Visuotemporal cues clinically improved walking ability of ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury within 5 days

References

• Field-Fote EC. Spinal cord control of movement: implications for locomotor rehabilitation following spinal cord injury. Phys Ther 2000;80(5):477–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrman AL, Harkema SJ. Locomotor training after human spinal cord injury:a series of case studies. Phys Ther 2000;80(7):688–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrman AL, Bowden MG, Nair PM. Neuroplasticity after spinal cord injury and training: an emerging paradigm shift in rehabilitation and walking revovery. Phys Ther 2006;86(10):1406–25. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz V, Fouad K. Restoration of sensorimotor functions after spinal cord injury. Brain 2014;137(Pt 3):654–67. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrman A, Lawless-Dixon A, Davis S, Bowden M, Nair P, Phadke C, et al. Locomotor training progression and outcomes after incomplete spinal cord injury. Phys Ther 2005;85(12):1356–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field-Fote EC, Roach KE. Influence of a locomotor training approach on walking speed and distance in people with chronic spinal cord injury:a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther 2011;91(1):48–60. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirz M, Zemon D, Rupp R, Scheel A, Colombo G, Dietz V, et al. Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: A multicenter trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86(4):672–80. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach-y-Rita P, Kercel S. Sensory substitution and the human-machine interface. Trends Cogn Sci 2003;7(12):541–46. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumway-cook A, Woollacott M. Motor control: Translating research into clinical practice. 3rd ed. Philadephia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Amatachaya S, Amatachaya P, Keawsutthi M, Siritaratiwat W. External cues benefit walking ability of ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2013;36(6):638–44. doi: 10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amatachaya S, Keawsutthi M, Amatachaya P, Manimmanakorn N. Effects of external cues on gait performance in independent ambulatory incomplete spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord 2009;47(9):668–73. doi: 10.1038/sc.2008.168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pramodhyakul N, Amatachaya P, Sooknuan T, Arayawichanon P, Amatachaya S. Effects of a visuotemporal cue on walking ability of independent ambulatory subjects with spinal cord injury as compared with healthy subjects. Spinal Cord 2014;52(3):220–24. doi: 10.1038/sc.2013.160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. Facts and Figures at a Glance 2014. Available at: https://www.nscisc.uab.edu/. Accessed February 9, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Cardenas DD, Hoffman JM, Kirshblum S, McKinley W. Etiology and incidence of rehospitalization after traumatic spinal cord injury: a multicenter analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85(11):1757–63. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.03.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirshblum SC, Burns SP, Biering-Sorensen F, Donovan W, Graves DE, Jha A, et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). J Spinal Cord Med 2011;34:535–46. doi: 10.1179/204577211X13207446293695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth B, van Hedel HJ, Kometer B, Dietz V, Curt A. Changes in activity after a complete spinal cord injury as measured by the Spinal Cord Independence Measure II (SCIM II). Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22(3):279–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson AB, Carnel CT, Ditunno JF, Read MS, Boninger ML, Schmeler MR, et al. Outcome measures for gait and ambulation in the spinal cord injury population. J Spinal Cord Med 2008;31(5):487–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 1987;67(2):206–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poncumhak P, Saengsuwan J, Kamruecha W, Amatachaya S. Reliability and validity of three functional tests in ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2013;51(3):214–17. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapointe R, Lajoie Y, Serresse O, Barbeau H. Functional community ambulation requirements in incomplete spinal cord injured subjects. Spinal Cord 2001;39(6):327–35. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hedel H. Gait speed in relation to categories of functional ambulation after spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23(4):343–50. doi: 10.1177/1545968308324224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saensook W, Poncumhak P, Saengsuwan J, Mato L, Kamruecha W, Amatachaya S. Discriminative ability of the three functional tests in independent ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury who walked with and without ambulatory assistive devices. J Spinal Cord Med 2014;37(2):212–17. doi: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amatachaya S, Naewla S, Srisim K, Arrayawichanon P, Siritaratiwat W. Concurrent validity of the 10-meter walk test as compared with the 6-minute walk test in patients with spinal cord injury at various levels of ability. Spinal Cord 2014;52(4):333–36. doi: 10.1038/sc.2013.171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hedel H, Wirz M, Dietz V. Standardized assessment of walking capacity after spinal cord injury: the European network approach. Neurol Res 2008;30(1):61–73. doi: 10.1179/016164107X230775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mong Y, Teo TW, Ng SS. 5-repetition sit-to-stand test in subjects with chronic stroke: reliability and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91(3):407–13. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney S, Wrisley D, Marchetti G, Gee M, Redfern M, Furman J. Clinical measurement of sit-to-stand performance in people with balance disorders: validity of data for the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test. Phys Ther 2005;85(10):1034–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirtley C. Clinical gait analysis:theory and practice. Edinburgh, Livingstone: Edinburgh; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Murray MP, Mollinger LA, Gardner GM, Sepic SB. Kinematic and EMG patterns during slow, free, and fast walking. J Orthop Res 1984;2(3):272–80. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100020309
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Capo-Lugo CE, Mullens CH, Brown DA. Maximum walking speeds obtained using treadmill and overground robot system in persons with post-stroke hemiplegia. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012;9:80. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-80
   Google Scholar
• Lamontagne A, Fung J. Faster Is better. Implications for speed-intensive gait training after stroke. Stroke 2004;35(11):2543–48.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson J. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin company; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Newell KM, Vaillancourt DE. Dimensional change in motor learning. Hum Mov Sci 2001;20(4–5):695–715. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9457(01)00073-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam T, Noonan VK, Eng JJ. A systematic review of functional ambulation outcome measures in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2008;46(4):246–54. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul SS, Canning CG, Sherrington C, Fung VS. Reproducibility of measures of leg muscle power, leg muscle strength, postural sway and mobility in people with Parkinson's disease. Gait Posture 2012;36(3):639–42. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.04.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar