Assessing cognitive abilities in children with autism: practitioner evaluation of treatment validity

References

• Aljunied, M. and Frederickson, N. 2011 Cognitive indicators of different levels of special educational support needs in autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, pp.368–76. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2010.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljunied, M. and Frederickson, N. 2013 Does central coherence relate cognitive performance in children with autism? Autism, 17(2), pp.178–93. doi: 10.1177/1362361311409960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA) and National Council on Measurement for Education (NCME). 1999. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Apperly, I. A. 2012. What is ‘theory of mind’? Concepts, cognitive processes and individual differences. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, pp.825–39. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.676055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S. 1989. The autistic child’s theory of mind: a case of specific developmental delay. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, pp.285–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1989.tb00241.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S. 1992. Out of sight or out of mind? Another look at deception in autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 7, pp.1141–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1992.tb00934.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S. 2005. Theory of mind and autism: a fifteen year review. In: S. Baron-Cohen et al. eds. Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M. and Frith, U. 1985. Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’? Cognition, 4, pp.37–46. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begeer, S., Gevers, C., Clifford, P., Verhoeve, M., Kat, K., Hoddenbach, E. and Boer, F. 2011. Theory of mind training in children with autism: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(8), pp.997–1006. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-1121-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, R. J. R. 2008. Fine cuts of empathy and the amygdala: dissociable deficits in psychopathy and autism. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(1), pp.157–70. doi: 10.1080/17470210701508855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambell, J. M., Brown, R. T., Cavanagh, S. E., Vess, S. F. and Segall, M. J. 2008. Evidence-based assessment of cognitive functioning in pediatric psychology. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 33(9), 999–1014. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charman, T., Jones, C. R. G., Pickles, A., Simonoff, E., Baird, G. and Happe, F. 2011. Research report: defining the cognitive phenotype of autism. Brain Research, 1380, pp.10–21. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.10.075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, R. and Reynolds, Y. 2000. The use of dynamic assessment by EP's in the UK. Educational Psychology in Practice, 16(3), pp.311–31. doi: 10.1080/713666083
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, A. L. and Olswang, L. B. 2007. Investigating requests for information in children with autism spectrum disorders: Static versus dynamic assessment. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 9(4), pp.297–311. doi: 10.1080/14417040701413720
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, A. L. and Olswang, L. B. 2007. Investigating requests for information in children with autism spectrum disorders: Static versus dynamic assessment. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 9(4), pp.297–311. doi: 10.1080/14417040701413720
   Google Scholar
• Emslie, H., Wilson, C., Burden, V., Nimmo-Smith, I. and Wilson, B. 2003 Behavioural assessment of dysexecutive syndrome for children (BADS-C). UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, N., Happe, F. and Dunn, J. 2005. The relationship between vocabulary, grammar, and false belief task performance in children with autistic spectrum disorders and children with moderate learning difficulties. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, pp.409–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00371.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, D. P., Andrews, T. J. and Genshaft, J. L. 1997. The functional utility of intelligence tests with special education populations. In D. P. Flanagan et al., eds. Contemporary intellectual assessment: theories, tests and issues. London: Guildford Press, pp. 457–83.
   Google Scholar
• Gallery, M. E. and Hofmeister, A. M. 1978. A method for assessing the treatment validity of tests in special education. The Exceptional Child, 25(2), pp.105–13. doi: 10.1080/0156655780250203
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, L. D. 2002. Changing conceptions of measurement validity: an update on the new Standards. Journal of Nursing Education, 41(3), pp.100–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresham, F. M. and Witt, J. C. 1997. Utility of intelligence tests for treatment planning, classification, and placement decisions: Recent empirical findings and future directions. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, pp.249–67. doi: 10.1037/h0088961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadwin, J., Baron-Cohen, S., Howlin, P. and Hill, K. 1997. Does teaching theory of mind have an effect on the ability to develop conversation in children with autism? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 27(5), pp.519–38. doi: 10.1023/A:1025826009731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haney, M. and Evans, J. 1999. National survey of school psychologists regarding use of dynamic assessment and other nontraditional assessment techniques. Psychology in the Schools, 36(4), pp.295–304. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(199907)36:4<295::AID-PITS3>3.0.CO;2-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happe, F. 1995. The role of age and verbal ability in theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism. Child Development, 66, pp.843–55. doi: 10.2307/1131954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haywood, H. C., Brown, A. L. and Wingenfeld, S. 1990. Dynamic approach to psycho-educational assessment. School Psychology Review, 19, pp.411–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, E. L. 2004. Evaluating the theory of executive dysfunction in autism. Developmental Review, 24, pp.189–233. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2004.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, J. A. 2004. The social contexts of focus groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 33(5), pp.602–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, T. L., Prelock, P. A. and Bonazinga, L. 2012. Psychometric evaluation of the theory of mind inventory (ToMI): a study of typically developing children and children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(3), pp.327–341. doi: 10.1007/s10803-011-1244-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanoff, S. D. and Hultberg, J. 2006. Understanding the multiple realities of everyday life: basic assumptions in focus-group methodology. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 13, pp.125–32. doi: 10.1080/11038120600691082
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klin, A. and Volkmar, F. R. 1997. Asperger syndrome. In D. Cohen and F. R. Volkmar, eds. Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, pp.94–122.
   Google Scholar
• Klin, A. and Volkmar, F. R. 2000. Treatment and intervention guidelines for individuals with Asperger syndrome. In A. Klin et al., eds. Asperger syndrome. New York: Guilford Press, pp.340–66.
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, L. G. and Renner, P. 2000. Performance-based measures in autism: Implications for diagnosis. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29, pp.479–92. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP2904_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruegar, R. A. and Casey. 2009. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 4th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kuckartz, U. 1998. winMAX: scientific text analysis for social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lauchlan, F. and Elliott, J. 1997. The use of the cognitive modifiability battery as an intervention tool for children with complex learning difficulties. Educational and Child Psychology, 14(4), pp.137–48.
   Google Scholar
• Livanis, A. and Mouzakitis, A. 2010. The treatment validity of autism screening instruments. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35(4), pp.206–17. doi: 10.1177/1534508410381041
   Google Scholar
• Lord, C., Rutter, M. and DiLavore, P. 1989. Autism diagnostic observation schedule: a standardised observation of communicative and social behaviour. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 19, pp.185–212. doi: 10.1007/BF02211841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C., Rutter, M. and Le Couteur, A. 1994. Autism diagnostic interview – revised: a revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, pp.659–85. doi: 10.1007/BF02172145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luiselli, J. K., Campbell, S., Cannon, B., DiPertro, E., Ellis, J. T., Tasra, M. and Lifter, K. K. 2001. Assessment instruments used in the education and treatment of persons with autism: brief report of a survey of national service centers. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 22, pp.389–98. doi: 10.1016/S0891-4222(01)00079-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mash, E. J. and Hunsley, J. 2005. Evidence-based assessment of child and adolescent disorders: issues and challenges. Journal of Clinical and Adolescent Psychology, 34(3), pp.362–79. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3403_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. 1988. The once and future uses of validity: assessing the meaning and consequences of validity. In H. Wainer and H. I. Braun, eds. Test validity. Hilldale: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.112–56.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B. and Hubermann, A. M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. 1998. The focus group guidebook. Book 1. Planning Focus Groups. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ozonoff, S., Goodlin-Jones, B. L. and Solomon, M. 2005. Evidence-based assessment of autism spectrum disorders in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, pp.523–40. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3403_8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozonoff, S., Pennington, B. F. and Rogers, S. J. 1991. Executive function deficits in high-functioning autistic individuals: relation to theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32, pp.1081–1105. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1991.tb00351.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perner, J., Leekam, S. and Wimmer, H. 1987. Three year olds’ difficulty with false belief: the case for conceptual deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, pp.125–37. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1987.tb01048.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schopler, E. and Mesibov, G. B. eds. 1995. Learning and cognition in autism. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shallice, T. 1982. Specific impairments in planning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 298, pp.199–209. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1982.0082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg., R. J. ed. 2000. Handbook of intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. and Grigorenko, E. L. 2002. Dynamic testing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, K. Z. D., Zaitchik, D. and Tager-Flusberg, H. 1994. Preschoolers can attribute second order beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 30, pp.395–402. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.30.3.395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tager-Flusberg, H. 2007. Evaluating the theory-of-mind hypothesis of autism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, pp.311–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00527.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzuriel, D. 1995. The cognitive modifiability battery (CMB) assessment & intervention. Instruction manual. Israel: Bar-Ilan University, School of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tzuriel, D. 2000. ‘The Cognitive Modifiability Battery (CMB) – assessment & intervention: development of a dynamic assessment instrument. In: C. S. Lidtz and J. Elliott, eds. Dynamic assessment: prevailing models and applications. Greenwich: Jai Press, pp.375–406.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn., S., Schumm, J. S. and Sinagub, J. 1996. Focus group interviews in education and psychology. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. 1996a. Manual for the Wechsler intelligence scales for children. 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. (Singapore Version).
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. 1996b Technical manual for the Wechsler intelligence scales for children. 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. (Singapore Version).
   Google Scholar
• Zelazo, P. D., Müller, U., Frye, D. and Marcovitch, S. 2003. Development of executive function. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 68(3), pp.11–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar