References
- Aldrich, R. M. (2011). A review and critique of well-being in occupational therapy and occupational science. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 18, 93–100.
- American Occupational Therapy Association (2014). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (3rd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68, S1–S51.
- Doble, S. E., & Santha, J. C. (2008). Occupational well-being: Rethinking occupational therapy outcomes. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(3), 184–190.
- Hayward, C., & Taylor, J. (2011). Eudaimonic well-being: Its importance and relevance to occupational therapy for humanity. Occupational Therapy International, 18(3), 133–41.
- Kimiecik, J. (2011). Exploring the promise of eudaimonic well-being within the practice of health promotion: The ‘How’ is as important as the ‘what’. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(5), 769–792.
- McLaughlin, S., Jette, A., & Connell, C. (2012) An examination of healthy aging across a conceptual continuum: Prevalence estimates, demographic patterns, and validity. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 67(7), 783–789.
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Social Sciences, 52, 141–166.
- Steptoe, A., Deaton, A., & Stone, A. (2014). Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing. The Lancet, 385, 640–648.
- Waterman, A., Schwartz, S., & Conti, R. (2008). The implications of two conceptions of happiness (hedonic and enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Happiness, Studies, 9, 41–79.
- Waterman, A., Schwartz, S., Zamboanga, B., Ravert, R., Williams, M., Agocha, V., … Donnellan, M. (2010). The questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 41–61.