Publication Cover
CRANIO®
The Journal of Craniomandibular & Sleep Practice
Volume 33, 2015 - Issue 2
216
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
TMJ

Effect of the dental arches morphology on the masticatory muscles activities in normal occlusion young adults

, , , , &

References

  • Ash MM, Nelson SJ. Dental anatomy, physiology and occlusion. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2003. p. 430, 437–9.
  • Tartaglia GM, Testori T, Pallavera A, Marelli B, Sforza C. Electromyographic analysis of masticatory and neck muscles in subjects with natural dentition, teeth-supported and implant-supported prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:1081–8.
  • Bakke M. Mandibular elevator muscles: physiology, action, and effect of dental occlusion. Scand J Dent Res. 1993;101:314–31.
  • Davies S, Gray RM. What is occlusion? Br Dent J. 2001;191:235–45.
  • Okeson JP. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. 5th ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 2003. p. 109–26.
  • Zarb G. The interface of occlusion revisited. Int J Prosthodont. 2005;18:270–1.
  • McCoy G. Occlusion confusion. Gen Dent. 2013;61:69–75.
  • Türp JC, Schindler H. The dental occlusion as a suspected cause for TMDs: epidemiological and etiological considerations. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39:502–12.
  • Farella M, Bakke M, Michelotti A, Rapuano A, Martina R. Masseter thickness, endurance and exercise-induced pain in subjects with different vertical craniofacial morphology. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003;111:183–8.
  • Garcia-Morales P, Buschang PH, Throckmorton GS, English JD. Maximum bite force, muscle efficiency and mechanical advantage in children with vertical growth patterns. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25:265–72.
  • Ferrario VF, Tartaglia GM, Galletta A, Grassi GP, Sforza C. The influence of occlusion on jaw and neck muscle activity: a surface EMG study in healthy young adults. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33:341–8.
  • Helsinki Declaration, ICH guideline for good clinical practice. In: Proceedings of the 59th WMA General Assembly: 1–8; October 2008; Seoul, Korea. WMA: Ferney-Voltaire, France.
  • Kerstein RB. Combining technologies: a computerized occlusal analysis system synchronized with a computerized electromyography system. J Craniomandib Pract. 2004;22:96–109.
  • Eroz UB, Ceylan I, Aydemir S. An investigation of mandibular morphology in subjects with different vertical facial growth patterns. Aust Orthod J. 2000;16:16–22.
  • Forster CM, Sunga E, Chung CH. Relationship between dental arch width and vertical facial morphology in untreated adults. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30:288–94.
  • Heikinheimo K, Nyström M, Heikinheimo T, Pirttiniemi P, Pirinen S. Dental arch width, overbite, and overjet in a Finnish population with normal occlusion between the ages of 7 and 32 years. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34:418–26.
  • Tibana RH, Palagi LM, Miguel JA. Changes in dental arch measurements of young adults with normal occlusion- a longitudinal study. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:618–23.
  • Wang XR, Zhang Y, Xing N, Xu YF, Wang MQ. Stable tooth contacts in intercuspal occlusion makes for utilities of the jaw elevators during maximal voluntary clenching. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40:319–28.
  • Kerstein RB, Radke J. Masseter and temporalis excursive hyperactivity decreased by measured anterior guidance development. J Craniomandib Pract. 2012;30:243–54.
  • Saifuddin M, Miyamoto K, Ueda HM, Shikata N, Tanne K. A quantitative electromyographic analysis of masticatory muscle activity in usual daily life. Oral Dis. 2001;7:94–100.
  • Ingervall B, Helkimo E. Masticatory muscle force and facial morphology in man. Arch Oral Biol. 1978;23:203–6.
  • Proctor AD, de Vicenzo JP. Masseter muscle position relative to dentofacial form. Angle Orthodontist. 1970,40:37–45.
  • Weijs WA, Hillen B. Correlations between the cross-sectional area of the jaw muscles and craniofacial size and shape. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1986;70:423–31.
  • Watanabe K, Watanabe M. Activity of jaw-opening and jaw-closing muscles and their influence on dentofacial morphological features in normal adults. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28:873–9.
  • Ringqvist M. Isometric bite force and its relation to dimensions of the facial skeleton. Acta Odontologica Scand. 1973;31:35–42.
  • Thongudomporn U, Chongsuvivatwong V, Geater AF. The effect of maximum bite force on alveolar bone morphology. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2009;12:1–8.
  • Watanabe K. The relationship between dentofacial morphology and the isometric jaw-opening and closing muscle function as evaluated by electromyography. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27:639–45.
  • Forrester SE, Presswood RG, Toy AC, Pain MT. Occlusal measurement method can affect SEMG activity during occlusion. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38:655–60.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.