GERIATRICS ON THE RUN: RATIONALE, IMPLEMENTATION, AND PRELIMINARY FINDINGS OF A BELGIAN INTERNAL LIAISON TEAM

REFERENCES

• Van den Noortgate N, Petrovic M. The importance of a geriatric approach in medicine. Acta Clin Belg 2009; 64: 7–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Statistics, Federal Public Service Economy, Directorate-general Statistics Belgium (online). Available at: www.statbeLfgov.be/home_nLasp Cited June 18, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Lach HW. Gerontological nursing: Issues and trends in practice. In: Linton AD, Lach HW (ed). Matteson & McConnell's Geronto-logical Nursing. Concepts and practice. 3rd Ed. St. Louis: Saun-ders Elsevier. 2007: 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Milisen K, Schuurmans MJ, Hayes N. Urgent need for leader-ship in nursing care for older persons. Appl Nurs Res 2006; 19: 171–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milisen K, De Geest S, Schuurmans M, et al. European Nursing Academy for Care of Older persons. Meeting the challenges for gerontological nursing in Europe: The European Nursing Acad-emy for Care of Older Persons (ENACO). J Nutr Health Aging 2004; 8: 197–199.
   Google Scholar
• Simoens D, Milisen K, Braes T, et al. Geriatrische hulpverlening in het algemeen ziekenhuis: een pilot-onderzoek naar percep-ties, ervaren belemmeringen en kennis van Vlaamse verpleeg-kundigen en verzorgenden. [Geriatric care at the hospital: a pilot-study evaluating the perceptions, perceived barriers and knowledge of Flemish nurses and nurse assistants]. Acta Hospi-talia 2004; 3: 39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Fulmer T, Mezey M, Bottrell M, et al. Nurses Improving Care for Healthsystem Elders (NICHE): using outcomes and benchmarks for evidenced-based practice. Geriatr Nurs 2002; 23: 121–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham I, Bottrell M, Dash K et al. Profiling care and bench-marking best practice in care of hospitalized elderly. The Geri-atric InstitutionalAssessment Profile. Nurs Clin North Am 1999; 34: 239–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedone C, Ercolani S, Catani M, et al. Elderly patients with cog-nitive impairment have a high risk for functional decline dur-ing hospitalization: The GIFA study.] Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2005; 60A: 1576–1580.
   Google Scholar
• Gill TM, Allore HG, Holford HG, et al. Hospitalization, restricted activity, and the development of disability among older per-sons. JAMA 2004; 292: 2115–2124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sands LP, Yaffe K, Covinsky K, et al. Cognitive screening predicts magnitude of functional recovery from admission to 3 months after discharge in hospitalized elders.] Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003; 58A: 37–45.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Decree of 27 January 2007 regulating the Belgian care program for geriatric patients (online). Available at: www.bel-giumlex.be Cited August 10, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• McCusker J, Bellavance F, Cardin S, et al. Detection of older people at increased risk of adverse health outcomes after an emergency visit:The ISAR screening tool. ]Am GeriatrSoc 1999; 47:1229–1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meldon SW, Mion LC, Palmer RM, et al. A brief risk-stratifica-tion tool to predict repeat emergency department visits and hospitalizations in older patients discharged from the emer-gency department. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10: 224–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland K, Maitra AK, Richardson DA, et al. The discharge of elderly patients from an accident and emergency department: functional changes and risk of readmission. Age Ageing 1990; 19: 415–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenis C, Geeraerts A, Braes T, et al. The Flemish version of the Triage Risk Screening Tool (TRST): a multidimensional short screening tool for the assessment of elderly patients. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2006; 60\(suppl.1): 31.
   Google Scholar
• Geyskens K, De Ridder K, Sabbe M, et al. [Prediction of func-tional decline in elderly patients discharged from the accident and emergency department]. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 2008; 39: 16–25.
   Google Scholar
• Moons P, De Ridder K, Geyskens K, et al. Screening for risk of re-admission of patients aged 65 years and above after discharge from the emergency department: predictive value of four in-struments. Eurj Emerg Med 2007; 14: 315–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz S, Akpom CA. Index of ADL. Med Care 1976; 14(5): 116–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson YI, Arfken CL, Birge SJ. Clock completion: An objective screening test for dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993; 41: 1235–1240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, et al. Clarifying confusion : The confusion assessment method. A new method for detec-tion of delirium. Ann Intern Med 1990: 113: 941–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyl MT, Alessi CA, Harker JO, et al. Development and testing of a five-item version of the Geriatric Depression Scale. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999; 47:873–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellas B, Villars H, Abellan G, et al. Overview of the MNA - Its history and challenges.] Nutr Health Aging 2006; 10:456–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton D, McLaren R, Exton-Smith AN. An investigation of ge-riatric nursing problems in hospital. London: Churchill Living-stone. 1962: 194–236.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: Self-main-taining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontolo-gist 1969; 9: 179–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steeman E, Moons P, Milisen K et al. Implementation of dis-charge management for geriatric patients at risk of readmis-sion or institutionalization. Intl Qua! Health Care 2006; 18: 352–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgermans L, Abraham L, Milisen K, et al. Nursing case man-agement for geriatric Patients and their families: Description of a clinical modeL NursClinNorthAm 1998; 33: 529–542.
   Google Scholar
• Gayton D, Wood-Dauphinee S, de Lorimer M, et al.Trial of a ge-riatric consultation team in an acute care hospital. JAm Geriatr Soc 1987; 35: 726–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidán M, Serra JA, Moreno C, et al. Efficacy of a comprehen-sive geriatric intervention in older patients hospitalized for hip fracture: A randomized, controlled triaL J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53: 1476–1482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis G, Langhorne P. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older hospital patients. Br Med Bull 2005; 31:45–59.
   Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini Mental State": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.] Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland GD, et al. Comprehensive assessment: A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet 1993; 342: 1032–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philips LS, Branch WT, Cook CB, et al. Clinical inertia. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135: 825–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor PJ, JM, Johnson PE, et al. Clinical inertiaand outpatient medical errors. Advances in Patient Safety, vol 2. Available at; http://www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/advances/vol2/0Connor.pdf. Cited March 9, 2009
   Google Scholar
• Cohen Hi, Feussner JR, Weinberger M, et al. A controlled trial of inpatient and outpatient geriatric evaluation and manage-ment. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:905–912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kircher TTJ, Wormstall H, Muller PH, et al. A randomized trial of a geriatric evaluation and management consultation services in frail hospitalized patients. Age Ageing 2007; 36: 36–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieland D. The effectiveness and costs of comprehensive ge-riatric evaluation and management. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2003; 48: 227–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman L, Lee T, Rudd P. Ten commandments for effective consultations. Arch Intern Med 1983; 143: 1753–1755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medical Research Council. A Framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for Complex Interventions to Improve Health. April 200. Available at: http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Utilities/Documentrecord/index.htm?d=MRC003372 Cited March 10, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwood B. Methodological issues in evaluating complex health care interventions. JAdv Nurs 2006; 54:612–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley A, Strannge V, Bonnel C et al. Process evaluation in ran-domized controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ 2006; 332: 413–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walach H, Falkenberg T, Fonnebo V et al. Circular instead of hierarchical: methodological principles for the evaluation of complex interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006; 24: 6–29.
   Google Scholar
• Treweek S. Complex interventions and the chamber of secrets: understanding why they work and why they do not. ]R Soc Med 2005; 98: 33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierckx de Casterle B, Willemse A, Verschueren M, Milisen K. Impact of clinical leadership development on the clinical lead-er, nursing team, and caregiving process: a case study.] Nurs Manag 2008; 16: 753–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar