Intra-subject variability in the auditory brainstem response using a vertical montage recording

References

• Beattie R.C., Beguwala F.E., Mills D.M., Boyd R.L. 1986. Latency and amplitude effects of electrode placement on the early auditory evoked response. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorder, 51: 63–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beattie R.C., Zipp J.A., Schaffer C.A., Silzel K.L. 1992. Effects of sample size on the latency and amplitude of the auditory evoked response. American Journal of Otology, 13: 55–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bolajoko O. 2010. Ambient noise levels and infant hearing screening programs in developing countries: an observational report. International Journal of Audiology, 49: 535–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolajoko O., Shiela L.W., Linda M.L. 2008. Factors associated with auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony in a developing country. Audiological Medicine, 6: 120–128.
   Google Scholar
• Chiappa K.H., Karen J., Robert R. 1979. Brain stem auditory evoked responses studies of waveform variation in 50 normal human subjects. Archives of Neurology, 36: 81–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Don M., Elberling C., Waring M. 1984. Objective detection of averaged auditory brainstem response. Scandinavian Audiology, 13: 219–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzulkarnain A.A., Abdul Hadi U.S., Zakaria N.A. 2013. The effects of stimulus rate and electrode montage on the auditory brainstem response in infants. Speech, Language and Hearing, 16: 221–226.
   Google Scholar
• Dzulkarnain A.A., Wilson W.J., Bradley A.P., Petoe M. 2008. The effects of electrode montage on the amplitude of Wave V in the auditory brainstem response to maximum length sequence stimuli. Audiology and Neurotology, 13: 7–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards R.M., Buchwald J.S., Tanguay P.E., Schwafel J.A. 1982. Sources of variability in auditory brain stem evoked potential measures over time. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 53: 125–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elberling C., Don M. 2007. Detecting and assessing synchronous neural activity in the temporal domain (SNR and response detection). In: Burkard R., Don M., Eggermont J.J. eds. Auditory evoked potentials: basic principles and clinical applications. Baltimore: Lippincott, Willimas & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Hall J.W. 1992. Handbook of auditory evoked response. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Hall J.W. 2007. New handbook of auditory evoked responses. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Jewett D., Romano M., Williston J. 1970. Human auditory evoked potentials: possible brainstem components detected on the scalp. Science, 167: 1517–1518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katbamna B., Bennet S.L., Dokler P.A., Metz D.A. 1995. Effect of electrode montage on infant auditory brainstem response. Scandinavian Audiology, 24 :133–136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katbamna B., Metz D.A., Bennett S.L., Dokler P.A. 1996. Effects of electrode montage on the spectral composition of the infant auditory brainstem response. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 7: 269–273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King A.J., Sininger Y.S. 1992. Electrode configuration for auditory brainstem response audiometry. American Journal of Audiology, 1: 63–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lasky R.E., Rupert A., Waller M. 1987. Reproducibility of auditory brain-stem evoked responses as a function of the stimulus, scorer and subject. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 68: 45–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lauter J.L., Karzon R.G. 1990a. Individual differences in auditory electric responses. III. A replication, with observations of individual vs. group characteristics. Scandinavian Audiology, 19: 67–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauter J.L., Karzon R.G. 1990b. Individual differences in auditory electric responses: comparisons of between-subject and within-subject variability. IV. Latency-variability comparisons in early, middle and late responses. Scandinavian Audiology, 19: 175–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauter J.L., Karzon R.G. 1990c. Individual differences in auditory electric responses: comparisons of between-subject and within-subject variability. V. Amplitude-variability comparisons in early, middle and late responses. Scandinavian Audiology, 19: 201–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauter J.L., Loomis R.L. 1986. Individual differences in auditory electric responses: comparisons of between-subject and within-subject variability. I. Absolute latencies of brainstem vertex-positive peaks. Scandinavian Audiology, 15: 167–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauter J.L., Loomis R.L. 1988. Individual differences in auditory electric responses: comparisons of between-subject and within-subject variability. II. Amplitude of brainstem vertex-positive peaks. Scandinavian Audiology, 17: 87–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore J. 1987a. The human auditory brain stem as a generator of auditory evoked potential. Hearing Research., 29: 33–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore J.K. 1987b. The human auditory brain stem: a comparative view. Hearing Research, 29: 1–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyler R.F., Lauter J.L., Matkin N.D. 1991. Intra-subject variability in the absolute latency of the auditory brainstem response. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2: 206–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parker J.D. 1981. Dependence of the auditory brainstem response on electrode location. Archives of Otolaryngology, 107: 367–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pethe J., Muhler R., von Specht H. 1998. Influence of electrode position on the near threshold recording of auditory brainstem potentials. Scandinavian Audiology, 27: 77–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenhammer H.J., Lindstrom B., Lundborg T. 1978. On the use of click-evoked electric brainstem responses in audiological diagnosis I: the variability of the normal response. Scandinavian Audiology, 7: 193–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rouev P., Mumdzhiev H., Spiridonova J., Dimov P. 2004. Universal newborn hearing screening program in Bulgaria. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 68: 805–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe M.J. 1978. Normal variability of the brain-stem auditory-evoked response in young and old adult subjects. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 44: 459–470.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sininger Y.S., Cone-Wesson B., Folsom R.C., Gorga M.P., Vohr B.R., Widen J.E., Ekelid M., Norton S.J. 2000. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: auditory brain stem responses in the perinatal period. Ear and Hearing, 21: 383–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sininger Y.S., Don M. 1989. Effects of click rate and electrode orientation on the threshold of the auditory brainstem response. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32: 880–886.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stevens J., Brennan S., Gratton D., Campbell M. 2013. ABR in newborns: effects of electrode configuration, stimulus rate and EEG rejection levels on test efficiency. International Journal of Audiology, 52: 706–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart A., Yang E.Y., Botea M. 1996. Neonatal auditory brainstem responses recorded from four electrode montages. Journal of Communication Disorders, 29: 125–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagi N., Suzuki T., Kobayashi K. 1985. Effect of tone-burst frequency on fast and slow components of auditory brain-stem response. Scandinavian Audiology, 14: 75–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tusa R.J., Stewart W.F., Shechter A.L., Simon D., Liberman J.N. 1994. Longitudinal study of brainstem auditory evoked responses in 87 normal human subjects. Neurology, 44: 528–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• vd Drift J.F., Brocaar M.P., Von Zanten G.A., Lamore P.J. 1988. Inaccuracies in the measurement of auditory brainstem response data in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. Audiology, 27: 109–118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson W.J. 2004. The relationship between the auditory brain-stem response and its reconstructed waveforms following discrete wavelet transformation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115: 1129–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang E.Y., Stuart A., Stenstrom R., Green W.B. 1993. Test-retest variability of the auditory brainstem response to bone-conducted clicks in newborn infants. Audiology, 32: 89–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar