Balancing the Books on Orthodontic Treatment: An integrated Analysis of Change

References

• Baumrind, S., Korn, E. L, Ben-Bassat, Y. and West, E. E. (1987a) Quantitation of maxillary remodeling. 1. A description of osseous changes relative to superimposition on metallic implants. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 91,29–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumrind, S., Korn, E. L., Ben-Bassat, Y. and West, E. E. (1987b) Quantitation of maxillary remodeling. 2. Masking of remodeling effects when an ‘anatomical’ method of superimposition is used in the absence of metallic implants, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics., 91, 463–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björk, A. (1955) Facial growth in man, studied with the aid of metallic implants, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica., 13, 9–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Björk, A. (1964) Sutural growth of the upper face, studied by the implant method, European Orthodontic Society Transactions, 40, 49–65.
   Google Scholar
• Björk, A. (1968) The use of metallic implants in the study of facial growth in children: method and application. American Journal of Physical Anthropology (n.s.)., 29, 243–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björk, A. and Skieller, V. (1972) Facial development and tooth eruption. An implant study at the age of puberty, American Journal of Orthodontics., 62, 339–383.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Björk, A. and Skieller, V. (1976) Postnatal growth and development of the maxillary complex. In: J. A. McNamara, Jr (ed.). factors Affecting the Growth of the Midface, Monograph No. 6, Craniofacial Growth Series, Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp. 61–99.
   Google Scholar
• Björk, A. and Skieller, V. (1977a) Roentgencephalometric growth analysis of the mandible, Transactions of the European Orthodontic Society., 53, 51–55.
   Google Scholar
• Björk, A. and Skieller, V. (1977b) Growth of the maxilla in three dimensions as revealed radiographically by the implant method, British Journal of Orthodontics., 4, 53–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Björk, A. and Skieller, V. (1983) Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years, European Journal of Orthodontics., 5, 1–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohlmia, G. T. (1978) The relative contributions of growth and treatment in orthodontically corrected Class 11 malocclusion, M.S.D. Thesis, Department of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, G (1940) Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students, Interscience Publications, New York.
   Google Scholar
• De Coster, L. (1951) Hereditary potentiality versus ambient factors, European Orthodontic Society, Report of the Twenty-fifth Congress [sic; Report of the Twenty-Seventh Congress], 227–234.
   Google Scholar
• Dibbets, J. M. H. (1990) A method for structural mandibular superimpositioning, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics., 97, 66–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doppel, D. M., Damon, W. M., Joondeph, D. R. and little, R. M. (1994) An investigation of maxillary superimposition techniques using metallic implants, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics., 105, 161–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, W. B. (1948) Variations in facial relationships: their significance in treatment and prognosis, American Journal of Orthodontics., 34, 812–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ford, E. H. R. (1958) Growth of the human cranial base, American Journal of Orthodontics., 44, 498–506.
   Google Scholar
• Hans, M.G., Kishiyama, C., Parker, S. H., Wolf, G. R. and Noachtar, R. (1994) Cephalometric evaluation of two treatment strategies for deep over bile correction, Angle Orthodontist., 64, 265–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J. E., Johnston, L. E. and Moyers, R. E. (1963) A cephalometric template, its construction and clinical significance, American Journal of Orthodontics., 49, 249–63.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, W. J. B. (1983) The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements, American Journal of Orthodontics., 83, 382–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobson, A. (1975) The ‘Wits’ appraisal of jaw disharmony, American Journal of Orthodontics., 67, 125–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jenkins, D. H. (1955) Analysis of orthodontic deformity employing lateral cephalometric radiography, American Journal of Orthodontics., 41, 442–52.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, L. E., Jr (1986) A comparative analysis of Class II treatments, In: Vig, P. S. and Ribbens, K. A. (eds), Science and Clinical Judgment in Orthodontics, Ann Arbor, Center for Human Growth and Development, pp. 103–148.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, L. E., Jr, Lin, S-S. and Peng, S. (1988) Anchorage loss: a comparative analysis, Journal of the Tweed foundation., 16, 23–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keeling, S. D., Cabassa, S. R. and King, G. J. (1993) Systematic and random errors associated with Johnston s cephalo-metric analysis. British Journal of Orthodontics., 20, 101–107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knott, V. B. (1969) Ontogenetic change of four cranial base segments in girls, Growth., 33, 123–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knott, V. B. (1971) Change in cranial base measures of human males and females from age 6 years to early adulthood, Growth., 35, 145–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Latham, R. A. (1972) The sella point and the postnatal growth of the human cranial base, American Journal of Orthodontics., 41, 156–162.
   Google Scholar
• Livieratos, F. A. and Johnston, L. E., Jr (1995) A comparison of one- and two-stage non-extraction alternatives in matched Class II samples, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics., 108, 118–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luder, H. V. (1981) Effects of activator treatment—evidence for the occurrence of two different types of reaction, European Journal of Orthodontics., 3, 205–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luecke, P. E., III, and Johnston, L. E., Jr (1992) The effect of maxillary first-bicuspid extraction and incisor retraction on mandibular position: testing the central dogma of ‘functional orthodontics’, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics., 101, 4–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luppanapornlarp, S. and Johnston, L. E., Jr (1993) The effects of premolar-extraction treatment: a long-term comparison of outcomes in ‘clear-cut’ extraction and nonextraction Class II patients. Angle Orthodontist, 63, 257–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melsen, B. (1974) The cranial base, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 32 (Supplement 62), 1–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, I. L. (1989) Maxillary superimposition: a comparison of three methods for cephalometric evaluation of growth and treatment change, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics., 95, 422–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquette, D. E., Beattie, J. R. and Johnston, L. E., Jr (1992) A long-term comparison of non-extraction and bicuspid-extraction edgewise therapy in ‘borderline’ Class II patients, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics., 102, 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popovich, R. and Grainger, R. M. (1959) One community's orthodontic problems, In: R. E. Moyers and P. Jay (eds.), Orthodontics in Mid-Century, C.V. Mosby, St Louis, pp. 192–246.
   Google Scholar
• Riolo, M. L., Moyers, R. E., McNamara, J. A., Jr, and Hunter, W. S. (1974) An atlas of craniofacial growth, Center for Human Growth and Development, Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. H. (1958) The cranial base, American Journal of Physical Anthropology (n.s.), 16, 319–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieslander, L. (1963) The effect of orthodontic treatment on the concurrent development of the craniofacial complex, American Journal of Orthodontics., 49, 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, W. L. (1947) The assessment of anteroposterior dysplasia, Angle Orthodontist., 17, 97–109.
   Google Scholar