Curriculum issues and benefits in supportive co-taught classes for students with intellectual disabilities

References

• Antia SD. 1999. The roles of special educators and classroom teachers in an inclusive school. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4, 203–214.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Austin VL. 2001. Teachers’ beliefs about co-teaching. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 245–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley C. 2005. Establishing and maintaining collaborative relationships between regular and special education teachers in middle school social studies inclusive classrooms. In: Scruggs T E and Mastropieri M A, eds. Cognition and learning in diverse settings. Vol. 18. Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities. Oxford: Elsevier, pp.153–198.
   Google Scholar
• Cook L, McDuffie-Landrum KA, Oshita L and Cothren-Cook S. 2011. Co-teaching for students with disabilities: a critical analysis of the empirical literature. In: Kauffman J M and Hallahan D P, eds. Handbook of special education. London: Routledge, pp.147–159.
   Google Scholar
• Friend M and Cook L. 2007. Interactions: collaboration skills for school professionals. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber PJ and Popp PA. 1999. Consumer perspectives on the collaborative teaching model. Views of students with disabilities with and without LD and their parents. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 288–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilberts GH, Agran M, Hughes C and Wehmeyer M. 2001. The effects of peer delivered self-monitoring strategies on the participation of students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hang Q and Rabren K. 2009. An examination of co-teaching. Perspectives and efficacy indicators. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 259–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez BA, Browder DM, Spooner F and Oibiase W. 2012. Inclusive inquiry science using peer-mediated embedded instruction for students with moderate intellectual disability. Exceptional Children, 78, 301–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones T and Sterling DR. 2011. Cooperative learning in an inclusive science classroom. Science Scope, 35, 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Law 2817/2000. The education of persons with special educational needs and other regulations. FEK 14 May 2000, v. A’, no. 78.
   Google Scholar
• Law 3699/2008. Special education and education of people with disability or special educational needs. FEK 2 October 2008, v. A’, no. 199.
   Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Wehmeyer ML, Palmer SB, Soukup JH and Little TD. 2008. Self-determination and access to the general education curriculum. The Journal of Special Education, 42, 91–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magiera K, Smith C, Zigmond N and Gebauer K. 2005. Benefits of co-teaching in mathematics classes. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37, 20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Mastropieri MA, Scruggs TE, Graetz J, Norland J, Gardizi W and McDuffie KA. 2005. Case studies in co-teaching in the content areas: successes, failures and challenges. Intervention in Schools and Clinic, 40, 260–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell J. 2011. Instructional context. In: Kauffman J M and Hallahan D P, eds. Handbook of special education. London: Routledge, pp. 532–544.
   Google Scholar
• Miles MB and Huberman AM. 1994Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook.. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moin LJ, Magiera K and Zigmond N. 2009. Instructional activities and group work in the US inclusive high school co-taught science class. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 677–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murawski WW and Swanson H. 2001. A meta-analysis of co-teaching research. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 258–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murawski WW 2010. Collaborative teaching in elementary schools. Making the co-teaching marriage work! California: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Parlett MR. 1990. Illuminative evaluation. In: Walberg J H and Haertel G D, eds. The international encyclopaedia of educational evaluation. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. 1997. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Polloway EA, Patton JR and Nelson MA. 2011. Intellectual and developmental disabilities. In: Kauffman J M and Hallahan D P, eds. Handbook of special education. London: Routledge, pp. 175–187.
   Google Scholar
• Rose D, Meyer A and Hitchcock C. 2005. The universally designed classroom: accessible curriculum and digital technologies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scruggs TE, Mastropieri M and McDuffie KA. 2007. Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: a metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73, 392–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soukup JH, Wehmeyer ML, Bashinski SM and Bovaird JA. 2007. Classroom variables and access to the general curriculum for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74, 101–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake RE. 2005. Case studies. In: Denzin N K and Lincoln Y S, eds. Handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed. London: Sage, pp.236–247.
   Google Scholar
• Strogilos V and Tragoulia E 2013. Inclusive and collaborative practices in co-taught classrooms: roles for teachers and parents. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas G. 2011. How to do your case study. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thousand S, Nevin AI and Villa RA. 2007. Collaborative teaching: a critique of the scientific evidence. In: Florian L, ed. The Sage handbook of special education. London: Sage, pp. 417–429.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn S, Klingner JK and Bryant DP. 2001. Collaborative strategic reading as a means to enhance peer-mediated instruction for reading comprehension and content-area learning. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 66–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter-Thomas CS. 1997. Co-teaching experiences: the benefits and problems that teachers and principals report over time. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 395–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer ML, Agran M and Hughes C 2000. A national survey of teachers’ promotion of self-determination and student directed learning. Journal of Special Education, 34, 58–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer ML, Lattin DL, Lapp-Rincker G and Agran M 2003. Access to the general curriculum of middle school students with mental retardation. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 262–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer ML. 2011. Access to general education curriculum for students with significant cognitive disabilities. In: Kauffman J M and Hallahan D P, eds. Handbook of special education. London: Routledge, pp.544–556.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss MP and Brigham FJ. 2000. Co-teaching and the model of shared responsibility: what does the research support? In: Scruggs T E and Mastropieri M A, eds. Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities. Oxford: Elsevier, pp.217–245.
   Google Scholar
• Welch M. 2000. Descriptive analysis of team teaching in two elementary classrooms: a formative experimental approach. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 366–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar