Evaluating Membrane Options for Aquifer Recharge in Southeast Florida

References

• Bloetscher, F.; Meeroff, D.E.; Wright, M.E.; Yang, D.; Rojas, R.; Polar, J.; Laas, M.; Bieler, B.; Sakura-Lemessy, D.; Abdul, S.; and Fiekle, C., 2006. Defining the concentrate disposal problem and identifying potential solutions. Florida Water Resources Journal, 58: 3, 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Bloetscher, F. and Witt, G.M., 2001. Effects of Sand and Silt on Membrane Treatment Processes. Florida Water Resource Journal, 53: 5:29–30.
   Google Scholar
• Braghetta, A.; DiGiano, F.A.; and Ball, W.P., 1998. NOM accumulation at NF membrane surface: impact of chemistry and shear. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 124:11:1,087–1098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J.C. and Seidel, A., 2002. Cost optimization of nanofiltration with fouling by natural organic matter. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 128: 10:967–973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimick, B., 2001. Filtering and purifying water through reverse osmosis. PM Engineer, [http://Www.pmengineer.com/CDA/ArticleInformation/features/BNP__Features__Item/0,2732,24877,00.html] ( accessed July 15, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Hong, S. and Elimelech, M., 1997. Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 132: 2:159–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudkins, J.M. and Fox, J.D., 2006. Water Conservation Methods at the Source: A Review of Membrane Treatment Minimization Strategies. Florida Water Resource Journal, 58: 8:34–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hydranautics, 2003. Chemical pretreatment for RO and NF. Hydranautics, [www.membranes.com/docs/tab/TAB111.pdf] (accessed Jan. 4, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer, C.A.; Brinson, F.; and Suratt, B. 2006. Process optimization at new nanofiltration plant meets water-quality goals, saves money for Boca Raton. Florida Water Resources Journal, 58:3, 48.
   Google Scholar
• Kilduff, J.E.; Mattaraj, S.; Pieracci, J.P.; and Belfort, G., 2000. Photochemical modification of poly(ether sulfone) and sulfonated poly(sulfone) nanofiltration membranes for control of fouling by natural organic matter. Conference on membrane in drinking and industrial water production, Desalination Publication, L' Aquila, Italy, 2: 239–248
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.; Cho, J.; and Elimelech, M., 2005. A novel method for investigating the influence of feed water recovery on colloidal and NOM fouling of RO and NF membranes. Environmental Engineering Science, 22: 4:496–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C.J.; Shirazi, S.; and Rao, P., 2005. Mechanistic model for CaSO4 fouling on nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 131: 10:1387–1392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattaraj, S.; Sensibaugh, J.E.; Pieracci, J.P.; Belford, G.; and Kilduff, J.E., 1999. Effects of natural organic matter on nanofiltration membrane fouling and mitigation by membrane surface modification. Fourth topical conference on separations science and technology, AIChE, Dallas, Texas, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, H.Y., 2004. RO membrane solute rejection behavior at the initial stage of colloidal fouling. Desalination, 174: 211–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redondo, J.A. and Lomas, I., 2001. Y2K generation Filmtec RO membranes combined with new pretreatment techniques to treat raw water with high fouling potential: Summary of experience. Desalination, 136:287306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, A.I.; Fane, A.G.; and Waite, T.D., 1998. Nanofiltration of natural organic matter: removal, fouling and the influence of multivalent ions. Desalination, 118: 109–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel, A., and Elimelech, M., 2002. Coupling between chemical and physical interactions in natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes: implications for fouling control. Journal of Membrane Science, 203, 245–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sethi, S.; Walker, S.; Drewes, J.; and Xu, P., 2006. Existing and emerging concentrate minimization and disposal practices for membrane systems. Florida Water Resources Journal, 58, 6, 38–48.
   Google Scholar
• Sloss, E.M.; Geschwind, S.; McCaffrey, D.F.; and Ritz, B.R., 1996. Groundwater Recharge with Reclaimed Water: An Epidemiologic Assessment in Los Angeles County, 1987–1991. RAND Corp., 139.
   Google Scholar
• Toro, A.; Bloetscher, F.; and Meeroff, D.M., 2010, Concentrating the Concentrate—Pointing to Solutions for Concentrate Management, IDA Journal, 1: 1:39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Vrijenhoek, E.M.; Hong, S.; and Elimelech, M., 2001. Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 188: 115–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, J.; Yoon, Y.; Amy, G.; and Her, N., 2005. Determination of perchlorate rejection and associated inorganic fouling (scaling) for reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes under various operating conditions. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 131: 5:726–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar