Theoretical Considerations of Headgear Therapy: A Literature Review 2. Clinical response and usage

References

• Armstrong, M. M. (1971) Controlling the magnitude, direction and duration of extra-oral force, American Journal of Orthodontics, 59, 217–243.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barton, J. J. (1972) High-pull headgear versus cervical traction. A cephalometric comparison, American Journal of Orthodontics, 62, 517–529.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baumrind, S. (1973) Facial changes associated with the use of headgear—a quantitative assessment. In Transactions of the Third International Orthodontic Conference, London. J. T. Cook, Crosby Lockwood Staples, London.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, M. (1976) Directional forces, British Journal of Orthodontics, 3, 131–137.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D. E. J. Bowden Theoretical considerations of headgear therapy: a literature review. 1. Mechanical principles, British Journal of Orthodontics, 5, 145–152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burstone, C. J. (1962) Vistas in Orthodontics. V Mechanics. The biomechanics of tooth movement. Ed. Kraus, B. S. and Riedel, R. A. Kimpton, London.
   Google Scholar
• Creekmore, T. D. (1967) Inhibition or stimulation of vertical growth of the facial complex, its significance to treatment, Angle Orthodontist, 37, 285–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewel, B. F. (1967) Serial extraction. Its limitations and contraindications in orthodontic treatment, American Journal of Orthodontics, 53, 904–921.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards, J. G. (1976) A study of the anterior portion of the palate as it relates to orthodontic therapy, American Journal of Orthodontics, 69, 249–273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gianelly, A. A. and Valentini, V (1976) The role of ‘orthopaedics’ and orthodontics in the treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusions, American Journal of Orthodontics, 69, 668–678.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gould, E. (1957) Mechanical principles in extra oral anchorage, American Journal of Orthodontics, 43, 319–333.
   Google Scholar
• Graber, T. M. (1969) Dento-facial orthopaedics. In Current orthodontic concepts and techniques. Vol. 11, T. M. Graber (Ed), Philadelphia; W. B. Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• Greenspan, R. A. (1970) Reference charts for controlled extra-oral force application to maxillary molars, American Journal of Orthodontics, 58, 486–491.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haas, A. J. (1970) Palatal expansion. Just the beginning of dento-facial orthopaedics, American Journal of Orthodontics, 57, 219–255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harvold, E. P. (1974) The activator in interceptive orthodontics, C. V. Mosby Company, St. Louis
   Google Scholar
• Hasund, A. (1972) The Bergen Technique, A clinical manual for a light wire edgewise technique. Orthodontic Department, Dental School, University of Bergen, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Hickham, J. H. (1974) Directional edgewise orthodontic approach, Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, 8, 617–633.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jakobsson, S. O. (1967) Cephalometric evaluation of treatment effect on Class II. division 1 malocclusions, American Journal of Orthodontics, 53, 446–457.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King, E. W. (1957) Cervical anchorage in Class II division 1 treatment; a cephalometric appraisal, Angle Orthodontist, 27, 98–104.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, P. L. (1957) An evaluation of cervical traction on the maxilla and the upper first permanent molar, Angle Orthodontist, 27, 61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kloehn, S. J. (1953) Orthodontics—force or persuasion, Angle Orthodontist, 23, 56–65.
   Google Scholar
• Kloehn, S. J. (1961) Evaluation of cervical anchorage force in treatment, Angle Orthodontist, 31, 91–104.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, R. J. (1968) Control of anterior vertical dimension and proper selection of extra-oral anchorage, Angle Orthodontist, 38, 340–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melsen, B. and Enemark, H. (1969) Effect of cervical anchorage studied by the implant method, Transactions of the European Orthodontic Society, 435–447.
   Google Scholar
• Merrifield, L. L. and Cross, J. J. (1970) Directional forces, American Journal of Orthodontics, 57, 435–464.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore, A. W. (1959) Orthodontic treatment factors in Class II malocclusion, American Journal of Orthodontics, 45, 323–352.
   Google Scholar
• Newcombe, M. R. (1958) Some observations on extra oral treatment, Angle Orthodontist, 28, 131–148.
   Google Scholar
• Northcutt, M. E. (1975) Updating the timing headgear, Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, 9, 713–717.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oosthuizen, L., Dijkman, J. F. P. and Evans, W. G. (1973) A mechanical appraisal of the Kloehn extra-oral assembly, Angle Orthodontist, 43, 221–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orton, H. S. (1965) An evaluation of five methods of derotating upper molar teeth, Transactions of the British Society for the Study of Orthodontics, 121–128.
   Google Scholar
• Poulton, D. R. (1959) Changes in Class II malocclusion with and without occipital headgear therapy, Angle Orthodontist, 29, 234–250.
   Google Scholar
• Poulton, D. R. (1964) A three year survey of Class II malocclusions with and without headgear, Angle Orthodontist, 34, 181–193.
   Google Scholar
• Reitan, K. (1969) Biomechanical principles and reactions, in Current orthodontic concepts and techniques, Vol. 1, T. M. Graber (Ed). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts, R. M. (1960) The influence of orthodontic treatment on facial growth and development, Angle Orthodontist, 30, 103–133.
   Google Scholar
• Root, T. L. (1975) J. C. O. interviews—On headgear, Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, 9, 20–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandusky, W. C. (1965) Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Kloehn types of cervical traction used as an auxiliary with the edgewise mechanism following Tweed's principles for correction of Class II Division 1 malocclusion, American Journal of Orthodontics, 51, 262–287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schudy, F. F. (1963) Cant of the occlusal plane and the axial inclinations of teeth, Angle Orthodontist, 33, 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Schudy, F. F. (1964) Vertical growth versus anteroposterior growth as related to function and treatment, Angle Orthodontist, 34, 75–93.
   Google Scholar
• Schudy, F. F. (1965) The rotation of the mandible resulting from growth: its implications in orthodontic treatment, Angle Orthodontist, 35, 36–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silverstein, A. (1954) Changes in the bony facial profile coincident with treatment of Class II, division 1 (Angle) malocclusion, Angle Orthodontist, 24, 214–237.
   Google Scholar
• Thurow, R. C. (1970) Atlas of orthodontic principles, C. V. Mosby Co., St. Louis: Missouri.
   Google Scholar
• Weislander, L. (1963) The effect of orthodontic treatment on the concurrent development of the craniofacial complex, American Journal of Orthodontics, 49, 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Worms, F. W., Isaacson, R. J. and Speidel, T. M. (1973) A concept and classification of centers of rotation and extra oral force systems, Angle Orthodontist, 43, 384–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar