Translating and validating a Mandarin Chinese version of the computerized revised token test

References

• Brookshire R.H., Nicholas L.E. 1984. Consistency of effects of slow rate and pauses on aphasic listeners' comprehension of spoken sentences. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 27(3): 323–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan A.H.S., Lee P.S.K. 2005. Intelligibility and preferred rate of Chinese speaking. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35(3): 217–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung Y.-M., Li S.-E., Chang M.-H. 2003. Concise Chinese Aphasia Test [In Chinese]. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychological Publishing Co., Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• DeRenzi E.V., Vignolo L.A. 1962. The Token Test: a sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasic. Brain, 85: 665–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle P.J., McNeil M.R., Hula W.D., Mikolic J. 2003. The Burden of Stroke Scale BOSS: Validating patient-reported communication difficulty and associated psychological distress in stroke survivors. Aphasiology, 17(3): 291–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberwein C.A., Pratt S.R., McNeil M.R., Fossett T.R.D., Szuminsky N.J., Doyle P.J. 2007. Auditory performance characteristics of the Computerized Revised Token Test (CRTT). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4): 865–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallardo G.G., Guardia J.G., Villasenor T.V., McNeil M.R. 2011. Psychometric data for the Revised Token Test in normally developing Mexican children ages 4–12 years. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(3): 225–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass H., Kaplan E. 1983. Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Heilman L.E. 2008. An Examination of the Effects of Mode of Access on the Computerized Revised Token Test. (Master's thesis, University of Pittsburgh). Available from: http://etd.library.pitt.edu/ETD/available/etd-07222008-151505/.
   Google Scholar
• Heilman L.E., McNeil M.R., Pratt S.R., Hill K. An examination of the effects of mode of access on the Computerized Revised Token Test. Paper presented to the 2nd annual Clinical Augmentative, Alternative Communication Conference, Charlottesville, Virginia, September, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson M.G., Porch B.E. 1968. The differential effects of unilateral versus bilateral cerebral lesions on performances involving comparable visual and auditory tasks. Paper presented at the American Speech and Hearing Association Annual Convention, Denver, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz A. 1982. The Western Aphasia Battery. London: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Kimelman M.D.Z. 1991. The role of target word stress in auditory comprehension by aphasic listeners. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 34(2): 334–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimelman M.D.Z. 1999. Prosody, linguistic demands, and auditory comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language, 69(2): 212–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimelman M.D.Z., McNeil M.R. 1987. An investigation of emphatic stress comprehension in adult aphasia: a replication. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 30(3): 295–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimelman M.D.Z., McNeil M.R. 1988. Contextual influences on the auditory comprehension of normally stressed targets by aphasic listeners. Paper presented at the 18th Clinical Aphasiology Conference, Cape Cod, MA. Abstract available from: http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/archive/00000088/.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil M.R., Brauer D., Pratt S.R. 1990. A test of auditory language processing regression: adult aphasia versus normal children ages 5–13 years. Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders, 18: 21–39.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil M.R., Pratt S.R., Szuminsky N.J., Sung J.E., Fossett T.R.D., Kim A., Fassbinder W. 2013, in submission. Description and psychometric development of the Computerized Revised Token Test (CRTT): Test-retest reliability, concurrent and construct validity with comparison to three experimental reading versions (CRTT-R) in normal adults and persons with aphasia.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil M.R., Kim A., Sung J.E., Pratt S.R., Szuminsky N., Doyle P.J. 2009. Comparison of left versus right hand, and mouse versus touchscreen access methods on the Computerized Revised Token Test. Paper presented at the 39th Clinical Aphasiology Conference, Keystone, CO. Abstract available from: http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/archive/00002085/.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil M.R., Pratt S.R., Sung J., Szuminsky N.J., Ventura M., Kim A., et al. 2008. Test-retest reliability of the auditory Computerized Revised Token Test (CRTT) and three experimental reading CRTT-R versions in normal elderly individuals and persons with aphasia. Paper presented at the 38th Clinical Aphasiology Conference, Jackson Hole, WY. Abstract available from: http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/archive/00001947/.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil M.R. 1982. The nature of aphasia in adults. In: , Lass N.J., McReynolds L., Northern F., Yoder D. (eds.) Speech Language and Hearing. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; Vol. II, pp. 692–740.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil M.R., Dionigi C.M., Langlois A., Prescott T.E. 1989. A measure of Revised Token Test ordinality and intervality. Aphasiology, 3(1): 31–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil M.R., Pratt S.R. 2001. Defining aphasia: some theoretical and clinical implications of operating from a formal definition. Aphasiology, 15(10–11): 901–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil M.R., Prescott T.E. 1978. Revised Token Test: University Baltimore. MD: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas L.E., Brookshire R.H. 1986. Consistency of the effects of rate of speech on brain-damaged adults' comprehension of narrative discourse. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 29(4): 462–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odekar A., Hallowell B. 2005. Comparison of alternatives to multidimensional scoring in the assessment of language comprehension in aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14(4): 337–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashek G.V., Brookshire R.H. 1982. Effects of rate of speech and linguistic stress on auditory paragraph comprehension of aphasic individuals. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 25(3): 377–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porch B.E. 1971. Porch Index of Communicative Ability. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porch B.E. 2007. Comments on ‘Comparison of alternatives to multidimensional scoring in the assessment of language comprehension in aphasia’ by Odekar and Hallowell (2005). American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(1): 84–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiavetti N., Metz D.E. 2006. Evaluating Research in Communicative Disorders (5 ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Sperber A.D., Devellis R.F., Boehlecke B. 1994. Cross-cultural translation: methodology and validation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25(4): 501–524. doi:10.1177/0022022194254006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Research, Development and Evaluation Commission (RDEC) of the Executive Yuan, Taiwan. 2009. 98 (Digital Divide in Taiwan 2009) [In Chinese] [2012 July 09]. Available from: http://www.rdec.gov.tw/public/Attachment/91215101202.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng C.-Y., Su Z.-Y. 2007. [One Base Form of Discourse Prosody Goes a Long Way– Evidence of Style Dependent Contribution and Possible Application to Technology Development] [In Chinese]. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Computational Linguistics and Speech Processing, Taipei, Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan J., Liberman M., Cieri C. 2006. Towards an integrated understanding of speaking rate in conversation. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing.
   Google Scholar