Industrial espionage and innovation

LITERATURE CITED

• E. Edwards: ‘Corporate espionage: legal but usually dishonest’, Manage. Accounting, 1987, 65, (10), 18–19.
   Google Scholar
• R. Carter: ‘Careless words cost business’, Accountancy, 1989, 103, (1147), 158–160.
   Google Scholar
• P. Gibbons and J. Prescott: ‘Parallel competitive intelligence processes in organisations’, Int. J. Technol. Manage., 1996, 11, (1/2), 162–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Von Hippel: ‘The sources of innovation’; 1988, New York, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• J. G. Bronson: ‘Unfriendly eyes’, IEEE Trans. Profess. Commun., 1987, 30, (3), 173–178.
   Google Scholar
• E. Rogers: ‘Information exchange and technological innovation’, in ‘The transfer and utilization of technical knowledge ’, (ed. D. Sahal), 105–123; 1982, Lexington, MA, Lexington Books; E. Braun and S. Macdonald: ‘Revolution in miniature. The history and impact of semiconductor electronics’; 1982, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• This review is based on an earlier treatment of the same subject: S. Macdonald: ‘Nothing either good or bad: industrial espionage and technology transfer’, Int. J. Technol. Manage., 1993, 8, (1/2), 95–105.
   Google Scholar
• S. Macdonald: ‘Technology beyond machines’, in ‘Manufacturing innovation and the implementation of new technologies ’, (ed. E. Rhodes and D. Wield), 41–49; 1985, Oxford, Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• A. Robertson: ‘The effect on an organization of communication with the outside world: the relationship between free flow of information and an organization’s effectiveness’, ASLIB Proc., 1975, 27, (8), 339–345.
   Google Scholar
• M. Dodgson: ‘Technological collaboration in industry’; 1993, London, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• D. J. Teece: ‘Technological transfer by multinational firms: the resource cost of transferring technological know-how’, Econ. J., 1977, 87, 242–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Macdonald: ‘Formal collaboration and informal information flow’, Int. J. Technol. Manage., 1991, 7, (1/3), 49–60.
   Google Scholar
• E. Von Hippel: ‘Cooperation between rivals: informal know-how trading’, Res. Policy, 1987, 16, 291–302; S. Schrader: ‘Informal technology transfer between firms in cooperation through information trading’, Res. Policy, 1991, 20, 153–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Davis and M. Wilkof: ‘Scientific and technical information transfer for high technology: keeping the figure in its ground’, R&D Manage., 1988, 18, (1), 45–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Macdonald: ‘Information networks and the exchange of information’, in ‘The economics of information networks ’, (ed. C. Antonelli), 51–69; 1992, Amsterdam, North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• S. Macdonald and C. Williams: ‘Beyond the boundary: an information perspective on the role of the gatekeeper in the organization’, J. Prod. Innovation Manage., 1993, 10, 417–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Appleyard: ‘Intervention’, in ‘Papers presented at the workshop on international technology transfer: promotion and barriers’, 6; 1985, Ottawa, Six Countries Programme on Aspects of Government Policies towards Technological Innovation in Industry.
   Google Scholar
• ‘An analysis of export control of US technology – a DOD perspective’, Department of Defense Science Board Task Force on Export of US Technology, Office of the Director of Defense Research and Engineering, Washington, DC, USA, 1976, iii.
   Google Scholar
• ‘An analysis of export control of US technology – a DOD perspective’, Department of Defense Science Board Task Force on Export of US Technology, Office of the Director of Defense Research and Engineering, Washington, DC, USA, 1976, 3.
   Google Scholar
• F. Bucy as quoted in W. Schatz: ‘The hitch in high tech trade’, Datamation, 1983, 29, (10), 148–159.
   Google Scholar
• S. Macdonald: ‘Technology and the tyranny of export controls. Whisper who dares’; 1990, London, Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• W. Gregory: ‘The technology transfer mess’, Aviation Week Space Technol., 14 May 1984, 13.
   Google Scholar
• D. Southard: in ‘Senate Hearings, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Committee on Government Affairs, “Transfer of United States High Technology to the Soviet Union and Soviet Bloc Nations” ’, 53; 1982, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• T. Wu: ‘The citizen partner: a key force in effective strategic export control’, Signal, Aug. 1983, 106–108.
   Google Scholar
• K. Cahill: ‘Trade wars’; 1987, London, W.H. Allen.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine: ‘Balancing the national interest. US national security export controls and global economic competition’; 1987, Washington, DC, National Academy Press; ‘Finding common ground. US export controls in a changed global environment’; 1991, Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Assessing the effect of technology transfer on US/Western security – a defense perspective’, Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, Department of Defense, Washington, DC, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• L. Branscomb: testimony before Senate Judiciary Committee: Subcommittee on Technology and Law, 16 March 1988.
   Google Scholar
• S. Macdonald: ‘Strategic export controls. Hurting the East or weakening the West?’; 1990, London, Economist Intelligence Unit.
   Google Scholar
• A. Pettigrew: ‘Information control as a power resource’, Sociology, 1972, 6, (2), 187–204.
   Google Scholar
• D. Cohen: ‘Labor mobility and trade secrets in knowledge-intensive industries’, Proc. TIP Workshop, Stanford, CA, USA, June 1983, Economics Department, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• See A. C. Cooper and A. V. Bruno: ‘Success among hightechnology firms’, Bus. Horizons, 1977, 20, (2), 16–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. W. Olney: ‘The secret world of the industrial spy’, Bus. Soc. Rev., 1988, 64, 28–32.
   Google Scholar