Novel Trends in Dual Membrane Systems for Seawater Desalination: Minimum Primary Pretreatment and Low Environmental Impact Treatment Schemes

References

• Beery, M.; Repke, J.U.; and Wozny, G., 2009. Sustainability analysis of different SWRO pretreatment alternatives. European Desalination Society Conference, Baden-Baden, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Brehant, A.; Bonnélye, V.; and Perez, M., 2002. Comparison of MF/UF pretreatment with conventional filtration prior to RO membranes for surface seawater desalination. Desalination, 144: 53–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bu-Rashid, K. and Czolkoss, W., 2007. Pilot Tests of Multibore UF Membrane at Addur SWRO Desalination Plant, Bahrain. Desalination, 203: 229–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bu-Rashid, K. and Hussain, A., 2004. Seawater RO plant operation and maintenance experience: Addur desalination plant operation assessment. Desalination, 165: 11–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, M.; Chu, R.; Kolbe, U.; Meng, Q. Q.; Li, S. J., 2008. Integrated UF and Reverse Osmosis Membrane System For Seawater Desalination—1,000 Days Field Experience With Dow UF And Filmtec Technology In The Wang Tan Datang Power Plant. European Desalination Society Conference, EUROMED series, Dead Sea, Jordan.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, R.; Wei, J.; and Busch, M., 2009. Economic evaluation of UF + SWRO in seawater desalination. Chinese Desalination Association Conference, Qing Dao, China.
   Google Scholar
• Desormeaux, E., 2008. Seawater Reverse Osmosis, Desalination Pilot Test Program—Initial Testing and Trends ... and What Do They Mean? Monterey Bay Water Works Association (MBWWA). Monterey Bay, Calif.
   Google Scholar
• Desormeaux, E.D.; Meyerhofer, P.; and Luckenbach, H., 2009. Results from nine investigations assessing Pacific Ocean seawater desalination in Santa Cruz, Calif. IDA World Congress, Dubai.
   Google Scholar
• Dow Chemical, 2009. Dow Water Solutions FILMTEC Reverse Osmosis Membranes Technical Manual, Form No. 609–00071–0309.
   Google Scholar
• García-Molina, V.; Chang, R.; and Busch, M., 2009. First year performance review of Magong UF/RO Seawater Desalination Plant. European Desalination Society Conference, Baden-Baden, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• García-Molina, V. and Marzal, M.A., 2009. Designing membrane systems for the coming future: Perth II desalination plant. IDA World Congress, Dubai.
   Google Scholar
• Henthorne, L., 2007. Evaluation of Membrane Pretreatment for Seawater Reverse Osmosis Desalination. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation.
   Google Scholar
• Henthorne, L., 2005a. Evaluation of Membrane Pretreatment for Seawater RO Desalination. Desalination and Water Purification Research and Development Report No. 106.
   Google Scholar
• Henthorne, L., 2005b. Economic Evaluation of Membrane and Conventional SWRO Pretreatment—Results from Pilot Study. AWWA Membrane Technology Conference, Phoenix, Ariz.
   Google Scholar
• Kinser, K.; Shen, P.; Harrison, S.; and Price, M., 2009. Pretreatment Performance for Desalinating Seawater with Fluctuating Water Quality due to Circumstances at Moss Landing. AWWA Membrane Technology Conference, Memphis, Tenn.
   Google Scholar
• Knops, F.; van Hoof, S.; and Zark, A., 2007. Operating Experience of a New UF Membrane for Pre-treatment of Seawater Reverse Osmosis. IDA World Congress, Maspalomas, Gran Canaria, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Lattemann, S.; Arnana, S.; Schippers, J. C.; Kennedy, M.; and Amy, G., 2009. Multi-criteria decision support system for seawater reverse osmosis plants. European Desalination Society Conference, BadenBaden, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• NRS, 2008. Final Pilot Study Report—Texas seawater desalination demonstration project. Brownsville Public Utilities Board, Texas Water Development Board.
   Google Scholar
• Remize, P.J.; Leparc, J.; and Schrotter J.C., 2008. A pilot scale comparison between granular media filtration and low pressure membrane filtration for seawater pretreatment. European Desalination Society Conference, EUROMED series, Dead Sea, Jordan.
   Google Scholar
• Riaza, A.; Shao, E.; Busch, M.; Suarez, J.; Salas, J.; and Wang, D., 2009. Performance of outside-in pressurized UF in Qingdao pilot test. European Desalination Society Conference, Baden-Baden, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Rosberg, R., 1997. UF (new technology), a viable cost-saving pretreatment for reverse osmosis and nanofiltration—A new approach to reduce costs. Desalination, 110: 107–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syed, K.A.B.; Ben Boudinar, M.; Gulamhusein, A.; Al-Sheik Khalil, A.; Ryber, S.; Saud, M.; Kaiser, A.K.M., 2007. First Successful Operation of SWRO Plant in Saudi Arabia with UF Pretreatment. IDA World Congress on Desalination and Water Reuse, Maspalomas, Gran Canaria, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• van Hoof, S.C.J.M.; Hashim, A.; and Kordes, A.J., 1999. The effect of UF as pretreatment to reverse osmosis in wastewater reuse and seawater desalination applications. Desalination, 124: 231–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vial, D.; Doussaua, G.; and Galindo, R., 2003. Comparison of three pilot studies using Microza membranes for Mediterranean seawater pretreatment. Desalination, 156: 43–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villacorte, L.; Schurer, R.; Kennedy, M.D.; Amy, G.L.; and Schippers, J.C., 2009. The fate of transparent exopolymer particles in seawater UF-RO system: a pilot plant study in Zeeland, the Netherlands. European Desalination Society Conference, Baden-Baden, Germany.
   Google Scholar