References
- Bernstein, R., 2005. Florida, California, and Texas to dominate future population growth. US Census Bureau News. www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/population/004704.html ( Oct. 12, 2005).
- Bloetscher, F.; Meeroff, D.E.; Wright, M.E.; Yang, D.; Rojas, R.; Polar, J.; Laas, M.; Bieler, B.; Sakura-Lemessy, D.; Abdul, S.; and Fiekle, C., 2006. Defining the concentrate disposal problem and identifying potential solutions. Florida Water Resources Journal, 58: 3, 25–30.
- Bloetscher, F.; Witt, G. M.; and Fergan, R. E., 2001. Biofouling in raw water supply wells and its impact. Water Engineering & Management, 148: 10, 12–16.
- Broward-by-the-Numbers, 2004. The southeast Florida MSA. Broward County Planning Services Division, www.broward.org/planningservices/bbtn20.pdf ( Oct. 16, 2006).
- CDM, 2007. City of Dania Beach membrane pilot testing—preliminary nanofiltration test report.
- Chen, J.C. and Seidel, A., 2002. Cost optimization of nanofiltration with fouling by natural organic matter. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 128: 10, 967–973.
- El-Ramly, N. and Peterson, R.E., 2005. American desalting plants. University of Hawaii, www2.hawaii.edu/~nabil/depow.htm ( Nov. 12, 2005).
- Hudkins, J. M. and Fox, J.D., 2006. Water conservation methods at the source: a review of membrane treatment concentrate minimization strategies. Florida Water Resources Journal, 58: 8, 34–35.
- Kiefer, C.A.; Brinson, F.; and Suratt, B., 2006. Process optimization at new nanofiltration plant meets water-quality goals, saves money for Boca Raton. Florida Water Resources Journal, 58: 3, 48–56.
- Kilduff, J.E.; Mattaraj, S.; Pieracci, J.P.; and Belfort, G., 2000. Photochemical modification of poly(ether sulfone) and sulfonated poly(sulfone) nanofiltration membranes for control of fouling by natural organic matter. Conference on membrane in drinking and industrial water production, Desalination Publication, L’ Aquila, Italy, 2, 239–248.
- Lee, S.; Cho, J.; and Elimelech, M., 2005. A novel method for investigating the influence of feed water recovery on colloidal and NOM fouling of RO and NF membranes. Environmental Engineering Science, 22: 4, 496–509.
- Lin, C. J.; Shirazi, S.; and Rao, P., 2005. Mechanistic model for CaSO4 fouling on nanofiltration membrane. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 131: 10, 1387–1392.
- Ng, H.Y., 2004. RO membrane solute rejection behavior at the initial stage of colloidal fouling. Desalination, 174, 211–217.
- Sethi, S.; Walker, S.; Drewes, J.; and Xu, P., 2006. Existing and emerging concentrate minimization and disposal practices for membrane systems. Florida Water Resources Journal, 58: 6, 38–48.
- Toro, A., 2007. Technical Feasibility of Nanofiltration Concentrate Treatment With Low Pressure Reverse Osmosis, a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of College of Engineering and Computer Science in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Fla., December 2007.
- Toro, A.; Meeroff, D.E.; and Bloetscher, F.; 2007. Concentrating Concentrate: Is it a Real Opportunity? FSAWWA Conference Proceedings, FSAWWA, Stuart, Fla.
- Vrijenhoek, E.M.; Hong, S.; and Elimelech, M., 2001. Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 188, 115–128.
- Whitcomb, J. B., 2005. Florida water rates evaluation of single-family homes. South Florida Water Management District. www.swlwmd.state.fl.us/documents/reports/water_rate_report.pdf> ( Oct 16, 2006).
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112446/MPU-L1EB.png"})