2,476
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Reviewing the development, evidence base, and application of the revised dengue case classification

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 94-101 | Published online: 12 Nov 2013

References

  • WHO. Technical guides for diagnosis, treatment, surveillance, prevention and control of dengue haemorrhagic fever. Geneva: WHO (Southeast Asian and Western Pacific Regional Offices); 1975.
  • WHO. Dengue haemorrhagic fever: diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control. 2nd ed. Geneva: WHO; 1997.
  • Rigau-Perez JG. Severe dengue: the need for new case definitions. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:297–302.
  • Deen J, Harris E, Wills B, Balmaseda A, Hammond SN, Rocha C, et al.. The WHO dengue classification and case definitions: time for a reassessment. Lancet. 2006;368:170–3.
  • Halstead SB. Dengue — the case definition dilemma: a commentary. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007;26(4):291–2.
  • Bandyopadhyay S, Lum LC, Kroeger A. Classifying dengue: a review of the difficulties in using the WHO case classification for dengue haemorrhagic fever. Trop Med Int Health. 2006;11(8):1238–55.
  • Santamaria R, Martinez E, Kratochwill S, Soria C, Tan LH, Nunez A, et al.. Comparison and critical appraisal of dengue clinical guidelines and their use in Asia and Latin America. Int Health. 2009;1:133–40.
  • Alexander N, Balmaseda A, Castelobranco I, Dimaano E, Hien TT, Hung NT, et al.. Evidence for a revised dengue case classification: a multi-centre prospective study across Southeast Asia and Latin America. Trop Med Int Health. 2011;16(8):936–48.
  • WHO. Dengue: guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control [Internet]. New edition. Geneva: WHO [cited 2011 Mar 6]. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241547871_eng.pdf.
  • Barniol J, Gazkowski R, Vega Barbato E, Venâncio da Cunha R, Salgado D, Martínez E, et al.. Usefulness and applicability of the revised dengue case classification by disease severity: multi-center study in 18 countries. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:106.
  • Last JM. A dictionary of epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995.
  • CDC. Centres for Prevention and Disease Control, Dengue, Clinical Guidance. Atlanta (GA): CDC [cited 2011 Mar 6]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/dengue/clinicalLab/clinical.html.
  • Srikiatkhachorn A, Gibbons RV, Green S, Libraty DH, Thomas SJ, Endy TP, et al.. Dengue hemorrhagic fever: the sensitivity and specificity of the World Health Organization, definition for identification of severe cases of dengue in Thailand, 1994–2005. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:1135–43.
  • Toumani Touré A. The Bamako call to action: research for health. Lancet. 2008;372(9653):1855.
  • Lavis JN, Guindon GE, Cameron D, Boupha B, Dejman M, Osei EJ, et al.. Bridging the gaps between research, policy and practice in low- and middle-income countries: a survey of researchers. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182(9):350–61.
  • Basuki PS, Budiyanto PuspitasariD, Husada D, Darmowandowo W, Ismoedijanto, et al.. Application of revised dengue classification criteria as a severity marker of dengue viral infection in Indonesia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2010;41(5):1088–94.
  • Narvaez F, Gutierrez G, Perez MA, Elizondo D, Nunez A, Balmaseda A, et al.. Evaluation of the traditional and revised WHO classifications of dengue disease severity. PLoS NTD. 2011;5(11):e1397.
  • Srikiatkhachorn A, Rothman AL, Gibbons RV, Sittisombut N, Malasit P, Ennis FA, et al.. Dengue — how best to classify it. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53(6):563–7.
  • Kalayanarooj S. Dengue classification: current WHO vs. the newly suggested classification for better clinical application? J Med Assoc Thai. 2011;94(Suppl 3):S74–84.