Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults

References

• Andrews MW, Dowling WJ (1991) The development of perception of interleaved melodies and control of auditory attention. Music Perception 8: 349–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arehart KH (1994) Effects of harmonic content on complex-tone fundamental frequency dis-crimination in hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95: 3574–3585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bregman A (1990) Auditory Scene Analysis: the perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp 455–528.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen NL, Waltzman S, Fisher SG, The Department of Veterans Affairs Cochlear Implant Study Group (1993) A prospective, randomized study of cochlear implants. New England Journal of Medicine 328: 233–237.
   Google Scholar
• Cornsweet TN (1962) The staircase-method in psychophysics. American Journal of Psychology 75: 485–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuddy L, Upitis R (1992) Aural perception. In Colwell R (ed) Handbook of Research on Music Teaching and Learning, pp 338–339. New York: Schirmer Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dorman M, Basham K, McCandless G, Dove H (1991) Speech understanding and music appreci-ation with the Ineraid cochlear implant. The Hearing Journal 44: 32–37.
   Google Scholar
• Dorman MF, Smith M, Smith L, Parkin JL (1994) The pitch of electrically presented sinusoids. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95: 1677–1679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman MF, Smith M, Smith L, Parkin JL (1996) Frequency discrimination and speech recogni-tion by patients who use the Ineraid and continuous interleaved sampling cochlear-implant signal processors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99: 1174–1184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling WJ, Bartlett JC (1981) The importance of interval information in long-term memory for melodies. Psychomusicology 1: 30–49.
   Google Scholar
• Fearn R, Wolfe J (1998) The relative importance of rate and place: experiments using pitch-scaling techniques with cochlear implantees. Research presentation at the Seventh Symposium on Cochlear Implants in Children, Iowa City, Iowa, 4–7 June.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita S, Ito J (1999) Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Annals of Otol-ogy, Rhinology and Laryngology 108: 634–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller K (1998) Music appreciation from the perspective of implant recipients. CONTACT 12(3): 24–25.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller K, Lansing C (1991) Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 34: 916–920.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller K, Woodworth G, Robin D, Witt S, Knutson JF (1997) Perception of rhythmic and sequential patterns by normally hearing adults and adult cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing 18: 252–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller K, Knutson JF, Woodworth G, Witt S, DeBus B (1998) Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 9: 1–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson JF, Witt S, Murray KT, Tyler RS (2000) Musical backgrounds, lis-tening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 11: 390–406.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller, K, Witt, S, Woodworth, G, Mehr, M, Knutson, J (2002) The effects of frequency, instru-mental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Henning GB (1965) Frequency discrimination of random-amplitude tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 39: 336–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesteadt W (1980) An adaptive procedure for subjective judgments. Perception and Psy-chophysics 28: 85–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutson JF, Hinrichs JV, Tyler RS, Gantz BJ, Schartz HA, Woodworth G (1991) Psychological predictors of audiological outcomes of multichannel cochlear implants: preliminary findings. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 100: 817–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumhansl CL (1991) Music psychology: Tonal structures in perception and memory. Annual Review of Psychology 42: 277–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott H, McKay C (1997) Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101: 1622–1631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay CM, McDermott HJ, Clark GM (1996) The perceptual dimensions of single-electrode and non-simultaneous dual-electrode stimuli in cochlear implantees. Journal of the Acousti-cal Society of America 99: 1079–1090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monahan CB, Carterette EC (1985) Pitch and duration as determinants of musical space. Music Perception 3: 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer C, Krumhansl CL (1987) Pitch and temporal contributions to musical phrase perception: effects of harmony, performance timing, and familiarity. Perception and Psychophysics 41: 505–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijl S (1997) Labeling of musical interval size by cochlear implant patients and normally hearing subjects. Ear and Hearing 18: 364–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijl S, Schwartz D (1995) Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 98: 886–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz E, Kerber M (1994) Music perception with the MED-EL implants. In Hochmair-Desoyer LJ, Hochmair EC (eds) Advances in Cochlear Implants, pp 326–332. Manz: Wien.
   Google Scholar
• Simon HA, Kotovsky K (1963) Human acquisition of concepts for sequential patterns. Psycho-logical Review 70: 543–546.
   Google Scholar
• Smith JD, Nelson DBK, Grohskopf LA, Appelton T (1994) What child is this? What interval was that? Familiar tunes and music perception in novice listeners. Cognition 52: 23–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stainsby TH, McDermott HJ, McKay CM, Clark GM (1997) Preliminary results on spectral shape perception and discrimination of musical sounds by normal hearing subjects and cochlear implantees. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, Thessa-loniki, Hellas, 25–30 September.
   Google Scholar
• Summers V, Leek MR (1998) FO processing and the separation of competing speech signals by listeners with normal hearing and with hearing loss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 41: 1294–1306.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg J (1987) The Science of the Singing Voice. Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tillman TW, Carhart R (1966) An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6, Technical Report No. SAM-TR-66-55, Brooks Air Force Base, TX, USAF School of Aerospace Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Townshend B, Cotter N, Van Campernolle D , White R (1987) Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 82: 106–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trehub S, Morrongiello BA, Thorpe LA (1985) Children's perception of familiar melodies: the role of intervals, contour, and key. Psychomusicology 5: 39–49.
   Google Scholar
• Treutwein B (1995) Mini review. Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Vision Research 35: 2503–2522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler RS, Preece JP, Tye-Murray N (1986) Iowa phoneme and sentence test [laser video disc]. Iowa City, IA: The University of Iowa, Department of Otolaryngology.
   Google Scholar