CONTINUOUS INTRA-ABDOMINAL PRESSURE MONITORING

REFERENCES

• Ivatury RR, Porter JM, Simon RJ, et al Intra-abdominal hypertension after life-threatening penetrating abdominal trauma: prophylaxis, incidence, and clinical relevance of gastric mucosal pH and abdominal compartment syndrome. J Trauma. 1998.44: 1016–1023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balogh Z, McKinley BA, Holcomb JB, et al: Both primary and secondary abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) can be predicted early and are harbingers of muftiple organ failure. J Trauma. 2003; 54:848–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raeburn CD, Moore EE, Biffl WL, et al The abdominal compart-ment syndrome is a morbid complication of postinjury damage control surgery. Am J Surg. 2001; 182: 542–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malbrain ML, Cheatham ML, Kirkpatrick A, et al Results from the I nternational Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hyper-tension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. I. Definitions. Intensive Care Med. 2006; 32: 1722–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kron IL, Harman PK, Nolan SP. The measurement of intra-ab-dominal pressure as a criterion for exploration. Ann Surg. 1984; 199: 28–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obeid F, Fath J, Guslit B, et al Increases in intra-abdominal pres-sure affect pulmonary compliance. Arch Surg. 1995; 130: 544–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugrue M, Buist MD, Lee A, et al Intra-abdominal pressure meas-urement using a modified nasogastric tube: description and validation of a new technique. Int Care Med. 1994; 20: 588–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore FA, Cocanour CS, McKinley BA, et al: Migrating motility complexes persist after severe traumatic shock in patients who tolerate enteral nutrition. J Trauma. 2001; 51: 1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malbrain ML. Different techniques to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP): time for a critical re-appraisal Intensive Care Med. 2004; 30:357–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De WaeEe JJ, Billiet EA, Hoste E, Blot SI, Colardyn FA. Fluid vs. air for semicontinuous intra-abdominal pressure measurements using a compliance catheter. Intensive Care Med. 2005; 31:598–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balogh Z, Jones F, D'Amours S, Parr M, Sugrue M. Continuous intra-abdominal pressure measurement technique. Am Surg. 2004; 188: 679–84.
   Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agree-ment between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1:307–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks AJ, Simpson A, DeLbridge M, Beckingham IJ, Girling KJ. Validation of direct intraabdominal pressure measurement using a continuous indwelling compartment pressure monitor. J Trauma. 2005; 58:830–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risin E, Kessel B, Ashkenazi I, Lieberman N, Alfici R. A new technique of direct intra-abdominal pressure measurement: a pre-liminary study. Am J Surg. 2006; 191: 235–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis PJ, Koottayi S, Taylor A, Butt WW. Comparison of indirect methods of measuring intra-abdominal pressure in children. Intensive Care Med. 2005; 31:471–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suominen PK, Pakarinen MP, Rautiainen P, Mattila I, Sairanen H. Comparison of direct and intravesical measurement of intraab-dominal pressure in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41: 1381–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey JB, Brooks SP, Griswald J, et al. The relative merits of various methods of indirect measurement of intraabdominal pressure as a guide to closure of abdominal wall defects. J Ped Surg. 1987; 22: 1207–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachtrupp A, Henzler D, Orfao S, et al. Evaluation of a modified piezoresistive technique and a water-capsule technique for direct and continuous measurement of intra-abdominal pressure in a porcine model. Crit Care Med. 2006; 34: 745–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachtrupp A, Tons C, Fackeldey V, Hoer J, Reinges M, Schumpelick V. Evaluation of two novel methods for the direct and continuous measurement of the intra-abdominal pressure in a porcine model. Intensive Care Med. 2003; 29: 1605–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier C, Schramm R, Holstein JH, Seifert B, Trentz O, Menger MD. Measurement of compartment pressure of the rectus sheath during intra-abdominal hypertension in rats. Intensive Care Med. 2006; 32: 1644–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collee GG, Lamas DM, Ferguson C & Hanson GC. Bedside measurement of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) via an indwelling naso-gastric tube: clinical validation of the technique. Int Care Med. 1993; 19:478–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Potter TJ, Dits H, Malbrain ML. Intra- and interobserver vari-ability during in vitro validation of two novel methods for intra-abdominal pressure monitoring. Intensive Care Med. 2005; 31(5): 747–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malbrain MLNG. Validation of a novel fully automated continu-ous method to measure intra-abdominal pressure.Intensive Care Med. 2003; 29 (Supplem 1): 573.
   Google Scholar
• Cheatham ML, White MW, Sagraves SG, Johnson JL, Block EF. Abdominal perfusion pressure; A superior parameter in assess-ment of Intra-abdominal hypertension. J Trauma. 2000; 49: 621–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar