffness. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1998;21:157–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, et al.. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum 1986;29:1039–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman RD. Criteria for classification of clinical osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl 1991;27:10–2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, et al.. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum 1986;29:1039–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenhof C, Bijlsma JW, van den Ende CH, van Dijk GM, Pisters MF, Dekker J. Psychometric evaluation of osteoarthritis questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Arthritis Rheum 2006;55:480–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Sturmer T, Gunther KP, Brenner H. Reliability and validity of clinical outcome measurements of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee–a review of the literature. Clin Rheumatol 1997;16:185–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988;15:1833–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM. What is the maximum number of levels needed in pain intensity measurement? Pain 1994;58:387–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM, Fisher LD. Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures. Pain 1999;83:157–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957;16:494–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neogi T, Felson D, Niu J, Nevitt M, Lewis CE, Aliabadi P, et al.. Association between radiographic features of knee osteoarthritis and pain: results from two cohort studies. BMJ 2009;339:b2844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright AA, Cook C, Abbott JH. Variables associated with the progression of hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum 2009;61:925–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schiphof D, Boers M, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Differences in descriptions of Kellgren and Lawrence grades of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:1034–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menkes CJ. Radiographic criteria for classification of osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl 1991;27:13–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Portney L, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Snodgrass SJ, Rivett DA, Robertson VJ. Manual forces applied during cervical mobilization. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007;30:17–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms MC, Innes SM, Bader DL. Forces measured during spinal manipulative procedures in two age groups. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999;38:267–74.
   Google Scholar
• Snodgrass SJ, Rivett DA, Robertson VJ, Stojanovski E. Forces applied to the cervical spine during posteroanterior mobilization. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009;32:72–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiradejnant A, Latimer J, Maher CG. Forces applied during manual therapy to patients with low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002;25:362–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms MC, Bader DL. Variability of forces applied by experienced therapists during spinal mobilization. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1997;12:393–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass SJ, Rivett DA, Robertson VJ, Stojanovski E. Cervical spine mobilisation forces applied by physiotherapy students. Physiotherapy 2010;96:120–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass SJ, Rivett DA, Robertson VJ, Stojanovski E. A comparison of cervical spine mobilization forces applied by experienced and novice physiotherapists. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010;40:392–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar