Orthopaedic Implant Retrieval: An Interdisciplinary Approach

References

• Blunn GW, Joshi AB, Minns RJ, Lidgren L, Lilley P, Ryd L, et al: Wear in retrieved condylar knee arthroplasties. A comparison of wear in different designs of 280 retrieved condylar knee prostheses.,/ Arthiy)piaso: 12:281–290, 1997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan JJ, O'Rourke MR, Goetz DD, Schmalzried TP, Campbell PA, Johnston RC: Tibial post impingement in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Re/at Res 404:83–88, 2002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collier JP, Sperling D,K, Currier JH, Sutula LC, Scum KA, Mayor MB: Impact of gamma sterilization on clinical performance of polyethylene in the knee.Arthropla.s.ty 11:377–389, 1996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conditt MA, Thompson MT, Usrey MM, Ismaily SK, Noble PC: Backside wear of polyethylene tibial inserts: mechanism and magnitude of material loss. J Bone Joint Surg Ain 87:326–331, 2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook SD, Thomas KA: Fatigue failure of noncemented porouscoated implants. A retrieval study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:20–24, 1991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma SCP, Dorey F. Amstutz H: The Fate of Explanted Joint Prostheses. In: Society For Biomaterials Implant Retrieval Symposium, St. Charles, Illinois, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Muratoglu OK, Ruberti J, Melotti S, Spiegelberg SH, Greenbaum ES, Harris WI-I: Optical analysis of surface changes on early retrievals of highly cross-linked and conventional poly-ethylene tibial inserts. JArthrop/asty 18(Suppl 1):42–47, 2003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rimnac CMWT, Burnstein AH: Retrieval of Orthopaedic Im-plants at the Hospital for Special Surgery. In: Society For Biomaterials Symposium on Retrieval and Analysis of Surgical Implants and Biomaterials., 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Won CH, Rohatgi S., Kraay Mj, Goldberg VM, Rimnac CM: Effect of resin type and manufacturing method on wear of polyethylene tibial components. Clin On/top Re/at Res 376:161–171, 2000
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright TM, Rimnac CM, Stulberg SD, Mintz L., Tsao AK, Klein RW, et al: Wear of polyethylene in total joint replacements. Observations from retrieved PCA knee implants. Clin Oil/top Re/at Res 276:126–134, 1992
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook SD, Thomas KA, Haddad RJ Jr: Histologic analysis of retrieved human porous-coated total joint components. Clin On/top Re/at Res 234:90–101, 1988
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Don: LDBR, Emmanual J. Meldrum R: Histologic, biochemical, and ion analysis of tissue and fluids retrieved during total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 261:82–95, 1990
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gutierres M, Hussain NS, Lopes MA, Afonso A., Cabral AT, Almeida L, et al: Histological and scanning electron microscopy analyses of bone/implant interface using the novel Bone-like synthetic bone graft. J Orthop Res 24:953–958, 2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stulberg SD, Stulberg BN, Hamati Y, Tsao A: Failure mechanisms of metal-backed patellar components. Clin Oil/top Re/at Res 236:88–105, 1988
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Togawa D, Bauer TW, Lieberman IH, Sakai FL Lumbar intervertebral body fusion cages: histological evaluation of clinically failed cages retrieved from humans. J Bone Joint Sims; An, 86-A:70–79, 2004
   Google Scholar
• Togawa D, Bauer TW, Lieberman IH, Takikawa S: Histologic evaluation of human vertebral bodies after vertebral augmentation with polymethyl methacrylate. Spine 28:1521–1527, 2003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann AA, Bachus KN, Bloebaum RD: Comparative study of human cancellous bone remodeling to titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants. J Arthrop/asty 8:157–166, 1993
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collier JP, Bauer TW, Bloebaum RD, Bobyn JD, Cook SD, Galante JO, et al: Results of implant retrieval from postmortem specimens in patients with well-functioning, long-term total hip replacement. Clin Oil/top Re/at Res 274: 97–112, 1992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer T: Uncemented acetabular components. Histologic analysis of retrieved hydroxyapatite-coated and porous implants. J Arthroplasty 8:167–177, 1993
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bauer TW, Geesink RC, Zimmerman R, McMahon IT: Hy-droxyapatitecoated femoral stems. Histological analysis of components retrieved at autopsy..! Bone Joint Sung Am 73:1439–1452, 1991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloebaum RD, Bachus KN, Rubman MH, Dorr LD: Postmortem comparative analysis of titanium and hydroxyapatite porous-coated femoral implants retrieved from the same patient. A case study. ./ Arthropktsty 8:203–211, 1993
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bloebaum RD, Merrell M, Gustke K, Simmons M: Retrieval analysis of a hydroxyapatite-coated hip prosthesis. Chu Orthop Relat Res 267:97–102, 1991
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook SD, Barrack RL, Salkeld SL, Prewett AB, Edmunds JO Jr: Bone ingrowth into a porous-coated total shoulder component retrieved postmortem., J Arthroplasty 8:189–194, 1993
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crepeau MJHA, Daniels AU, Bloebaum RD: Implementation of an Implant Retrieval Program. In: Society for Biomaterials Symposium on Retrieval and Analysis of Surgical Implants and Biomaterills, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Currey JD, Brear K. Zioupos P, Reilly GC: Effect of formal-dehyde fixation on some mechanical properties of bovine bone. Biomaterials 16:1267–1271, 1995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavernia C.f. Sierra RJ, Hungerford DS, Krackow K: Activity level and wear in total knee arthroplasty: a study of autopsy retrieved specimens. Arthroplasty 16:446–453, 2001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney WI, Jasty M. Burke DW, O'Connor DO, Zalenski EB, Bragdon C. et al: Biomechanical and histologic investigation of cemented total hip arthroplasties. A study of autopsyretrieved femurs after in vivo cycling. Clin Oil/lop Re/at Res 249:129–140, 1989
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piclhorz LE, Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, Sumner DR, Galante JO: A quantitative study of bone and soft tissues in cementless porous-coated acetabular components retrieved at autopsy. Anthroplasty 8:213–225, 1993
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmalzreid TPMW. Jasty M., Kwong LM, Harris WH: Autopsy studies of the bone-cement interface in well-fixed cemented total hip arthroplasties. .1 Arthroplasty 8:179–188, 1993
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tonino A, Oosterbos C, Rahmy A, Therin M. Doyle C: Hy-droxyapatite-coated acetabular components. Histological and histomorphometric analysis of six cups retrieved at autopsy between three and seven years after successful implantation. Bone Joint Sung Am 83-A817–825, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Whiteside LA, White SE, Engh CA, Head W: Mechanical evaluation of cadaver retrieval specimens of cementless bone-ingrown total hip arthroplasty femoral components. Arthropasty 8:147–155, 1993
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bloebaum RD, Dupont JA: Osteolysis from a pressfit hydroxyapatite-coated implant. A case study„/ Arthroplasty 8:195–202, 1993
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Black JEI: Implications of Implant Retrieval. Ethical Aspects in Device Retrieval. In: Society For Biomaterials Implant Retrieval Sympoium, St. Charles, Illinois, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan E: Implications of Implant Retrieval. Goals and Objectives. In: Society For Biomaterials Implant Retrieval Symposium, St. Charles, Illinois, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan J: In: Society For Biomaterials Implant Retrieval Symposium St. Charles, Illinois, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Prince JM: Implications of Implant Retrieval. Legal and liability Implications of Implant Retrieval. In: Society For Biomaterials Implant Retrieval Symposium, St. Charles, Illinois, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer T: Retrieved Implant Evaluation. Hip Society, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Hyman WABA: Implant Failure Data from FDA Required Manufacturer Reporting. In: Society For Biomaterials Implant Retrieval Symposium, St. Charles, Illinois, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller EPCA, McDermott K: Regulation of Biomaterials and Medical Devices, in Bronzino JD (ed). The Biomedical Engineering Handbook. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, pp. 2801–2818, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps I: Implications of Implant Retrieval. Post-Market Surveillance: Planning Clinical Trials of Implantable Devices to Minimize the Impact of the New Requirement. In: Society for Biomaterials Implant Retrieval Symposium, St. Charles, Illinois, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson C:for the Examination of Bone. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Bobyn JD: Hip Society, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• F561-05a Standard Practice for Retrieval and Analysis of Medical Devices, and Associated Tissues and Fluids, in ASTM, ed. Vol. 13.01. West Conshohocken, ASTM International, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ebramzadeh E., Sangiorgio SN, Lattuada F. Kang JS, Chiesa R. McKellop HA, et al: Accuracy of measurement of poly-ethylene wear with use of radiographs of total hip replacements. Bone Joint Sung Am 85-A2378–2384, 2003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jasty M, Goetz DD, Bragdon CR, Lee KR, Hanson AE, Elder JR, et al: Wear of polyethylene acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. An analysis of one hundred and twenty-eight components retrieved at autopsy or revision operations. J Bone Joint Sung Am 79:349–358, 1997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YH: Comparison of polyethylene wear associated with cobalt-chromium and zirconia heads after total hip replacement. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Sung Am 87:1769–1776, 2005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blumenthal NC, Cosma V. Jaffe W, Stuchin S: A new technique for quantitation of metal particulates and metal reaction products in tissues near implants. I Appl Biomater 5:191–193, 1994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown SAMK, Farnsworth LJ, Crowe TD: Biological Significance of Metal Ion Release. In: Lemons J (ed). Quantitative Chamcterization and Performance of Porous Implants for Hard Tissue Applications. West Conshohocken, ASTM, pp. 163–181, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Ducheyne P., WiIlems G. Martens M, Helsen J: In vivo metalion release from porous titanium-fiber material. ./Biomed Mater Res 18:293–308, 1984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison MD, Ratner BD: Scanning probe microscopy for the characterization of biomaterials and biological interactions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 831:101–113, 1997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones LCHD, Kenna RV, Braem G. Grant V: Urinary Excretion Levels of Ions in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement with a Porous-coated Prosthesis: Preliminary Results. West Conshohocken, ASTM, p. 151–162, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Silwood CJ, Grootveld M: Chemical nature of implant-derived titanium(IV) ions in synovial fluid. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 330:784–790, 2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor DO, Burke DW, Jasty M., Sedlacek RC, Harris WH: In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing. .1 Orthop Res 14:769–777, 1996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuh HCKJL, Hungerford DS: Strain Analysis of the Proximal Femur Following Total Hip Replacement. West Conshohocken, ASTM, p. 249–263, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Butler C, Jones L, Hungerford D: Initial Implant Stability of Porous Coated Femoral Components: A Mechanical Study. Orthopaedic Research Society, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Nagamine R, White SE, McCarthy DS, Whiteside LA: Effect of rotational malposition of the femoral component on knee stability kinematics after total knee arthroplasty.Arthrop/astv 10:265–270, 1995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero J. Duronio JF, Sohrabi A, Alexander N, MacWilliams BA, Jones LC, et al: Varus and valgus flexion laxity of total knee alignment methods in loaded cadaveric knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 394:243–253, 2002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wingerter S., Calvert G. Tucci M, Benghuzzi H, Russell G, Puckett A: Mechanical strength repercussions of various fixative storage methods on bone. Biomed Sci Instrum 42:290–295, 2006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hott M, Marie PJ: Glycol methacrylate as an embedding medium for bone. Stain Technol 62:51–57, 1987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recker R: Bone Histomorphometry: Techniques and Interpretation. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson C, Radley K. Mayton L: Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in ammonium hydroxide for reducing decalcification time. Biotech Histochem 70:12–18, 1995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmanual J., Hornbeck C. Emmanual JG, Campbell PA: Techniques for Large Bone Specimens and Bone with Implants. Workshop Handout. Society For Biomaterials Implant Retrieval Symposium. Snowbird, Utah, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Yang R, Davies CM, Archer CW, Richards RG: Immunohistochemistry of matrix markers in Technovit 9100 New-embedded undecalcified bone sections. Eur Cell Mater 657–71: discussion 71, 2003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berger-Gorbet M., Broxup B. Rivard C, Yahia LH: Biocom-patibility testing of NiTi screws using immunohistochemistry on sections containing metallic implants. .1 Biomed Mater Res 32:243–248, 1996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio S, Doty SB, Camacho NP, Paschalis EP, Spevak L, Mendelsohn R. et al: Optimal methods for processing mineralized tissues for Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy. Calcif Tissue Jut 70:422–429, 2002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillie R, Fullmer H: Histopathologic Technic and Practical Histochemistry. New York, McGraw Hill, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Luna L: Manual of Histologic Staining Methods of Me Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. New York, McGraw Hill, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Schmalzried TP, jasty M, Rosenberg A, Harris WH: Histologic identification of polyethylene wear debris using Oil Redostain. J Appl Bionutter 4:119–125, 1993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsao A, Jones L: Quantitative Characterization of Particulate Polyethylene Wear Debris from Failed Total Joint Arthroplasties. In: 19th Annual Meeting of the Society For Biomaterials, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Harris WH: Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An endresult study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Sing Am 51:737–755, 1969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insal I JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN: Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14, 1989
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC: "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:17–27, 1979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engh GA, Bobyn JD, Petersen TL: Radiographic and histologic study of porous coated tibial component fixation in cementless total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 11:725–731, 1988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy MH, Blessey PB, Kline AJ, Miller MD: The graft/ tunnel angles in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric comparison of two techniques for femoral tunnel placement. Arthmscopy 21:711–714, 2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mochizuki T., Muneta T. Nagase T, Shirasawa S, Akita KI, Sekiya I: Cadaveric knee observation study for describing anatomic femoral tunnel placement for two-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 22:356–361, 2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelissen RG, Bauer TW, Weidenhielm LR, LeGolvan DP, Mikhail WE: Revision hip arthroplasty with the use of cement and impaction grafting. Histological analysis of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:412–422, 1995
   Google Scholar
• Ullmark G, Obrant KJ: Histology of impacted bone-graft in-corporation. J Arthroplasty 17:150–157, 2002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar