Building and analyzing an innovative community-centered dengue-ecosystem management intervention in Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Reference

• Bermejo A, Bekui A (1993) Community participation in disease control. Social Science and Medicine 36, 1145–1150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castle T, Amador M, Rawlins S, Figueroa JP, Reiter P (1999) Absence of impact of aerial malathion treatment on Aedes aegypti during a dengue outbreak in Kingston, Jamaica. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica 5, 100–105.
   Google Scholar
• Draper AK, Hewitt G, Rifkin S (2010) Chasing the dragon: Developing indicators for the assessment of community participation in health programmes. Social Science and Medicine 71, 1102–1109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Focks DA (2004) Areview of entomological sampling methods and indicators for dengue vectors. TDR/IDE/Den/03·1 World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Focks DA, Alexander N. (2006) Multicountry study of Aedes aegypti pupal productivity survey methodology: findings and recommendations. UNICEF/UNDP/WORLD BANK/WHO/Special Programme for research in Tropical Diseases (TDR/IRM/DEN/6·1).
   Google Scholar
• Gionar YR, Rusmiarto S, Susapto D, Bangs MJ (1999) Use of a funnel trap for collecting immature Aedes aegypti and copepods from deep wells in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 15(4), 576–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gryboski K, Yinger NV, Dios RH, Worley H, Fikree FF (2006) Working with the community for improved health. In: Health bulletin 3. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Heintze C, Garrido MV, Kroeger A. 2007. What do community-based control programmes achieve? A systematic review of published evaluations. Trans. Roy. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 101: 317–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yogyakarta City Central Statistics Board (2005) Yogyakarta city in figures 25. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta City BPS.
   Google Scholar
• Kay B, Vu SN (2005) New strategy against Aedes aegypti in Vietnam. Lancet 365, 613–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan M, Manderson L.(1992) Focus Groups in tropical disease research. Health Policy and Planning, 7(1); 56–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy RK, Klugman B (2004) Service accountability and community participation in the context of health sector reforms in Asia: implications for sexual and reproductive health services. Health Policy and Planning 19(issue suppl 1), i78–i86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam VS, Yen NT, Phong TV, Ninh TU, Mai LQ, Lo LV, Nghi LT, Bektas A, Briscombe A, Aaskov JG, Ryan PA, Kay BH. 2005. Elimination of dengue by Community Programs using Mesocyclops (Copepoda) against Aedes Aegypti in Central Vietnam. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2005 72, 67–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan MB, Knudsen AB (1991) Aedes aegypti infestation characteristics in several Carribbean countries and implications for integrated community based control. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 7, 400–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan MB, Focks DA, Kroeger A(2006). Pupal/demographic surveys to inform dengue-vector control. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. 100, Supp.1, S1–S3
   Google Scholar
• Parks WJ, Lloyd LS, Nathan MB, et al.. (2004) International experiences in social mobilization and communication for dengue prevention and control. Dengue Bulletin 28 (suppl).
   Google Scholar
• Parks W, Lloyd I (2004) Planning social mobilization and communication for dengue fever prevention and control. Geneva, World Health Organization (WHO/CDS/WMC/2004·2).
   Google Scholar
• Pluye P, Potvin L, Denis JL, Pelletier J, Mannoni C (2005) Program sustainability begins with the first events. Evaluation and Program Planning 28, 123–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rifkin SB, Lewando-Hundt G, Draper AK (2000) Participatory approaches in health promotion and health planning: A literature review. London: Health Development Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum J, Nathan MB, Ragoonanansingh R, et al.. (1995) Community participation in dengue prevention and control: A survey of knowledge, attitudes and practice in Trinidad and Tobago. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 53, 111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez L, Vanlerberghe V, Alfonso L, et al.. Aedes aegypti larval indices and risk for dengue epidemics. Emerging Infectious Diseases [serial on the Internet] 2006, 12(5), 800–806 (www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol12no05/05-0866.htm).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shediac Rizkalah MC, Bone LR Planning for the sustainability of community based health programs: Conceptual frameworks and future directions for research, practice and policy. Health Education Research 1998, 13, 87–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledo ME, et al.. The unbearable lightness of technocratic efforts at dengue control. Tropical Medicine and International Health 2008, 13(5), 728–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umniyati SR Preliminary investigation on the transovarial transmission of dengue virus in the population of Aedes aegypti in wells. Seminar Peringatan Hari Nyamuk IV di Surabaya, 20–21 August. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization Prevention and control of dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever: comprehensive guidelines. WHO Regional Publication, SEARO, No 29. 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Winch P, Kendall C, Gubler DJ Effectiveness of community participation in vector borne disease control. Health Policy and Planning 1992, 7, 342–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yogyakarta City Central Statistics Board Yogyakarta city in figures 2005. Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta City BPS. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Yogyakarta City Health Office Eco-bio-social aspects of dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF): Presentation of the Sub Office for Disease Mitigation and Prevention (Sub din P2P), Yogyakarta City Health Office, at: Socialization Study of Eco-Bio-Social aspects of Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF), June. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Zakus JD, Lysack CL Revisiting community participation. Health Policy and Planning, 1998, 13(1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar