The Commercialization of Human Eggs in Mitochondrial Replacement Research

References

• American Society of Reproductive Medicine, 2007. Financial Compensation of Oocyte Donors. Fertility and Sterility, 88.2, pp.305–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagheri, A., 2006. Compensated Kidney Exchange: A Review of the Iranian Model. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 16.3, pp.269–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylis, F., 2009. For Love or Money? The Saga of Korean Women who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, New England Journal of Medicine, 30, pp.185–96.
   Google Scholar
• Baylis, F., and C. McLeod, 2007. The Stem Cell Debate Continues: The Buying and Selling of Eggs for Research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, pp.726–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, K., J. Sandor, and S. Schultz, 2011. Oocytes for Research: Between Commercialization and Antipayment Provisions. The Case of Spain and the European Framework. 18 April. Paper presented at the EC REMEDIE project closing conference, Bilbao.
   Google Scholar
• Caulfield, T., T. Scott, I. Hyun, R. Lovell-Badfe, K. Kato, and A. Zarzeczny, 2010. Stem Cell Research Policy and iPS Cells. Nature Methods, 7, pp.28–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crimaldi, L., 2009. Stalled Economy Fertile Ground for Baby Business. Boston Herald, 25 January.
   Google Scholar
• Cyranoski, D., 2004. Korea’s Stem-cell Stars Dogged by Suspicion of Ethical Breach. The Global Body Market: Altruism’s Limits, 429, pp.3.
   Google Scholar
• Daley, G.Q., and J.H. Solbakk, 2011. Stem Cells: Triple Genomes Go Far. Nature, 478, pp.40–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darnovsky, M., 2008. Eggs, Wombs and the Economy: Hard Times Fuel a Buyer’s Market. 8 December. Available at http://www.biopoliticaltimes.org/article.php?id=4427.
   Google Scholar
• Dickenson, D., 2002. Commodification of Human Tissue: Implications for Feminist and Development Ethics. Developing World Bioethics, 2, pp.55–63.
   Google Scholar
• Dickenson, D., 2004. The Threatened Trade in Human Ova. The Global Body Market: Altruism’s Limits, 5.2, pp. 86.
   Google Scholar
• Dickenson, D., 2006. The Lady Vanishes: What’s Missing from the Stem Cell Debate. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 3, pp.43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Dickenson, D., 2009a. Good Science and Good Ethics: Why We Should Discourage Payment for Eggs in Stem Cell Research. The Global Body Market: Altruism’s Limits, 10.11, pp. 743.
   Google Scholar
• Dickenson, D., 2009b. Body Shopping: Converting Body Parts to Profit. Oxford: Oneworld.
   Google Scholar
• Dickenson, D., 2013a. Exploitation and Choice in the Global Egg Trade: Emotive Terminology or Necessary Critique? In Michele Goodwin, ed., Regulating Contestable Commodities in the Global Body Market: Altruism’s Limits. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.21–43.
   Google Scholar
• Dickenson, D., 2013 b. Me Medicine vs. We Medicine: Reclaiming Biotechnology for the Common Good. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickenson, D., and I. Alkorta, 2008. Ova Donation for Research: An International Comparative Perspective. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 1, pp.125–44.
   Google Scholar
• Dodds, S., 2003. Women, Commodification and Stem-cell Research. In J. Humber, and R.F. Almeder, eds., Biomedical Ethics Reviews: Stem Cell Research. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, pp.149–75.
   Google Scholar
• Editorial: High-interest Clones. 2011. Nature, 478, pp. 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egli, D., A.E. Chen, G. Saphier, D. Powers, M. Alper, K. Katz, et al., 2011. Impracticality of Egg Donor Recruitment in the Absence of Compensation. The Global Body Market: Altruism’s Limits, (7 October), 9 (4) pp.293–4.
   Google Scholar
• Empire State Stem Cell Board, 2009. Statement of the Empire State Stem Cell Board on the Compensation of Oocyte Donors. Available at: http://stemcell.ny.gov/docs/esscb-statement-compensation-oocyte-donors.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M.B., ed., 2010. Baby Markets: Money and the New Politics of Creating Families. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heijnen, E., M. Eikemans, and C. de Clerk, et al., 2007. A Mild Treatment Strategy for IVF: A Randomised Non-Inferiority Trial. Lancet, 369, pp.743–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HFEA Statement on Donating Eggs for Research, 21 February 2007. Available at: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/471.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, W.S., et al., 2004. Evidence of a Pluripotent Human Stem Cell Line Derived from a Cloned Blastocyst. Science, 303, pp.1669–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, W.S., 2005. Patient-specific Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human SCNT Blastocysts. Science, 308, pp.1777–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyun, I., 2008. Stem Cells from Skin Cells: The Ethical Questions. Hastings Center Report, 38.1, pp.20–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyun, I., 2011. Moving Human SCNT Research Forward Ethically. Cell Stem Cell, 9.4, pp.295–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyun, I., and P. Tesar, 2011. Stem Cell: Cloning Advance Calls for Careful Regulation. Nature, 478, pp.36–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Society for Stem Cell Research, 2006. Guidelines for the conduct of human embryonic stem cell research. Available at: http://isscr.org/home/publications/guide-clintrans
   Google Scholar
• Jayaprakasan, K., M. Herbert, E. Moody, J. Stewart, and A.P. Murdoch, 2007. Estimating the Risks of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS): Implications for Egg Donation for Research. Human Fertility, 10.3, pp.183–87.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J., 2006. Paying Egg Donors: Exploring the Arguments. Hastings Center Report, 36.1, pp.28–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, W., J. Schneider, and N. Schultz, 2009. US Oocyte Donors: A Retrospective Study of Medical and Psychosocial Issues. Human Reproduction, 24.12, pp.3144–3149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnus, D., and M.K. Cho, 2005. Issues in Oocyte Donation for Stem Cell Research. Science, 308, pp.1747–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K., 1867 (1954). Capital. Trans. Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling, ed. Friedrich Engels. Moscow: Progress.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, C., and F. Baylis, 2006. Feminists on the Inalienability of Human Embryos. Hypatia, 21.1, pp.1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Moazam, F., R. Zaman, and A. Jafarey, 2009. Conversations with Kidney Vendors in Pakistan: An Ethnographic Study. Hastings Center Report, 39.3, pp.29–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noggle, S., H.L. Fung, A. Gore, H. Martinez, K.C. Satriani, R. Prosser, K. Oum, et al, 2011. Human Oocytes Reprogram Somatic Cells to a Pluripotent State. Nature, 478, pp.70–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norsigian, J., 2005. Egg Donation for IVF and Stem Cell Research: Time to Weigh the Risks to Women’s Health. Available at: http://www.ourbodiesourselves/orgbook/companionasp?id=3197&page=2.
   Google Scholar
• Paik, Y.G., 2006. Beyond Bioethics: The Globalized Reality of Ova Trafficking and the Possibility of Feminist Intervention. Paper presented at the International Forum on the Human Rights of Women and Biotechnology, Seoul, 21 September.
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, C., 1988. The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pauli, D., V. Emmanuele, K.N. Weiss, N. Treff, L. Stewart, H. Hua, et al., 2012. Nuclear Genome Transfer in Human Oocytes Eliminates Mitochondrial DNA Variants. Nature, 19 December. doi:10.1038/nature11800.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J., 2009. New York: OK to Pay for Eggs for Stem Cell Research. Biopolitical Times, 19 June. Available at: http://www.biopoliticaltimes.org/article.php?id=4684.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, A., 1987. Exploitation. In David Miller et al., eds., The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought, Oxford: Blackwell, pp.143–44.
   Google Scholar
• Sample, I., 2013. Three-person IVF: government backs mitochondrial transfer. Guardian, 28 June. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/jun/28/uk-government-ivf-dna-three-people.
   Google Scholar
• Schepher-Hughes, N., and Tober, D., 2013. Risks are many in paying women to donate eggs. Sacramento Bee, 16 July. Available at: http://www.sacbee.com/2013/07/16/5568944/risks-are-many-in-paying-women.html#storylink=cpy.
   Google Scholar
• Shanks, P., 2011. A Campaign to Allow a Market in Women’s Eggs for a New Kind of Cloning Research. Biopolitical Times, 7 October. Available at: http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5882.
   Google Scholar
• Shanks, P., 2012. A New Push for Human Cloning in Korea. Biopolitical Times, 20 January. Available at: http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=6038.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, N., S. Bollini, K.N. Dubé, J.M. Vieira, B. Zhou, S. Davidson, D. Yellon, et al., 2011. De Novo Cardiomycytes from within the Activated Adult Heart after Injury. Nature, 474, pp.640–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spar, D., 2006. The Baby Business: How Money, Science, and Politics Drive the Commerce of Conception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spar, D., 2007. The Egg Trade: Making Sense of the Market for Human Oocytes. NEJM, 356.13, pp.1289–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbock, B., 2004. Payment for Egg Donation and Surrogacy. Mt Sinai Journal of Medicine, 71.4, pp.55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Tachibana, M., P. Amato, M. Sparman, J. Woodward, D.M. Sanchis, H. Ma, et al, 2012. Towards Germline Gene Therapy of Inherited Mitochondrial Diseases. Nature, 493, pp.627–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, K., K. Tanabe, M. Ohnuki, M. Narita, T. Ichisaka, K. Tomoda, and S. Yamanaka, 2007. Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors. Cell, 131.5, pp.861–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, N., 2011. After Setbacks in Harvesting Stem Cells, a New Approach Shows Promise. New York Times, 5 October. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/06/science/06stem.html.
   Google Scholar
• Waldby, C., 2008. Oocyte Markets: Women’s Reproductive Work in Embryonic Stem Cell Research. New Genetics and Society, 27.1: pp.19–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldby, C., and K. Carroll, 2012. Egg Donation for Stem Cell Research: Ideas of Surplus and Deficit in Australian IVF Patients’ and Reproductive Donors’ Accounts. Sociology of Health and Illness, 34.4, pp.513–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldby, C., and M. Cooper, 2010. From Reproductive Work to Regenerative Labour: The Female Body and the Stem Cell Industries. Feminist Theory, 11.1, pp.3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S., R. Jimenez, and J.W. Lee, 2009. Dramatic Changes in Stem Cell Funding by the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (CIRM): Implications for the Future of Stem Cell Research. Poster presented at the seventh annual convention of the International Society for Stem Cell Research, Barcelona, 10 July.
   Google Scholar