The Effect of Functional Appliances on the Skeletal Pattern

References

• Adenwalla, S. T. and Kronman, J. H. (1985) Class II Division 1 treatment with Fränkel and edgewise appliances, Angle Orthodontist, 55, 281–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlgren, J. and Andersson, I. (1977) Vertical growth changes during and after activator treatment, Transactions of the European Orthodontic Society, 53, 57–67.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlgren, J. and Laurin, C. (1976) Late results of activator-treatment: a cephalometric study, British Journal of Orthodontics, 3, 181–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Battagel, J. M. (1989) Profile changes in Class II Division 1 malocclusions: a comparison of the effects of Edgewise and Fränkel appliance therapy, European Journal of Orthodontics, 11, 243–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumrind, S., Molthen, R., West, E. E., and Miller, D. M. (1978) Mandibular plane changes during maxillary traction, American Journal of Orthodontics, 74, 32–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baumrind, S., Korn, E. L., Molthen, R., and West, E. E. (1981) Changes in facial dimensions associated with the use of forces to retract the maxilla, American Journal of Orthodontics, 80, 17–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baumrind, S., Korn, E. L., Isaacson, R. J., West, E. E., and Molthen, R. (1983a) Quantitative analysis of orthodontic and orthopedic effects of maxillary traction, American Journal of Orthodontics, 84, 384–398.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baumrind, S., Korn, E. L., Isaacson, R. J., West, E. E., and Molthen, R. (1983b) Superimpositional assessment of treatment-associated changes in the temporomandibular joint and the mandibular symphysis, American Journal of Orthodontics, 84, 443–465.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Birkebræk, L., Melsen, B., and Terp, S. (1984) A laminagraphic study of the alterations in the temporo-manidbular joint following activator treatment, European Journal of Orthodontics, 6, 257–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert, F. J. (1982) An assessment of Andresen therapy on Class II Division 1 malocclusion, British Journal of Orthodontics, 9, 149–153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carter, N. E. (1987) Dentofacial changes in untreated Class II Division 1 subjects, British Journal of Orthodontics, 14, 225–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen, A. M. (1981) A study of Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated by the Andresen appliance, British Journal of Orthodontics, 8, 159–162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen, A. M. (1983) Skeletal changes during the treatment of Class II/I malocclu-sions, British Journal of Orthodontics, 10, 147–153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Creekmore, T. D. and Radney, L. J. (1983) Fränkel appliance therapy: Orthopedic or orthodontic? American Journal of Orthodontics, 83, 89–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demisch, A. (1972) Effects of activator therapy on craniofacial skeleton in Class II/1 malocclusion, Transactions of the European Orthodontic Society, 295–310.
   Google Scholar
• Derringer, K. (1990) A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusions. Part 1—skeletal changes, British Journal of Orthodontics, 17, 33–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dietrich, U. C. (1973) Aktivator—mandibulare Reaktion, Schweiz Monat für Zahnheilkunde, 83, 1093–1104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forsberg, C. M. and Odenrick, L. (1981) Skeletal and soft tissue response to Activator treatment, European Journal of Orthodontics, 3, 247–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianelly, A. A., Brosnan, P., Martignoni, M., and Bernstein, L. (1983) Mandibular growth, condyle position and Fränkel appliance therapy, Angle Orthodontist, 53, 131–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianelly, A. A., Arena, S. A., and Bernstein, L. (1984) A comparison of Class II treatment changes noted with the light wire, edgewise and Fränkel appliances, American Journal of Orthodontics, 86, 269–276.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamilton, S. D., Sinclair, P.M., and Hamilton, R. H. (1987) A cephalometric, tomographic and dental cast evaluation of Fränkel therapy, American Journal of Orthodontics, 92, 427–434.
   Google Scholar
• Harvold, E. P. and Vargervik, K. (1971) Morphogenetic response to activator treatment, American Journal of Orthodontics, 60, 435–444.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haynes, S. (1983) Anterior vertical changes in function regulator therapy, European Journal of Orthodontics, 9, 219–223.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, S. (1986) A cephalometric study of mandibular changes in modified function regulator (Fränkel) treatment, American Journal of Orthodontics, 90, 307–320.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, J. A., Bookstein, F. L., and Shaughnessy, T. G. (1985) Skeletal and dental changes following function regulator therapy in Class II patients, American Journal of Orthodontics, 88, 91–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nielsen, I. L. (1984) Facial growth during treatment with the function regulator appliance, American Journal of Orthodontics, 85,401–410.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pancherz, H. (1976) Long term effects of Activator (Andresen appliance) treatment, Odontologisk Revy, 27 (Suppl. 35), 11–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parkhouse, R. C. (1969) A cephalometric appraisal of cases of Angle's Class II division 1 malocclusion treated by the Andresen appliance, Transactions of the British Society for the Study of Orthodontics, 55,61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Reey, R. W. and Eastwood, A. (1978) The passive activator: case selection, treatment response and corrective mechanics, American Journal of Orthodontics, 73, 378–409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Remmer, K. R., Mamandras, A. H., Hunter, W. S., and Way, D. C. (1985) Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using the activator, the Fränkel appliance and the fixed appliance, American Journal of Orthodontics, 88, 363–372.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Righellis, E. G. (1983) Treatment effects of Fränkel, activator and extra-oral traction appliances, Angle Orthodontist, 53, 107–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, N. R. E. (1983) An examination of treatment changes in children with the function regulator of Fränkel, American Journal of Orthodontics, 83, 299–310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneekluth, C. E. (1985) Mandibular repositioning with Frankel appliance therapy, American Journal of Orthodontics, 88, 177.
   Google Scholar
• Trayfoot, J. and Richardson, A. (1968) Angle Class II Division I malocclusions treated by the Andresen method, British Dental Journal, 124, 516–519.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vargergik, K. and Harvold, E. H. (1985) Responses to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions, American Journal of Orthodontics, 88, 242–251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wieslander, L. and Lagerström, L. (1979) The effect of activator treatment on Class II malocclusions, American Journal of Orthodontics, 75, 20–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams, S. & Melsen, B. (1982) Condylar development and mandibular rotation and displacement during activator treatment, American Journal of Orthodontics, 81, 322–326.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woodside, D. G., Altuna, G., Harvold, E., Herbert, M., and Metaxas, A. (1983) Primate experiments in malocclusion and bone induction, American Journal of Orthodontics, 83, 460–476.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar