REFERENCES
- Buchner A, Frohne-Buchner C, Battmer RD, Lenarz T (2003) Investigation of stimulation rates between 500 and 5000 pps with the Clarion 1.2, Nucleus CI24 and Clarion CII devices. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Electronic Implants in Otology and Conventional Hearing Aids 5-7 June 2003, Toulouse, France.
- Kiefer J, van Ilberg C, Hubner-Egner J, Rupprecht V, Knecht R (2000) Optimized speech under-standing with the continuous interleaved sampling speech coding strategy in patients with cochlear implants: effect of variations in stimulation rate and number of channels. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology 109: 1009–1020
- Loizou P, Poroy O, Dorman M (2000) The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108(2): 790–802
- Vandali AE, Whitford LA, Plant KL, Clark GM (2000) Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Ear and Hearing 21(6): 608–624