Advanced search
Publication Cover
The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Volume 38, 2015 - Issue 3: The Spinal Cord Injury - Quality of Life Measurement System: Development, Psychometrics, and Item Bank Calibration Guest Editors: David S. Tulsky, PhD and Pamela A. Kisala, MA Guest Associate Editor: J. Scott Richards, PhD
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,729
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Development and psychometric characteristics of the SCI-QOL Ability to Participate and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities item banks and short forms

Allen W. HeinemannCenter for Rehabilitation Outcomes ResearchRehabilitation Institute of Chicago and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 345 E. Superior St. Chicago, IL 60611, USA
,
Pamela A. KisalaCenter on Assessment Research and Translation College of Health Sciences and the Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, STAR Health Sciences Complex, 540 South College Avenue, Newark, DE 19713 USA
,
Elizabeth A. HahnDepartment of Medical Social Sciences and Center for Patient-Centered OutcomesNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
&
David S. TulskyCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 397-408 | Published online: 26 May 2015

References

  • Whiteneck GG. Issues affecting the selection of participation measurement in outcomes research and clinical trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91(9):S54–S9.
  • Magasi S, Post MW. A comparative review of contemporary participation measures’ psychometric properties and content coverage. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91(9):S17–28.
  • Dijkers MP. Issues in the conceptualization and measurement of participation: an overview. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91(9Suppl1):S5–S16.
  • NIH Common Fund 2013 [updated May 20, 2013]. National Institutes of Health Web Site]. Available from: http://www.nihroadmap.nih.gov/.
  • Quatrano L, Cruz T. Future of outcomes measurement: impact on research in medical rehabilitation and neurologic populations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92(10 Suppl):S7–11.
  • Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:1179–94.
  • Stone K. NINDS Common data element project: a long-awaited breakthrough in streamlining trials. Ann Neurol 2010;68:A11–A3.
  • DeWalt DA, Rothrock N, Yount S, Stone AA, Group PC. Evaluation of item candidates: the PROMIS qualitative item review. Med Care 2007;45(5 Suppl 1):S12–21.
  • Castel LD, Williams KA, Bosworth HB, Eisen SV, Hahn EA, Irwin DE, et al. Content validity in the PROMIS social-health domain: a qualitative analysis of focus-group data. Qual Life Res 2008;17(5):737–49.
  • Hahn EA, DeWalt DA, Bode RK, Garcia SF, DeVellis RF, Correia H, et al. New English and Spanish social health measures will facilitate evaluating health determinants. Health Psychol 2014;33(5):490–9.
  • Hahn EA, Devellis RF, Bode RK, Garcia SF, Castel LD, Eisen SV, et al. Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): item bank development and testing. Qual Life Res 2010;19(7):1035–44.
  • Tulsky DS, Kisala PA, Victorson D, Choi SW, Gershon R, Heinemann AW, et al. Methodology for the development and calibration of the SCI-QOL item banks. J Spinal Cord Med 2015;38(3):270–87.
  • Tulsky DS, Kisala PA, Victorson D, Tate D, Heinemann AW, Charlifue S, et al. Overview of the Spinal Cord Injury – Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) measurement system. J Spinal Cord Med 2015;38(3):257–69.
  • Tulsky DS, Kisala PA, Victorson D, Tate D, Heinemann AW, Amtmann D, et al. Developing a contemporary patient-reported outcomes measure for spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92(10):S44–51.
  • PROMIS. PROMIS Instrument Development and Psychometric Evaluation Scientific Standards 2012 [12/27/2012]. Available from: http://www.nihpromis.org/Documents/PROMIS_Standards_050212.pdf.
  • Willis GB. Cognitive Interviewing: a ‘how to’ guide. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute, 1999.
  • MetaMetrics. The LEXILE framework for reading. Durham, NC: MetaMetrics Inc; 1995.
  • Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 1999;6(1):1–55.
  • Samejima F. Graded response model. Handbook of modern item response theory. In: van der Liden WJ, Hambleton R, eds. New York: Springer; 1997. p. 85–100.
  • Bjorner JB, Smith K, Stone C, Sun X. IRTFIT: A Macro for Item Fit and Local Dependence Tests under IRT Models. 2007.
  • Orlando M, Thissen D. Further investigation of the performance of S-X2: An item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models. Appl Psych Meas 2003;27(4):289–98.
  • Choi SW, Gibbons LE, Crane PK. Lordif: An R package for detecting differential item functioning using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item response theory and Monte Carlo simulations. J Stat Softw. 2011;39(8):1.
  • Stocking ML, Lord FM. Developing a common metric in item response theory. Appl Psych Meas 1983;7(2):201–10.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.