Kobe and Northridge: Two earthquakes compared

LITERATURE CITED

• J. F. Dolan, K. Sieh, T. K. Rockwell, R. S. Yeats, J. Shaw, J. Suppe, G. J. Huftile, and E. M. Gath: ‘Prospects for larger or more frequent earthquakes in the Los Angeles metropolitan region’, Science, 1995, 267, 199–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. W. Jennings: ‘Fault activity map of California and adjacent regions’, Geologic Data Map 6, California Division of Mines and Geology, Sacramento, CA, USA, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• T. Matsuda: ‘Active faults and damaging earthquakes in Japan – macroseismic zoning and precaution fault zones’, in ‘Earthquake prediction – an international review’, Maurice Ewing Series 4, 279–289; 1981, Washington, DC, American Geophysical Union.
   Google Scholar
• M. Celebi: ‘Northridge (California) earthquake of January 17, 1995: unique recorded ground and structural response motions’, Proc. Workshop on ‘Implications for the future for the financial and scientific sectors after the Northridge earthquake’, San Francisco, CA, USA, February 1995, US Geological Survey/California Department of Insurance.
   Google Scholar
• Joyner and Boore: ‘Measurement characterization and prediction of strong ground motion’, Proc. Conf. Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II, Park City, UT, USA, June 1988, GT Division ASCE, 1–60.
   Google Scholar
• F. Naeim: ‘On seismic design implications of the 1994 Northridge earthquake records’, Earthquake Spectra, 1995, 11, (1), 91–110.
   Google Scholar
• T. H. Heaton, J. F. Hall, D. J. Wald, and M. H. Halling: ‘Response of high-rise and base-isolated buildings to a hypothetical Mw 7·0 blind thrust earthquake’, Science, 1995, 267, 206–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Toki: ‘Fault parameters and strong ground motions of the Hyogoken-nanbu earthquake’, Proc. Workshop on ‘World Seismic Safety Initiative on Catastrophic Risk Management’, Singapore, May 1995.
   Google Scholar
• ‘The Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994: report of data collection and analysis’, EQE International/California Office of Emergency Services, Irvine, CA, USA, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• T. Loster and A. Smolka: ‘GIS: a tool for loss estimation and scenario development in the insurance industry’, Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Seismic Zonation, Nice, France, October 1995, Association Français Genie Parasismique/Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Vol. 1, 290–297.
   Google Scholar
• H. Kameda: ‘An overall view of the great Hanshin earthquake disaster – the Hyogoken-nanbu earthquake’, Proc. Workshop on ‘World Seismic Safety Initiative on Catastrophic Risk Management’, Singapore, May 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Dou and J. B. Berrill: ‘A pattern recognition approach to evaluation of soil liquefaction potential using piezocone data’, Soil Dyn. Struct. Eng., 1993, 12, 91–101.
   Google Scholar
• Earthquake Engineering Research Institute: ‘Northridge earthquake reconnaissance report, Vol. 1’, Earthquake Spectra, 1995, 11, (suppl. C).
   Google Scholar
• J. Sfflpp: ‘Steel’s performance in the Northridge earthquake’, EQE Rev., Fall 1994, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ch. scawthorn and m. khater: ‘Fire following earthquake – conflagration potential in the Greater Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle and Memphis areas’, Insurance Institute for Property Loss Reduction, Boston, MA, USA, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• P. Gordon and h. w. richardson: ‘The business interruption effects of the Northridge earthquake’, Lusk Center Research Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA s, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Just how big is the big one?’, Risk Management Solutions, 1994; cited in Catastrophe Reinsurance Newsletter, 1994, 19, 173.
   Google Scholar
• M. Ehrke: ‘Japan: Nach dem Großen Hanshin-Erdbeben’; 1995, Bonn, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar