Assessment of the Reliability and Repeatability of Landmarks Using 3-D Cephalometric Software

References

• Broadbent BH: A new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontics. Angle Orthod 1931; 1:45–66.
   Google Scholar
• Tweed CH: Frankfort-mandible Plane in orthodontic diagnosis, classification, treatment planning and prognosis. Am J Orthod 1946; 32:175–230.
   Google Scholar
• Tweed CH: The diagnostic facial triangle in the control of treatment objectives. Am J Orthod 1969; 55:651–667.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tweed CH: Clinical orthodontics. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby. 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Bjork A: Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod 1969; 55:585–599.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bjork A, Solow B: Measurement on radiographs. J Dent Res 1962; 41:672–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjork A: Cranial base development. Am J Orthod 1955; 41:198–225.
   Google Scholar
• Downs WB: The role of cephalometrics in orthodontic case analysis and diagnosis. Am J Orthod 1951; 38:162–181.
   Google Scholar
• Downs WB: Variations in facial relationships, their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod 1948; 34:812–840.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Downs WB: Analysis of the dento-facial profile. Angle Orthod 1956; 26:191–212.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner C: Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthod 1959; 29:8–29.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner C: The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1960; 46:721–735.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts RM: A foundation for cephalometric communication. Am J Orthod 1960; 46:330–357.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts RM: Cephalometric analysis and synthesis. Angle Orthod 1961; 31:141–156.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts RM: The evolution of diagnosis to computerized cephalometrics. Am J Orthod 1969; 55:795–803.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sassouni V: Roentgenographic analysis of cephalo-facial-dental relationships. Am J Orthod 1955; 41:735–764.
   Google Scholar
• Shudy FF: Cant of the occlusal plane and axial inclinations of teeth. Angle Orthod 1963; 33:69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Shudy FF: Vertical growth versus antero-posterior growth as related to function and treatment. Angle Orthod 1964; 34:75–93.
   Google Scholar
• Shudy FF: The rotation of the mandible resulting from growth: its implications in orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1965; 35:36–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siriwat PP, Jarabak JR: Malocclusion and facial morphology. Is there a Relationship? An Epidemiologic study. Angle Orthod 1985; 55:127–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludlow JB, Gubler M, Cedivanes L, Mol A: Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs. conventional cephalometric views. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2009; 136:312.e1–312.e10.
   Google Scholar
• Giannì E: Cranio-maxillo-dental asymmetries and postero-anterior teleradiography. Mondo Ortod 1977; 19:8–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bracco P, Dirodi G, Lucchese V:. Asimmetrie strutturali: elementi diagnostici necessari. Minerva Ortognat 1994; 4:171–179.
   Google Scholar
• Tanteri E, Bracco A, Prandi R: Elementi di Gnatologia: Dalla pratica alla riabilitazione. Vol 2. RC Libri: 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Tinazzi Martini P, Bergamo Andreis IA: A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998; 8:1558–1564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagravère MO, Major PW: Proposed reference point for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis with cone-beam computerized tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2005; 128:657–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swennen GRJ, Schutyser F: Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multislice vs. cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orhod Dentofac Orthop 2006; 130:410–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olszewski R, Zech F, Cosnard G, Denis JM, Vynckier S, Zech F: Threedimensional computed tomography cephalometric craniofacial analysis: experimental validation in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 36:828–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Ludlow J, Cevidanes LHS, Mol A: In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Angle Orthod 2008; 78:873–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swennen GRJ, Schutyser F, Barth EL, De Groeve P, De Mey A: A new method of 3-D cephalometry part I: the anatomical Cartesian 3-D reference system. J Craniofac Surg 2006; 17:314–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent BH, Broadbent BH Jr, Golden WH: Bolton standard of dentofacial development growth. St Louis: C.V. Mosby, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Cevidanes LHS, Bailey LJ, Tucker Jr GR, Styner MA, Mol A, Phillips CL, et al.: Superimposition of 3-D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005; 34:369–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cevidanes LHS, Styner MA, Proffit WR: Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006; 129:611–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swennen GRJ, Mollemans W, Schutyser F: Three-dimensional treatment planning of orthognathic surgery in the era of virtual planning. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67:2080–2092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagravère MO, Gordon JM, Guedes IH, Flores-Mir C, Carey JP, Heo G, et al.: Reliability of traditional cephalometric landmarks as seen in threedimensional analysis in maxillary expansion treatments. Angle Orthod 2009; 79:1047–1056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira AEF, Cevidanes LHS, Phillips C, Motta A, Burke B, Tyndall D, et al.: Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107:256–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston WJ: The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983; 83:382–390.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lou L, Lagravere MO, Compton S, Major PW, Flores-Mir, C: Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104:402–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moerenhout BA, Gelaude F, Swennen GR, Casselman JW, Van Der Sloten J, Mommaerts MY: Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 37:18–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vlijmen OJC, Maal T, Bergè J, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuljpers-Jagtman AM: A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 39:156–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar