The historical shift towards human rights in occupational therapy with special reference to the Capabilities Approach and its implications

References

• Alkire, S. (2002). Valuing freedoms: Sen's capability approach and poverty reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batavia, A. I., De Jong, G., & McKnew, L. B. (1991). Toward a national personal assistance program: The independent living model of long-term care for persons with disabilities. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 16(3), 523–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickenbach, J. E. (1993). Physical disability and social policy. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bickenbach, J. E. (2003). Disability and equality. University of Toronto Journal of Law & Equality, 2(1), 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Braddock, D., Parish, S. L. (2001). An institutional history of disability. In G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 11–68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Galvin, D., Wilding, C., & Whiteford, G. (2011). Utopian visions/dystopian realities: Exploring practice and taking action to enable human rights and occupational justice in a hospital context. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 58(5), 378–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasper, D., & Van Staveren, I. (2003). Development as freedom — And as what else? Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 137–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. W. (2008). Reflections on… well-being and occupational rights. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(1), 61–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herr, S., Gostin, L., & Koh, H. (Eds.). (2005). The human rights of persons with intellectual disabilities: Different but equal. London/New York: Rutledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. (2002). Disability and the body. In C. Barnes, M. Oliver, & L. Barton (Eds.), Disability studies today. Oxford: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Liachowitz, C. H. (1988). Disability as a social construct: Legislative roots. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Lysack, C., & Kaufert, J. (1994). Comparing the origins and ideologies of the independent living movement and community based-rehabilitation. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 17(3), 231–240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maller, C., Townsend, A., Pryor, P., Brown, P., & St Leger, L. (2006). Healthy nature healthy people: Contact with nature as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promotion International, 21, 45–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, D. (1997). Review models of disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 19(3), 85–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl, M. A., & Bickenbach, J. (1998). Introduction to disability. London/Philadelphia: Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• McColl, M. A., Gerein, N., & Valentine, F. (1997). Meeting the challenges of disability: Models for enabling function and well-being. In C. Christiansen, & C. Baum (Eds.), Occupational therapy: Performance, participation, and well-being. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, S., & Williamson, L. (2007). Impairment and disability: Law and ethics at the beginning and end of life. London: Rutledge-Cavendish.
   Google Scholar
• Mousavi, T., Dharamsi, S., Forwell, S., & Dean, E. (2015a). Occupational therapists’ perceived relevance of Nussbaum's central capabilities to client-centered practice. The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 3(4), article 5.
   Google Scholar
• Mousavi, T., Forwell, S., Dharamsi, S., & Dean, E. (2015b). Occupational therapists’ views of Nussbaum's practical reason and affiliation capabilities. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 31(1), 1–18. doi: i10.1080/0164212X.2014.1003265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi, T., Forwell, S., Dharamsi, S., & Dean, E. (2015c). Conceptualizing occupation using the capabilities approach. New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(1), 20, 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (1990). The individual and social models of disability. The Disability Studies Archive. Retrieved on August 9, 2015 from http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/Oliver-in-soc-dis.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (1999). Disabled people and the inclusive society: Or the times they really are changing. Independent Living Organisation. Retrieved on August 9, 2015 from http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/Oliver-SOCEX.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, N., Alsop, A., & Kronenberg, F. (2005). Reconceptualising occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(11), 524–526.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1972). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2006). The capability approach in practice. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3), 351–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (1980). Equality of what? In S. M. McMurrin (Ed.), The Tanner lectures on human values 1980. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (2004). Capabilities, lists and public reason: Continuing the conversation. Feminist Economics, 10(3), 77–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 151–166.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability rights and wrongs. London/New York: Rutledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T., & Watson, N. (2001). The social model of disability: an outdated ideology source. Research in Social Science and Disability, 2(1), 9–28.
   Google Scholar
• Shuttleworth, R. P., & Kasnitz, D. (2006). In Gary L. Albrecht (Ed.), Encyclopedia of disability (pp. 330–335). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, E., & Wilcock, A. A. (2004). Occupational justice and client-centred practice: A dialogue in progress. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(2), 75–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• United Nations (1993). General assembly resolution 48/96 of 20 December 1993. Retrieved August 6, 2015 from http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/48/a48r096.htm.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (2007). Handbook for parliamentarians on the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and its optional protocol. Geneva: United Nations. Retrieved on August 9, 2015 from http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/toolaction/ipuhb.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations & The World Health Organization (2008). The right to health. Fact Sheet No. 31. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Palais des Nations, 8–14 avenue de la Paix, CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland and to WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 avenue Appia, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland. Retrieved on August 9, 2015 from http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/Factsheet31.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. A. (2006). An occupational perspective of health (2nd ed.). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. A., & Townsend, E. (2000). Occupational justice. Occupational therapy interactive dialogue. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 7(2), 84–86.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G. (2001). Theorizing disability. In G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 123–144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• World Federation of Occupational Therapists (2006). World federation of occupational therapists position statement on human rights. Australia: WFOT.
   Google Scholar