A Hennigian approach to bryophyte phylogeny

REFERENCES

• Anderson, L. E. (1984). Chromosome studies of bryophytes: an assessment. J. Hattori bot. Lab. 55, 187–197.
   Google Scholar
• Asakawa, Y. (1986). Chemical relationships between algae, bryophytes and pteridophytes. J. Bryol 14, 59–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, J. (1982). Classes and cladists. Syst. Zool. 31, 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Bold, H. C., Alexopoulos, C. J. & Delevoryas, T. (1980). Morphology of Plants and Fungi (4th edn). Harper and Row, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bremer, K., Humphries, C. J., Mishler, B. D. & Churchill, S. P. (in press). On the cladistics of green plants. Taxon.
   Google Scholar
• Bremer, K., & Wanntorp, H.-E. (1978). Phylogenetic systematics in botany. Taxon 27, 317–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremer, K. & Wanntorp, H.-E. (1981). The cladistic approach to plant classification. In: V. A. Funk and D. R. Brooks (eds) Advances in Cladistics, Volume 1, pp. 87-94. The New York Botanical Garden.
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, S. P., Wiley, E. O. & Hauser, L. A. (1984). A critique of Wagner groundplan-divergence studies and a comparison with other methods of phylogenetic analysis. Taxon 33, 212-232.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, G. C. S. & Duckett, J. G. (1979) Bryophyte Systematics. Systematics Association Special Volume No. 14. Academic Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Crandall-Stotler, B. (1986). Morphogenesis, developmental anatomy and bryophyte phylogenetics: con-traindications of monophyly. J. Bryol. 14, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoghue, M. J. & Cantino, P. D. (1984). The logic and limitations of the outgroup substitution approach to cladistic analysis. Syst. Bot. 9, 192–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuis, C. (1984). Willi Hennig's impact on taxonomic thought. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15, 1-1. Farris, J. S. (1970). Methods for computing Wagner trees. Syst. Zoo!. 19, 83–92.
   Google Scholar
• Farris, J. S. (1982). Simplicity and informativeness in systematics and phylogeny. Syst. Zool. 31, 413–444.
   Google Scholar
• Farris, J. S. (1983). The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. In: N. I. Platnick and V. A. Funk (eds) Advances in Clad istics, Volume 2, pp. 7–36. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Funk, V. A. & Wagner, W. H. (1982). A bibliography of botanical cladistics: I. 1981. Brittonia 34, 118–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, S. W. (1976). Are we satisfied with the rate at which bryophyte taxonomy is developing? J. Hattori bot. Lab. 41, 1–6
   Google Scholar
• Hennig, W. (1966). Phylogenetic Systematics. Univ. Ill. Press, Urbana.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, D. L. (1970). Contemporary systematic philosophies. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1, 19–54.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, D. L. (1981). The principles of biological classification: the use and abuse of philosophy. PSA [Philosophy of Science Association] 1978 (2), 130–153.
   Google Scholar
• Humphries, C. J. (1983). Primary data in hybrid analysis. In: N. I. Platnick and V. A. Funk (eds) Advances in Cladistics, Volume 2, pp. 89–103. Columbia University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Humphries, C. J. & Funk, V. A. (1984). Cladistic methodology. In: V. H. Heywood and D. M. Moore (eds) Current Concepts in Plant Taxonomy, pp. 323–362. Academic Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Kluge, A. G. (1985). Ontogeny and phylogenetic systematics. Cladistics 1, 13–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kluge, A. G. & Farris, J. S. (1969). Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. IS, 1-32. Koponen, T. (1968). Generic revision of Mniaceae Mitt. (Bryophyta). Ann. Bot. Fenn. 5, 117-117. Lewontin, R. C. (1974). The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. Columbia University Press, New York. 346 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, J. G. (1973). More on primitiveness, higher level phylogenies and ontogenetic transforma-tions. Syst. Zool. 22, 327–329.
   Google Scholar
• Maddison, W. P., Donoghue, M. J. B. Maddison, D. R. (1984). Outgroup analysis and parsimony. Syst. Zool. 33, 83-103.
   Google Scholar
• Mayr, E. (1981). Biological classification: toward a synthesis of opposing methodologies. Science 214, 510–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr, E. (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Mishler, B. D. (1985). The morphological, developmental and phylogenetic basis of species concepts in bryophytes. Bryologist 88, 207–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler, B. D. (1986). Ontogeny and phylogeny in Tortula (Musci: Pottiaceae). Syst. Bot. 11, 189-189. Mishler, B. D. & Churchill, S. P. (1984). A cladistic approach to the phylogeny of the ‘bryophytes’. Brittonia 36, 406–424.
   Google Scholar
• Mishler, B. D. & Churchill, S. P. (1985). Transition to a land flora: phylogenetic relationships of the green algae and bryophytes. Cladistics 1, 305–328.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson, G. (1969). Gill arches and the phylogeny of fishes with notes on the classification of vertebrates. Bull. Amer. Mus. Natur. Hist. 141, 475–552.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, G. (1970). Outline of a theory of comparative biology. Syst. Zool. 19, 373–384.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson, G. (1978). Ontogeny, phylogeny, palaeontology, and the biogenetic law. Syst. Zool. 27, 324–345.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, G. (1983). Reticulation in cladograms. In: N. L. Platnick and V. A. Funk (eds) Advances in Cladistics, Volume 2, pp. 105-111. Columbia University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, M. E. (1986). Bryophyte phylogeny in terms of chromosome cytology. J. Bryol. 14, 43-43. Parenti, L. R. (1980). A phylogenetic analysis of the land plants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 13, 225-225. Patterson, C. (1982). Morphological characters and homology. In: K. A. Joysey and A. E. Friday (eds) Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction, pp. 21-74. Academic Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Renzaglia, K. S. (1978). A comparative morphology and developmental anatomy of the Anthocero-phyta. J. Hattori bot. Lab. 44, 31–90.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster, R. M. (1979). The phylogeny of the Hepaticae. In: G. C. S. Clarke and J. G. Duckett (eds) Bryophyte Systematics, pp. 41-82. Academic Press. London.
   Google Scholar
• Sluiman, H. J. (1985). A cladistic evaluation of the lower and higher green plants (Viridiplantae). Syst. Evol. 149, 217–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. J. E. (1978). The Moss Flora of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge University Press, London and Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Sober, E. (1983). Parsimony in systematics: philosophical issues. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 14, 335-335. Sober, E. (1985). A likelihood justification of parsimony. Cladistics 1, 209–233.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, P. F. (1980). Evolutionary polarity of character states. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11, 333–358.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, P. F. (1984). Homology and phylogeny: morphology and systematics. Syst. Bot. 9, 395–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, K. D. & Mattox, K. R. (1975). Comparative morphology, evolution and classification of the green algae with some consideration of other organisms with chlorophyll A and B. Bot. Rev. 41, 104–135.
   Google Scholar
• Vitt, D. H. (1971). The infrageneric evolution, phylogeny, and taxonomy of the genus Orthotrichum (Musci) in North America. Nova Hedwigia 21, 683–711.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W. H. (1961). Problems in the classification of ferns. In: Recent Advances in Botany, pp. 841-844. Univ. Toronto Press, Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W. H. (1980). Origin and philosophy of the groundplan-divergence method of cladistics. Syst. Bot. 5, 173–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, W. H. (1983). Reticulistics: the recognition of hybrids and their role in cladistics and classification. In: N. I. Platnick and V. A. Funk (eds) Advances in Cladistics, Volume 2, pp. 63–79. Columbia University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Wanntorp, H.-E. (1983). Reticulated cladograms and the identification of hybrid taxa. In: N. I. Platnick and V. A. Funk (eds) Advances in Cladistics, Volume 2, pp. 81–88. Columbia University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Watrous, L. E. & Wheeler, Q. D. (1981). The out-group comparison method of character analysis. Syst. Zoo!. 30, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, E. O. (1980). Phylogenetic systematics and vicariance biogeography. Syst. Bot. 5, 194-194. Wiley, E. O. (1981). Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. John Wiley, New York.
   Google Scholar
• BRENT D. M1SHLER, Department of Botany, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A. 27706.
   Google Scholar