Staff perceptions following the introduction of a fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing service for patients following stroke

References

• Anderson J.R. 1982. Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89(4): 369–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aviv J.E. 2000. Prospective, randomized outcome study of endoscopy versus modified barium swallow in patients with dysphagia. The Laryngoscope, 110(4): 563–574. doi:10.1097/00005537-200004000-00008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aviv J.E., Sataloff R.T., Cohen M., Spitzer J., Ma G., Bhayani R., et al. 2001. Cost-effectiveness of two types of dysphagia care in head and neck cancer: a preliminary report. Ear, Nose & Throat Journal, 80(8): 553–558.
   Google Scholar
• Bastian R.W. 1993. The videoendoscopic swallowing study: an alternative and partner to the videofluoroscopic swallowing study. Dysphagia, 8(4): 359–367. doi:10.1007/bf01321780.
   Google Scholar
• Bax L., McFarlane M., Green E., Miles A. (2014). Speech-Language Pathologist-led FEES: functional outcomes for patients after stroke. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, 23(3): e195–e200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bercovitz J., Feldman M. 2008. Academic entrepreneurs: organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19(1): 69–89. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain M., Mittman R. 2002. Diffusion of innovation in healthcare. California: Institute for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter J., Dickinson H. 2008. Interprofessional education and training. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cichero J. 2006. Clinical assessment: cervical auscultation and pulse oximetry. In: Cichero J., Murdoch B. (eds.), Dysphagia: foundation, theory and practice. West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 149–190.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen M.A., Setzen M., Perlman P.W., Ditkoff M., Mattucci K.F., Guss J. 2003. The safety of flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing in an outpatient otolaryngology setting. The Laryngoscope, 113: 21–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colodny N. 2001. Construction and validation of the mealtime and dysphagia questionnaire: an instrument designed to assess nursing staff reasons for noncompliance with SLP dysphagia and feeding recommendations. Dysphagia, 16(4): 263–271. doi:10.1007/s00455-001-0085-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colodny N. 2002. Interjudge and intrajudge reliabilities in fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (Fees®) using the penetration-aspiration scale: a replication study. Dysphagia, 17(4): 308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziewas R., Warnecke T., Ölenberg S., Teismann I., Zimmermann J., Krämer C., et al. 2008. Towards a basic endoscopic assessment of swallowing in acute stroke – development and evaluation of a simple dysphagia score. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 26(1): 41–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans A., Perez I., Harraf F., Melbourn A., Steadman J., Donaldson N., et al. 2001. Can differences in management processes explain different outcomes between stroke unit and stroke-team care? The Lancet, 358(9293): 1586–1592. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06652-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgi A. 1997. The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 28(2): 235–260. doi:10.1163/156916297×00103.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim U.H., Lundman B. 2004. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24: 105–112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant B.M., Giddings L.S. 2002. Making sense of methodologies: a paradigm framework for the novice researcher. Contemporary Nurse, 13: 10–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green L., Siefert C. 2005. Translation of research into practice: why we can't ‘just do it’. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 18: 541–545.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly A.M., Drinnan M.J., Leslie P. 2007a. Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare? The Laryngoscope, 117: 1723–1727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly A.M., Hydes K., McLaughlin C., Wallace S. 2007b. Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES): the role of speech and language therapy (RCSLT Policy Statement). London: Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly A.M., Leslie P., Beale T., Payten C., Drinnan M.J. 2006. Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and videofluoroscopy: does examination type influence perception of pharyngeal residue severity? Clinical Otolaryngology, 31: 425–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langmore S.E. 2003. Evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia: which diagnostic tool is superior? Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 11: 485–489.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langmore S.E., Schatz K., Olson N. 1988. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing safety: a new procedure. Dysphagia, 2: 216–219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langmore S.E., Schatz K., Olson N. 1991. Endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing and aspiration. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 100: 678–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leder S.B. 1998. Serial fiberoptic endoscopic swallowing evaluations in the management of patients with dysphagia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79: 1264–1269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leder S.B., Cohn S.M., Moller B.A. 1998. Fiberoptic endoscopic documentation of the high incidence of aspiration following extubation in critically ill trauma patients. Dysphagia, 13: 208–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leder S.B., Espinosa J.F. 2002. Aspiration risk after acute stroke: comparison of clinical examination and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Dysphagia, 17(3): 214–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logemann J.A. 1998. Evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. 2nd ed. Austin: PRO-ED Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Logemann J.A., Rademaker A.W., Pauloski B.R., Ohmae Y., Kahrilas P.J. 1998. Normal swallowing physiology as viewed by videofluoroscopy and videoendoscopy. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 50(6): 311–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi N.M., Riley R.T. 2000. Managing change: an overview. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 7(2): 116–124. doi:10.1136/jamia.2000.0070116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martino R., Foley N., Bhogal S., Diamant N., Speechley M., Teasell R. 2005. Dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke, 36(12): 2756–2763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martino R., Pron G., Diamant N.E. 2004. Oropharyngeal dysphagia: surveying practice patterns of the speech–language pathologist. Dysphagia, 19(3): 165–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles A., Zeng I.S.L., McLauchlan H., Huckabee M.-L. 2013. Cough reflex testing in dysphagia following stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, 5(3): 222–233. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/jocmr1340w.
   Google Scholar
• O'Reilly P. 1993. Barriers to effective clinical decision making in nursing. Nursing Monogram. Available from: http://www.clininfo.health.nsw.gov.au/hospolic/stvincents/1993/a04.html.
   Google Scholar
• QSR International Pty Ltd. 2010. NVivo 9 qualitative data analysis software (Version 10).
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey D.J.C., Smithard D.G., Kalra L. 2003. Early assessments of dysphagia and aspiration risk in acute stroke patients. Stroke, 34: 1252–1257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redfern S., Christian S. 2003. Achieving change in healthcare practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 9(2): 225–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smithard D.G., Smeeton N.C., Wolfe C.D. 2007. Long-term outcome after stroke: does dysphagia matter? Age Ageing, 36(1): 90–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Tamaray M., Wilson L., McAllister L. 2011. Factors affecting dysphagia management and compliance with recommendations in non-metropolitan healthcare settings. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(3): 268–279. doi:10.3109/17549507.2011.573575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. 2007. Organized inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4(4): 1–72. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000197.pub2.
   Google Scholar
• Suiter D.M., Leder S.B. 2008. Clinical utility of the 3-ounce water swallow test. Dysphagia, 23: 244–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnecke T., Dziewas R., Oelenberg S., Ritter M., Dittrich R., Schabitz W.-R., et al. 2006. Serial fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in patients with acute stroke and dysphagia: case report and general considerations. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 15(4): 172–175. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2006.05.001.
   Google Scholar
• Warnecke T., Ritter M., Kroger B., Oelenberg S., Teismann I., Heuschmann P., et al. 2009a. Fibreoptic endoscopic dysphagia severity scale predicts outcome after stroke. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 28: 283–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnecke T., Ritter M.A., Kröger B., Oelenberg S., Teismann I., Heuschmann P.U., et al. 2009b. Fiberoptic endoscopic dysphagia severity scale predicts outcome after acute stroke. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 28(3): 283–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnecke T., Teismann I., Oelenberg S., Hamacher C., Ringelstein E.B., Schäbitz W.R., et al. 2009c. The safety of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in acute stroke patients. Stroke, 40(2): 482–486. doi:10.1161/strokeaha.108.520775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C.H., Hsiao T.Y., Chen J.C., Chang Y.C., Lee S.Y. 1997. Evaluation of swallowing safety with fiberoptic endoscope: comparison with videofluoroscopic technique. The Laryngoscope, 107(3): 396–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar