Community-based dengue vector control: experiences in behavior change in Metropolitan Manila, Philippines

References

• Philippines. Department of Health. Disease Surveillance Report (Dengue), Morbidity Week 52, December 25–31. Manila: Public Health Surveillance and Informatics Division, NEC. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Suwanbamrung C. Community capacity for sustainable community-based dengue prevention and control: domain, assessment and capacity building model. As Pac J Trop Med. 2010; 3(6): 499–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khun S, Manderson L. Community and school-based health education for dengue control in rural Cambodia: a process evaluation. PLoS Neg Trop Dse. 2008;1(3): e143. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000143
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez L, Perez D, Perez T, Sosa T, Cruz G, Kouri G, Boelaert M, Van der Stuyft P. Intersectoral coordination in Aedes aegypti control. A pilot project in Havana City, Cuba. Trop Med Int Health. 2005;10(1):82–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heintze C, Velasco-Garrido M, Kroeger A. What do community-based dengue control programmes achieve? A systematic review of published evaluations. Trans Royal Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101:317–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickizer TM, Von Korff M, Cheadle A, Maeser J, Wagner E, Pearson D, Beery W, Psaty B. Activating communities for health promotion: a process evaluation method. Am J Pub Health. 1993;83(4):561–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espino F, Koops V, Manderson L. Community participation in tropical disease control in resource-poor settings. UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, 2004; TDS/STR/SEB/ST/04·1 Special Topics No. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Halstead SB. Successes and failures in dengue control – global experience. WHO. [online] 2002; [cited 28 January 2011]; Available from: <http://www.bvsde.paho.org/bvsasv/fulltext/suce.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Erlanger TE, Keiser J, Utzinger J. Effect of dengue vector control interventions on entomological parameters in developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Vet Entom. 2008;22(3):203–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegel J, Bennet S, Hattersley L, Hayden MH, Kittayapong P, Nalim S, Wang D, Zielinski-Gutierrez E, Gubler D. Barriers and bridges to prevention and control of dengue: the need for a social-ecological approach. EcoHealth. 2005;2:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hairi F, Ong CHS, Suhaimi A, Tsung TW, Anis Ahmad MA, Sundaraj C, Soc M. A knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) study on selected rural communities in the Kual Kangsal District. As Pac J Pub Health. 2003;15(1):37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Focks D. A review of entomological sampling methods and indicators for dengue vectors. UNICEF/UNDP/WB/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases 2003. TDR/IDE/Den/03·1.
   Google Scholar
• Parks W, Lloyd LS. Planning social mobilization and communication for dengue fever prevention and control – a step-by-step guide. Geneva: WHO. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Romani MET, Vanlerberghe V, Perez D, Lefevre P, Ceballos E, Bandera D, Gil AB, Van der Stuyft P. Achieving sustainability of community-based dengue control in Santiago de Cuba. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:976–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arunachalam N, Tana S, Abeyewickreme W, Espino F, Kittayapong P, Wai KT, Horstick O, Sommerfeld J. Eco-bio-social determinants of dengue vector breeding: a multicountry study study in urban and periurban Asia. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88:173–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeyewickreme W, Arunachalam N, Tana S, Espino F, Kittayapong P, Wai K, Tyagi B, Htun P, Koyadun S, Kroeger A, Sommerfeld J. (under review). Estimating dengue vector abundance in the wet and dry season: Implications for targeted vector control in urban and peri-urban Asia.
   Google Scholar
• Aunger R, Curtis V. Consolidating behaviour change theory. LSHT/Hygiene Centre. [online] 2007; [cited 29 October 2012]; Available from: <http://www.hygienecentral.org.uk/pdf/Lifebuoy%20Behaviour%20Change%20Report.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Backer T, David S, Saucy G. Reviewing the Behavioral Science Knowledge Base on Technology Transfer. NIDA Reseach Monograph 155: Fishbein M. Developing effective behaviour change interventions: some lessons learned from behavioral research 1995: 246–261.
   Google Scholar
• Ziff MA, Harper GW, Chutuape KS, Deeds BG, Futterman D, Francisco VT, Muenz LR., Ellen JM. Laying the foundation for connect to protect®: a multi-site community mobilization intervention to reduce HIV/AIDS incidence and prevalence among urban youth. J Urb Health. 2006;83(3):506–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper AK, Hewitt G, Rifkin S. Chasing the dragon: developing indicators for the assessment of community participation in health programmes. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71:1102–1109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanlerberghe V, Toledo ME, Rodriguez M, Gomez D, Baly A, Van der Stuyft P. Community involvement in dengue control: cluster randomized trial. Brit Med J. 2009;338:b1959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espino F, Beltran M, Carisma B. Malaria control through municipalities in the Philippines: struggling with the mandate of decentralized health programme management. Int J Health Plan Manag. 2004;19:155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horstick O, Runge-Ranzinger S, Nathan MB, Kroeger A. Dengue vector-control services: how do they work? A systematic review and country case studies. Trans Roy Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2010:104:379–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder J, Lloyd LS. Achieving behavioural change for dengue control: methods, scaling-up, and sustainability. UNICEF/UNDP/W B/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases. 2006;8:140–149.
   Google Scholar